Leasa, Elias Zadrach
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Penjatuhan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Perspektif Tujuan Hukum Kelian, Jubeda; Leasa, Elias Zadrach
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 2, Oktober 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3840

Abstract

Introduction: Money laundering is a serious crime that has a significant impact on the stability of the national economy and financial system. The complexity of money laundering schemes requires the application of a system of evidence and the imposition of criminal sanctions that are consistent with the objectives of the law, namely justice, legal certainty, and public interest.Purposes of the Research This study aims to analyze and discuss the burden of proof in money laundering cases, as well as to analyze and discuss the imposition of sanctions on perpetrators of money laundering from the perspective of the objectives of the law.Methods of the Research: This study is a normative legal research study that employs a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case-based approach. The legal materials used include primary legal sources and secondary legal sources. The legal materials were collected through a literature review. The processing of the legal materials involved the following stages: identification of legal issues, searching for primary and secondary legal materials, and grouping of relevant legal materials. All legal materials obtained were subsequently analyzed qualitatively.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results of this study indicate that the imposition of criminal sanctions on money laundering offenders aligns with the legal objectives of legal certainty through clear criminalization, separation from the predicate offense, and anti-tipping-off measures. The Justice Perspective, where criminal sanctions aim to restore a sense of justice in society, ensuring that proceeds of crime are not enjoyed by the perpetrators, through asset forfeiture, punishing both active and passive perpetrators, and creating a deterrent effect. The Utility Perspective, which involves protecting the financial system, recovering state losses, and preventing further criminal acts.
Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Sarimanella, Michelle Nicole; Adam, Sherly; Leasa, Elias Zadrach
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 7 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 7, September 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v2i7.1133

Abstract

Introduction: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)) is a digital video camera device that is used to transmit signals to a monitor screen in a certain room or place. It has the aim of being able to monitor the situation or condition of a certain place, so that it can prevent the occurrence of a crime or can be used as evidence of a crime that has occurred.Purposes of the Research:  Analyze and discuss the mechanism of using CCTV as evidence of evidence in the crime of murder and Knowing the obstacles in using CCTV as evidence of instructions in the crime of murderMethods of the Research: This study uses a normative juridical research method because it uses a literature study that adheres to the juridical aspects with the types of statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches.Results of the Research: The results of the study show that CCTV in its mechanism can be used as evidence for instructions in a criminal act, especially a crime of murder, if the CCTV has a link between witness statements, letters, and the defendant's statement as stated in Article 188 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code although there are several obstacles in the evidentiary process such as unclear CCTV footage and different expert views regarding the use of CCTV recordings as evidence for instructions in the process of proving the crime of murder.