Chandra, M Jeffri Arlinandes
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Standardization Harmonization, Consolidation, and Refinement of Draft Laws in DPR and DPD Chandra, M Jeffri Arlinandes; Wahanisa, Rofi; Kosasih, Ade; Barid, Vera Bararah
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Legal Education in Current Development: Problems and Challenges
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijicle.v5i2.68191

Abstract

The Purpose of this research is to find a formula for harmonizing, consolidating, and refining the concept of draft laws. Harmonization activities are based on policy formulation (regulation system) and material harmonization (substance), with the aim of adjusting the existing national legal system to the new legal system, creating a harmonious law as a positive law (harmony of law). The plural nature of the places where harmonization, consolidation, and refinement of the concept of draft laws occur are the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) - Committee on Legislation (Baleg), the Government - Ministry of Law and Human Rights (Depkumham), and the Regional Representative Council (DPD) - Committee on Legislation and PPUU. This makes the practice of harmonization have different interpretations from each institution, which highlights the need for agreement among these institutions in determining standardization in harmonization, consolidation, and refinement of the concept of draft laws. Furthermore, an analysis is needed to determine the appropriate time for harmonization, consolidation, and refinement of the concept of draft laws, whether it should be done before submitting the bill as is currently done, or after discussions are completed, or both before and after. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effectiveness of the implementation of the activities of harmonizing, consolidating, and refining the concept of draft laws to minimize the filing of judicial reviews at the Constitutional Court.
Rekonsruksi Tahapan Pembentukan Perundang-undangan: Urgensi Re-Harmonisasi dan Evaluasi sebagai Siklus Pembentukan Undang-undangan yang Berkualitas Chandra, M Jeffri Arlinandes; anggono, bayu dwi; Febrian, Febrian
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 19, No 4 (2022): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Desember 2022
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v19i4.980

Abstract

Indonesia is a state based on laws and regulations which are formed as basic rules in the state and society. The law as the main basis must be formed in accordance with the principles of establishing good laws and regulations so that it is hoped that later it can be applied and has binding legal force for all levels of society. The current situation is far from expectations for the formation of a good law, for example the formation of a job creation law which is considered not to actively involve the community, many articles are contrary to legal principles, are harmonized and synchronized between statutory regulations, the formation of laws that seem rushed so there are many errors in writing (typo) and much more. Therefore, it is necessary to reconstruct stages in order to at least achieve the desired expectations in the formation of a good law. This paper uses normative research with a statutory approach, a comparative approach, and finally concludes with a conceptual approach where concepts that are considered suitable can be applied in Indonesia. 2 things that become important highlights in this paper are First, the practice of harmonization, synchronization and consolidation of conceptions that have been well implemented but only exist at the planning and drafting stages of the Draft Law, while after the discussion/Mutual agreement (plenary) there are great opportunities regarding changes the changes that occurred which made it very possible for the disharmony and synchronization of the bill to be ratified, then secondly, the issue of public participation which seemed to be a complementary ingredient in the formation of the law, therefore this paper provides the best solution for reviewing (preview) a bill before it is passed so that there is a review. harmonization and also means of education, consultation and publication of pre-ratification and promulgation of laws to be ratified
Tinjauan Yuridis Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang Sistematis, Harmonis dan Terpadu di Indonesia Chandra, M Jeffri Arlinandes; Wahanisa, Rofi; Kosasih, Ade
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 19, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2022
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v19i1.790

Abstract

AbstrakPeraturan perundang-undangan yang baik adalah yang harmonis dengan peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya. Ketidakharmonisan antara peraturan perundang-undangan dengan peraturan lain pada tingkat yang sama atau pada tingkat yang berbeda akan menimbulkan masalah yang kompleks. Salah satu contoh kontroversi dalam Revisi Undang-Undang Pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi (KPK) yang banyak terjadi penolakan oleh berbagai kalangan. dalam pembentukan ataupun Peninjauan Kembali sebuah undang-undang yaitu memperhatikan aspirasi dan kebutuhan hukum masyarakat. Tulisan ini menganalisa mengenai pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undang di Indonesia dalam mewujudkan Peraturan perundang-undangan yang Sistematis, Harmonis, Terpadu. Metode yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah gabungan dari penelitian normatif yang didukung dengan data - data empiris penelitian lapangan (field research). Pendekatan menekankan pada pencarian norma-norma yang terkandung dalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan dan teori-teori hukum yang ada, serta menggunakan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach).Hasil pembahasan, bahwa Pengakuan terhadap hukum yang dibuat merupakan suatu hal yang amat penting sehingga setiap tahapan pembuatan peraturan perundang-undangan harus sebaik mungkin di setiap tahap. Salah satu aspek yang berpengaruh yaitu transparansi dan akuntabel yang tercermin dalam melibatkan partisipasi publik/konsultasi publik dalam setiap tahapannya. Sehingga sangat “urgent” jika pemantauan dan peninjauan sangat penting terhadap suatu UU yang telah dibentuk agar publik dapat melakukan judicial review dan juga legislative review.   Kata kunci: pembentukan peraturan perundangan; judicial review; legislatif review