Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENGGUNAAN PENGAYA (ADD-ON) AUTOCRAT PADA GOOGLE SHEETS DALAM APLIKASI SERING CUTI SYAEFUDIN, ROCHMAT ALI; Suseno, Wahyu Hanggoro
Jurnal Saintekom : Sains, Teknologi, Komputer dan Manajemen Vol 10 No 1 (2020): Maret 2020
Publisher : STMIK Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (224.609 KB) | DOI: 10.33020/saintekom.v10i1.129

Abstract

The use of information technology in the government administration is carried out to realize good governance. The use of information systems enables the automation of work and service functions including for human resource administration. Administration of employee leave at the Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Surakarta still running manually. Employees who will take leave apply it manually and often cause problems because the application not in accordance with the provisions, among others are the misidentification of the authorized official to provide leave which makes the administration of employee leave ineffective. Sering Cuti using free Google facilities which easy to learn and can be easily used by employees and Autocrat add-on. This add-on processes mail merge the employee leave data, converting into filled application form and sends directly to the employee's e-mail address. Autocrat uses in the Sering Cuti has made it easier to administer and reduce errors in employee leave applications. Sering Cuti can be accessed by employees easily and apply for employee leave anywhere online.
Cross-Border Consumer Disputes in the Digital Marketplace: Rethinking Jurisdiction and Law in Global E-Commerce Governance Taufiqurokhman; Sara, Rineke; Suseno, Wahyu Hanggoro; Zakaria, Ricky Muhamad
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v3i4.1122

Abstract

Cross-border e-commerce has created unprecedented opportunities for global trade but also introduced complex legal challenges regarding jurisdiction and applicable law in consumer disputes. This article explores how legal systems particularly those of the European Union (EU), the United States (US), ASEAN, and Indonesia govern jurisdiction and applicable law in business-to-consumer (B2C) e-commerce transactions. Using a doctrinal and comparative legal method, the study analyzes key instruments such as the Brussels I Recast, Rome I and II Regulations, Hague Conventions of 2005 and 2019, and relevant national laws. Case law from the CJEU and US courts is used to illustrate doctrinal interpretations, with attention to the targeting test, forum-selection enforceability, and protection of consumer rights. Procedural tools such as the Hague Service and Evidence Conventions are also examined. Findings reveal that while the EU offers a harmonized, consumer-focused regime, enforcement across borders remains inconsistent. The Hague 2019 Convention presents a pathway toward enforceability but requires broader ratification. The US system emphasizes contractual freedom, often limiting consumer protections. Regional efforts, particularly in ASEAN and Indonesia, demonstrate varied progress in legal harmonization. Jurisdictional ambiguity, enforcement gaps, and fragmented legal standards continue to affect legal certainty in cross-border e-commerce. The article concludes that harmonized jurisdictional and applicable law standards, coupled with technological and institutional innovation, are necessary to ensure consumer protection and support legal predictability in global digital markets.