Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata
Prayitno, Indra
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KEDUDUKAN PEGAWAI NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI DALAM AKTA AUTENTIK PADA PROSES PENYIDIKAN DAN PERADILAN DITINJAU UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS Andony, Fakta; Afriana, Anita; Prayitno, Indra
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Juli - Desember 2020
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.133

Abstract

The existence of a Deed Witness is part of the formal aspect of the deed. Without a witness deed, t the notary deed as a Notary Deed, but only has the power of proof as an underhand deed. In addition, the actions of Notary employees as witnesses to deeds in each Notary’s deed are included in the notary fi eld, so that if it is linked to Article 16 paragraph (1) letter f of the Notary Position Law regarding keeping everything concerning deeds made by Notaries, the employees should a notary as a witness to the deed must be able to keep the contents of the deed confi dential. This article intends to fi nd out about the process of summoning notary employees who are witnesses to the deed for investigation and trial in connection with the confi dentiality of the contents of the deed and protecting the confi dentiality of the contents of the deed in the investigation and judicial process involving notary offi ce employees as witnesses to the deed. The results show that summoning notary employees who are deed witnesses for investigation and trial based on UUJN is that there are no rules for special procedures for calling witnesses to deeds in the investigation and trial process. A witness to deed does not have the right of refusal as a notary, therefore what applies is the provision as reference to KUHAP and HIR/Rbg. Protection of the confi dentiality of the contents of the deed in the investigation and judicial process involving notary offi ce employees as witnesses to the deed that there is no obligation for notary employees who are witnesses to the deed to keep the contents of the deed secret during the investigation and trial process. Notary employees who are witnesses to the deed do not completely violate the law because there are no rules in UUJN that regulate the oath to keep the contents of the deed confi dential
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP PERUBAHAN ANGGARAN DASAR BERDASARKAN AKTA SALINAN RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM LUAR BIASA (RUPS-LB) DIKAITKAN DENGAN ASAS PRESUMPTIO IUSTAE CAUSA Salsabila, Noor Naifah; Ikhwansyah, Isis; Prayitno, Indra
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 10, No 3 (2024): Volume 10, Nomor 3 July-September 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v10i3.10471

Abstract

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh suatu kondisi dimana seorang notaris melakukan pelanggaran atau penyimpangan dalam pelaksanaan pembuatan akta perubahan anggaran dasar yang tidak memenuhi syarat pelaksanaan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS)/Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa (RUPS-LB) dalam Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas, yang mana akta tersebut menjadi dasar untuk diterbitkannya Surat Keputusan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengkaji kepastian hukum terhadap surat Keputusan Menteri hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia terkait perubahan anggaran dasar Perseroan terbatas yang didasarkan pada akta RUPS dikaitkan dengan Asas Presumptio Iustae Causa. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif. Hasil kajian penelitian ini diketahui bahwa: pertama, suatu akta dikatakan sah sampai dikeluarkannya suatu putusan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. Kedua, seorang notaris tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kebenaran formil terkait data atau substansi akta yang dikehendaki para pihak, selama notaris bersikap netral dan tidak memihak. Kata Kunci : Notaris, Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham, Asas Presumptio Iustae Causa ABSTRACT This research was motivated by a condition where a notary committed a violation or deviation in the implementation of the deed of amendment to the articles of association which did not meet the requirements for holding the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS)/Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS-LB) in the Limited Liability Company Law. , where the deed is the basis for the issuance of the Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights. The aim of this research is to examine the legal certainty regarding the Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights regarding changes to the articles of association of limited liability companies which are based on the GMS deed linked to the Presumptio Iustae Causa Principle. This research method uses a juridical-normative method. The results of this research study show that: first, a deed is said to be valid until a decision is issued which has permanent legal force. Second, a notary is not responsible for the formal correctness of the data or substance of the deed desired by the parties, as long as the notary is neutral and impartial. Keywords: Notary, General Meeting Of Shareholders, Presumption Iustae Causa Principle
Co-Authors Andony, Fakta Anita Afriana Isis Ikhwansyah Salsabila, Noor Naifah