Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ASAS : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah JURNAL MAHKAMAH
Fauzi, Muhammad Yasir
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Wasiat Wajibah Terhadap Non Muslim dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Hukum Keluarga Fauzi, Muhammad Yasir
Jurnal Mahkamah : Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 June (2020)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jm.v5i1.902

Abstract

Seorang non Muslim tidaklah mendapatkan warisan dari Muslim atau sebaliknya, begitu juga terdapat dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam yang juga melarang adanya waris beda agama, hal itu juga seirama dengan fatwa MUI yang juga mengharamkan adanya waris beda agama, namun di sisi lain muncullah putusan Mahkamah Agung yang sangat berbeda dan bahkan bertentangan dengan dasar hukum normatif dan hukum positif di Indonesia, yaitu Putusan No. 368K/AG/1995 dan Putusan No. 51K/SG/1999, serta Putusan No. 16 K/AG/2010. Illat putusan hukum tersebut tidak diqiyaskan kepada ahli waris beda agama yang tidak mendapatkan warisan, namun diqiyaskan kepada bentuk sedekah atau hibah dapat diberikan kepada siapa saja yang dikehendaki. Yurisprudensinya Mahkamah Agung dalam mengambil keputusan dengan memberikan hak ahli waris non kusus yaitu menetapkan hukum Islam kontemporer, memakai kaidah hukum apabila orang tua beragama berbeda dengan anak maka dianggap meninggalkan wasiat yang disebut wasiat wajibah. Dan mengambil keputusan dengan memberikan hak ahli waris non Muslim berdasarkan wasiat wajibah.
Dispute Resolution of Akad Mudharabah Muqayyadah (Analysis of Decision No. 1695/Pdt.G/2012/PA. Js, Number 5/Pdt.G/2014/PTA. Jk and Number 272 K/Ag/2015) Fauzi, Muhammad Yasir; Pane, Erina; Hasan, Muhamad
ASAS Vol. 15 No. 02 (2023): Asas, Vol. 15, No. 02 Desember 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/asas.v15i02.18521

Abstract

Sharia economic dispute resolution in Indonesia can be resolved through litigation and non-litigation. Through litigation becomes the absolute authority of religious courts, while non-litigation can be through deliberation, mediation or sharia arbitration bodies. The problem in this study is about the disparity in the decision of religious court judges in deciding disputes over mudharabah muqayyadah contracts submitted in religious courts, namely Decision Number 1695 / Pdt.G / 2012 / PA. Js, Number 5/Pdt.G/2014/PTA. Jk and Number 272 K / Ag / 2015, which in its contract mentions the sharia arbitration body as a dispute resolution institution. The purpose of this study is to analyze the judge's consideration of the disparity of the three rulings. This type of research is literature research and the nature of analytical descriptive research. The data obtained was sourced from the document of the South Jakarta Religious Court Decision Number 1695 / Pdt.G / 2012 / PA. Js, Jakarta High Religious Court Decision Number 5/Pdt.G/2014/PTA. Jk and Supreme Court Decision Number 272 K / Ag / 2015. Data collection techniques by means of library and documentation methods. Data analysis using qualitative analysis research methods. The results of this study showed that the South Jakarta Court Decision granted the Plaintiff's lawsuit by not considering the authority of the religious court in resolving the dispute despite the difference in contract clauses, the Jakarta High Religious Court stated that the religious court was not authorized to adjudicate the dispute because there was an arbitration clause in the contract, while the Supreme Court ruled that the religious court was authorized to resolve the dispute with consideration under Article 1343 and Article 1344 of the Civil Code, that is, the will of the parties takes precedence.Keywords: contract mudharabah muqayyadah, sharia economics, dispute resolution
Co-Authors Erina Pane Muhamad Hasan