Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BEHAVIORAL COUNSELING WITH TOKEN ECONOMY AND BEHAVIOR CONTRACT TECHNIQUES TO REDUCE ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION Sidiq, Muhamad; Mulawarman, Mulawarman; Awalya, Awalya
Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Vol 9 No 1 (2020): Januari 2020
Publisher : Study Program of Guidance and Counseling, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Academic procrastination makes students? learning outcomes low. As a result, they may not make it to the next level or even be expelled. Accordingly, this study was intended to examine the effectiveness of behavioral counseling with token economy and behavior contract techniques to reduce the academic procrastination of the students of SMP IT Insan Cendekia Semarang. The study was experimental and used repeated measure design. The subjects were 16 students chosen using purposive sampling. Further, the data of this study were collected through students? academic procrastination scale. After the analysis, there found that the experimental group with behavior contract technique gained higher reduction than the token economy group. Thus, counselors are suggested to apply token economy, and behavior contract in guidance and counseling services.
Application of Criminal Procedures to Perpetrators of Corruption Crimes Based on Perma No. 1 of 2020 concerning Sentencing Guidelines Article 2 Article 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law Najemi, Andi; Monita, Yulia; Erwin, Erwin; Sidiq, Muhamad
Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities Vol 6 No 2 (2023): Berumpun: International Journal Of Social, Politics, and Humanities
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences University of Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/berumpun.v6i2.113

Abstract

The Jambi Corruption Crime Court (Tipikor) in handing down crimes is more dominant in applying Article 3 compared to Article 2 against perpetrators who cause harm to state finances and handing down decisions in the light category, namely an average of 1 year and 11 months. Regarding this issue, the aim of the research is to carry out an analysis of the judge's decision in relation to the implementation of Perma No. 1 of 2020 concerning Sentencing Guidelines for Article 2 and Article 3 of the Corruption Law. By conducting a study of the Jambi Corruption Court's decision, the judge's decision will be evaluated in the light, medium and heavy categories, so that a clear picture of the judge's rationale in implementing PERMA No.1 of 2020 is obtained. The type of research is normative juridical, namely examining materials law, both primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The approach is to use a statutory approach and a case approach by analyzing cases related to the legal issues discussed. From the results of the research on the Jambi District Court's decision 1) The decision handed down by the Judge regarding the implementation of PERMA Number 1 of 2020 has not been used as a guideline in handing down the decision. This can be assessed from the verdict handed down by the judge. The length of the prison sentence imposed is not in accordance with the categories as formulated, namely the categories of state losses are the most severe, heavy, medium, light and lightest, where in each category there is a classification, namely the range of prison sentences imposed is adjusted to that category. 2) The aim of punishment in corruption cases is to recover state losses, but in the imposition of a substitute sentence imposed by the judge the aim of the sentence has not been realized, because in PERMA there is no regulation regarding guidelines for imposing additional punishment as replacement money.
Analisis Dampak Putusan Etik terhadap Keabsahan Putusan Lembaga Peradilan: Perbandingan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Putusan Badan Peradilan dalam Lingkup Mahkamah Agung Sidiq, Muhamad
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Constitutionalism places the constitution as the supreme law that binds all state administrators, with the Constitutional Court (MK) as the guardian of the constitution through final and binding judicial review decisions. However, serious challenges have emerged regarding ethical violations by constitutional judges, such as in Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which raises questions about the legitimacy and validity of the decision. This study employs a normative legal method with a doctrinal approach to analyze the applicability and impact of ethical rulings on MK decisions and compares them with ethical oversight and decision correction practices within the Supreme Court (MA). The findings indicate that ethical violations by MK judges only result in personal sanctions without invalidating the substance of the decision, while in the MA, although there is a mechanism for reviewing decisions related to ethical violations, its implementation is highly limited. This study recommends strengthening ethical oversight mechanisms that are more integrated with substantive review of decisions and developing an internal accountability system to maintain the integrity and legitimacy of the judicial institution without compromising legal certainty.