Nurlatifah, Mufti
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Fact-Checking dan Jurnalisme Kolaboratif pada Platform Media Online Nurlatifah, Mufti
Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI Vol 18, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : FISIP Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1256.99 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jik.v18i1.1871

Abstract

Perlawanan terhadap hoaks di Indonesia tidak hanya dilakukan melalui gerakan sosial, namun juga melalui praktik verifikasi informasi pada beragam media. Sejumlah media online melakukan perlawanan terhadap hoaks dengan melakukan fact-checking journalism. Praktik jurnalisme pemeriksa fakta yang dilakukan oleh media-media ini mengadaptasi konsep hipermedia milik Ireton dan Posetti dengan melakukan pemilahan informasi melalui tahapan verifikasi informasi. Mekanisme ini memadukan kemampuan mesin digital dalam menggali informasi dan kemampuan jurnalis dalam menyajikan hasil verifikasi informasi. Melalui analisis isi kualitatif, kajian ini mengelaborasi fact-checking journalism pada Tirto.id dan Kompas.com sebagai bentuk jurnalisme kolaboratif antara manusia dengan mesin untuk melawan hoaks.
Sertifikasi dan Paradoks Legitimasi Profesionalitas Jurnalis di Indonesia Nurlatifah, Mufti
Jurnal Riset Komunikasi (JURKOM) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Asosiasi Pendidikan Tinggi Ilmu Komuniasi (ASPIKOM) Wilayah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Journalist certification legitimizes Indonesia’s journalists’ professionalism in producing, managing, and disseminating information, including serving the public interest. According, to Indonesia’s Journalist Competency Test (UKW), journalists can be determined based on their competence level, such as young journalists, middle journalists, and senior journalists. Those three levels also dictate journalist into their position and function at media institutions. This condition presents a confluence of opportunities and challenges in Indonesian journalism professional practice. Journalists certification, on the one hand, validates the professionalism of journalists in the performance of their jobs and sets them apart from other information producers. But, on the other hand, normative measurement through certification mechanisms also promotes strict standardization which violates media freedom vigor for journalism. Paradoxically, the energy to raise journalist standards is unequal to the other areas of professional journalism, like attempts to raise the standard of quality content journalism itself and being professional journalists ethically, remain unaffected. This study elaborates on Indonesia’s condition in descriptive and qualitative analysis of journalist certification data from the Indonesia Press Council. Although the quantification of Indonesian journalists is still a delightful success on paper, it raises questions about the caliber of journalists and journalism practices in Indonesia.