Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review SCIENTIA JOURNAL : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Simamora, Lisa
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DILIHAT DARI PERMA NOMOR 02 TAHUN 2012 DAN KUHP Simamora, Lisa; Svinarky, Irene
SCIENTIA JOURNAL Vol 2 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Putera Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pencurian merupakan suatu tindak kejahatan yang seringkali terjadi sehingga menimbulkan keresahan bagi masyarakat. Kejahatan dimasyarakat dapat terjadi dimana saja, kapan saja dan dalam bentuk yang beragam. Umumnya pelaku kejahatan karena didorong oleh pemenuhan kebutuhan yang relatif sulit dipenuhi yang salah satu penyebabnya ialah sedikitnya lapangan pekerjaan yang tersedia. Dampak yang dirasakan akibat tindak pidana kejahatan yang terjadi menuntut para penegak hukum dapat memberikan sanksi hukum dan kebijakan yang tepat agar sesuai aturan hukum yang berlaku. Tujuan penelitian dalam jurnal ini adalah, Mengetahui pertimbangan hakim dalam memutuskan kasus pencurian dilihat dari PERMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 dan Proses hukum oleh penegakkan hukum terhadap kasus pencurian perkebunan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah Yuridis Norrmatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan undang-undang, buku dan jurnal. Pembahasan dalam jurnal ini adalah Perkara Pidana Ringan (Tipiring) yang merupakan perkara yang sering terjadi pada masyarakat Indonesia. Terdapat banyak kasus pencurian menurut harga barang yang tergolong kecil yang diadili oleh Pengadilan banyak menyita perhatian masarakat. Hasil penelitian adalah kasus pencurian diproses berdasarkan tindak pidana umum yang seharusnya tindak pidana ringan sesuai dengan PERMA Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 sehingga bertentangan dengan Pasal 2 ayat (2) dan ayat (3). Pada dasarnya tidak ada penahan, proses pemeriksaan cepat dan diputuskan dengan hakim tunggal.
JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG DIJADIKAN JAMINAN KEMBALI DENGAN TIDAK MELAKUKAN PENGHAPUSAN FIDUSIA MENURUT PRESPEKTIF HUKUM DI INDONESIA Situmeang, Rinal Efries; Svinarky, Irene; Simamora, Lisa
UNES Law Review Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v2i3.122

Abstract

Fiduciary is shift that did by fiduciary owner to fiduciary receiver, while for up object ability that present on object owner. Number law 42 Years 1999 about Fiduciary Surety or more recognized with UUJF is attributed to make and gives protection of the parties so fiduciary transactions to the fore also expected to qualify law on fiduciary. Fiduciary will erase if object that made by indemnity being paid off by its loan, while is fiduciary was placed to an object really being prohibited for fiduciary giver for vouch in as indemnity is back but a long cry intention of Section 17 UUJF with Section 23 sentences (2) UU JF . In Section 23 sentences (2 ) bear out one of rule it that object that becomes fiduciary indemnity can be shifted if get agreement in writing of fiduciary receiver but variably its thing with what does he meant on Section 25 sentences (1) UUJH. Section 25 sentences (1) UUJH where terminological its formulation that fiduciary indemnity delete because of that fiduciary indemnity is alone was demolish; then indemnity that is used for fiduciary was end its book debt; then fiduciary giver to fiduciary receiver; rights release on fiduciary indemnity by fiduciary receiver; and if goods that becomes fiduciary indemnity disappear therefore fiduciary will erase. Observational type that is used in this research is jurisdictional observational type normative. Fiduciary indemnity terminological UUJF bases Section 17 be borne out that: Information hits indemnity object as object that stills in fiduciary indemnity and still enrolled therefore fiduciary giver is prohibited to do fiduciary and Section 17 not if fiduciary receiver accept therefore get to make that indemnity as back indemnity without ask for fiduciary indemnity deletions as royal. To the effect to list that fiduciary back as surety of giving afters fiduciary fiduciary pays off that goods is subject to be not remove prefentif's rights divides fiduciary receiver.
Co-Authors Irene Svinarky Situmeang, Rinal Efries