Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGGUNAAN PENGAYA (ADD-ON) AUTOCRAT PADA GOOGLE SHEETS DALAM APLIKASI SERING CUTI SYAEFUDIN, ROCHMAT ALI; Suseno, Wahyu Hanggoro
Jurnal Saintekom : Sains, Teknologi, Komputer dan Manajemen Vol 10 No 1 (2020): Maret 2020
Publisher : STMIK Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (224.609 KB) | DOI: 10.33020/saintekom.v10i1.129

Abstract

The use of information technology in the government administration is carried out to realize good governance. The use of information systems enables the automation of work and service functions including for human resource administration. Administration of employee leave at the Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Surakarta still running manually. Employees who will take leave apply it manually and often cause problems because the application not in accordance with the provisions, among others are the misidentification of the authorized official to provide leave which makes the administration of employee leave ineffective. Sering Cuti using free Google facilities which easy to learn and can be easily used by employees and Autocrat add-on. This add-on processes mail merge the employee leave data, converting into filled application form and sends directly to the employee's e-mail address. Autocrat uses in the Sering Cuti has made it easier to administer and reduce errors in employee leave applications. Sering Cuti can be accessed by employees easily and apply for employee leave anywhere online.
Constitutional Review and Minority Rights: Aligning Domestic Courts with International Norms Syaefudin, Rochmat Ali
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): October 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v2i4.1120

Abstract

The protection of minority rights is central to democratic governance and international human rights law. This article examines how constitutional review mechanisms interact with international normative frameworks to shape outcomes for ethnic, religious, and linguistic minorities in democratic states. Drawing on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the UN Declaration on Minorities, and the Council of Europe Framework Convention, the study outlines the legal obligations imposed on states. Through a comparative doctrinal and institutional analysis of Germany, India, South Africa, the United States, and the European Court of Human Rights, it evaluates the effectiveness of different constitutional review models. Data from the Comparative Constitutions Project and landmark case law illustrate the significance of institutional design particularly centralized review and individual complaint mechanisms in enabling courts to enforce minority protections. The discussion highlights the importance of institutional strength, alignment with international norms, resistance to political interference, and transjudicial dialogue in sustaining robust protections. The article concludes that judicial effectiveness in minority rights adjudication hinges on coherent legal frameworks, empowered institutions, and principled jurisprudence that resonates with international human rights standards.