Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation
Sari, Ruhyat Wulan
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Mixed Training Program: Helping Seesaw to Develop Blended Learning at the Community Learning Center Sari, Ruhyat Wulan; Khaerudin, Khaerudin; Kusumawardani, Dwi
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 6, No 1 (2022): February
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v6i1.38800

Abstract

This study aims to produce a mix training program with the help of seesaw to develop blended learning designs, obtain data on feasibility tests and test the effectiveness of the mix training program. The type of research used is research and development with a systems approach that refers to the ADDIE and PEDATI models. Methods of data collection by questionnaires, interviews, observation, study documentation and tests. The data is then analyzed by quantitative data analysis techniques and qualitative data analysis techniques. The results of the study generally indicate that the quality of the prototype training program mix produced based on expert reviews from aspects of learning design, learning materials and media is 80.00%, 93.33%, and 86.66%. Meanwhile, based on the results of one to one and small group trials, the quality of the prototype produced was 85.38%. Based on the results of the expert review and user trials, it can be concluded that the prototype of the designed mixed training program is very feasible to use. Meanwhile, after implementing the seesaw-assisted mix training program to develop blended learning designs at the Community Learning Activity Center, the N-Gain score was 0.62 in the medium category, and the N-Gain score percentage value was 61.70% in the quite effective category. Thus, this mixed training program can improve the performance of the equivalence education tutors of the Community Learning Activity Center to develop blended learning designs.
Mixed Training Program: Helping Seesaw to Develop Blended Learning at the Community Learning Center Sari, Ruhyat Wulan; Khaerudin, Khaerudin; Kusumawardani, Dwi
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 6 No 1 (2022): February
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (354.166 KB) | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v6i1.38800

Abstract

All tutors work from home and only one day a week from the office, so an innovative learning approach is required. This study aims to produce a blended training program using seesaw to develop a blended learning design. The type of research used is research and development with a system approach that refers to the ADDIE and PEDATI models. Methods of collecting data with questionnaires, interviews, observations, documentation studies and tests. The feasibility test consists of expert review, one to one trial and small group trial. Based on the results of the feasibility test in expert review phase, this training program needs improvements in learning design aspects such as the learning models and methods used, discussion materials, task materials, and prerequisite competencies. Improvements to material aspects such as complete non examples and materials are arranged from the easiest to the most difficult. Improvements in the aspects of learning media is using color in slide background. The results of the one to one phase of feasibility test is improvement regarding time to achieve competency prerequisites, it is necessary to add reference sources in the form of links or qr codes, and it’s better to provide non video tutorials when on using the seesaw application. The results of the small group feasibility test still need improvement, using pdf format in presentation slide. The results of the effective test showed that there was an increase in cognitive domain learning outcomes between the pretest and posttest so that the trainees were able to develop blended learning designs. The N-Gain score of the increase is 0.62 (61.70%) with a fairly effective category.
Co-Authors Khaerudin Khaerudin Kusumawardani, Dwi