Sihombing, Uli Parulian
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE RECOGNITION OF THE RELIGION IN THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE COMMUNITY IN INDONESIA ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS NUMBER 97/PUU-XIV/2016 AND 140/PUU-VII/2009 Sihombing, Uli Parulian; Safa'at, Muchammad Ali; Setya Negara, Tunggal Ashari; Widiarto, Aan Eko
Tadulako Law Review Vol 5, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Tadulako University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article is intended to conduct a legal research on how the constitutional courts have interpreted the meaning of the religion in the constitution of Indonesia. The author has applied normative legal reseach method by compiling and analyzing the constititonal court decisions related to the issue of the religios in the indigenous community in Indonesia. Also, the author try to raise a statutory approach and legal reasonings in the constitutional court decision to analyse the legal issues. According to the result of this legal research, the author comes to the following conclussions; the constitutional court decisions has applied and used the historic interpretation method of a religion meaning in the constitution, but the constitutional courts have come to the different result of the religion meaning in the constitution. While the constitutional court decision number 140/PUU-VII/2009 excluded the meaning of the religion in the constitution, however, the constitutional court decision number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 embarced the meaning of the religion in the constitution.
Penafsiran atas Makna Agama di dalam Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Menurut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016 dan Nomor 140/PUU-VII/2009 Sihombing, Uli Parulian
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (404.759 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1641

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas penafsiran terhadap makna agama di dalam konstitusi, yang mana terdapat perbedaan dalam penafsiran makna agama tersebut yaitu menurut Putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016 agama di masyarakat adat (penghayat kepercayaan) termasuk ke dalam makna agama di dalam konstitusi, sementara menurut Putusan MK Nomor 140/PUU-VII/2009 agama di masyarakat adat tidak termasuk ke dalam pengertian agama di dalam konstitusi. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan penafsiran historis. Berdasarkan asas hukum lex prosterior derogat legi priori menegaskan Putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016 yang diputuskan oleh MK belakangan  mengesampingkan berlakunya Putusan MK Nomor 140/PUU-VII/2009.This article is intended to discuss interpretation on the religion meaning in the Constitution where there is a different result of interpretation to the meaning of the religion in the Constitution according to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 and the Constitutional Court Decision Number 140/PUU-VII/2009. The Constitutional Court Decision Number 140/PUU-VII/2009 says the religion in the indigenous community (the Penghayat Kepercayaan) is not part of the religion meaning in the Constitution, but according to the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-IV/2016 the religion in the indigenous community is part of the religion meaning in the Constitution. Finally, a law principle of Lex Posterior Derogat Legi Priori is applied to such legal issue where the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 overrules the Constitutional Court Decision Number 140/PUU-VII/2009.