Halim, Felicia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Comparison Of Antibacterial Effects On Cinnamomum Burmannii Water Extract With Penicillin Against Staphylococcus Aureus In Vitro Halim, Felicia; Dewi, Bernadette Dian Novita; Sutandhio, Silvia
JOURNAL OF WIDYA MEDIKA JUNIOR Vol 2, No 1 (2020): January
Publisher : FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1112.866 KB) | DOI: 10.33508/jwmj.v2i1.2335

Abstract

Introduction: Along with the development of science, many varieties of microorganisms are resistant to antibiotics. To avoid cases of resistance grew severe, researchers developed alternative medicines as a substitute for antibiotics. One of the ingredients of herbs researched that has antibacterial activity is Cinnamon (Cinnamomum burmannii). Aim: This study aimed to compare antibacterial effects water extract of Cinnamomum burmannii with penicillin against Staphylococcus aureus Methods: This an experimental studies witd non-equivalent control group design. Research using the bacteria S. aureus are divided into two groups, the control group and experimental group. The concentration of Cinnamomum burmannii and penicillin are used that is 80- 150mg/L. Antibacterial test used dilution method and a microplate reader for reading absorbance. This research conducted in the laboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya for 2 weeks. Result: Based on visual observations, Cinnamomum burmannii’s MIC is located at concentration 320- 600 mg/L while penicillin’s MIC is located at concentration 160- 300 mg/L. Based on the results of microdilution test, Cinnamomum burmannii’s MIC is located at concentration 160- 300 mg/L while penicillin’s MIC is located at concentration 640- 1200 mg/L. Conclusion: The conclusion of this research is giving Cinnamomum burmannii water extract in Staphylococcus aureus has efficacy or inhibitory that is not significantly different with penicillin.
Balloon sinuplasty versus surgical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis Halim, Felicia; Sutikno, Budi
Oto Rhino Laryngologica Indonesiana Vol. 55 No. 2 (2025): VOLUME 55, NO. 2 JULY - DECEMBER 2025
Publisher : PERHATI-KL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32637/orli.v55i2.727

Abstract

Background: An inflammation of the nose and paranasal sinuses is known as rhinosinusitis, and should it persist for 12 weeks or longer, it becomes chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Compared to medical therapy, balloon dilatation has been shown to produce statistically significant improvements in symptoms, quality of life, nasal endoscopy scores, and Computed Tomography Paranasal Sinuses (CT-PNS) scores. The outcomes are comparable to those of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS). Furthermore, it was discovered to be a method that was both safe and bearable. Purpose: To ascertain the role of balloon dilatation in the management of CRS, by comparing the result of Balloon Sinuplasty versus Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Literature review: A search of Google Scholar over the last 10 years found 375 results, and 14 could used as reference sources. Conclusion: Balloon sinuplasty is a useful method to overcome CRS. Balloon sinuplasty is minimally invasive, avoiding more aggresive and drastic procedures, for cases that are severe and unresponsive to medical treatment.