Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Jurnal Borneo Administrator: Media Pengembangan Paradigma dan Inovasi Sistem Administrasi Negara Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I)
Marianti, Sukaesi
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Individual ability on high-stakes test: Choosing cumulative score or rasch for scoring model Khair, Muhammad Dhiyaul; Marianti, Sukaesi
Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Vol. 28 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta in cooperation with Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia (HEPI) Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/pep.v28i1.71661

Abstract

In a test, a method is required to estimate an individual's ability based on their responses. Typically, this is done by summing the correct responses or calculating a cumulative score. An alternative method is the Rasch model. This study aims to determine whether an individual's position, based on cumulative score estimates, remains unchanged or changes when compared with ability estimates using Rasch on dichotomous responses. The study uses open-source data from the 2018 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and involves 317 Indonesian students.  Ability analysis will be conducted on Math and Reading aspects using cumulative scores and Rasch with dichotomous responses. The study will employ data analysis techniques such as Rasch, paired samples t-test, and descriptive statistical analysis. The cumulative score and Rasch results will be tested using a paired samples t-test, and a comparison of the cumulative score and Rasch estimation results will be carried out using descriptive statistical analysis. The study results indicate that there are differences in individual positions based on ability estimates using cumulative score and Rasch. These differences are caused by variations in scores. Therefore, even if two individuals have the same cumulative score, they may have different Rasch estimates.
Comparing item-total correlation and item-theta correlation in test item selection: A simulation and empirical study Marianti, Sukaesi; Rufaida, Ana; Hasanah, Nur; Nuryanti, Sofia
Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Vol. 27 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta in cooperation with Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia (HEPI) Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/pep.v27i2.61477

Abstract

One of the important processes in the evaluation of the psychometric properties of a test is item selection. The item selection process usually uses a very popular technique called item-total correlation. This study attempts to describe the item-total correlation technique and explore it using a similar technique called item-theta correlation. Both techniques are applied using simulation studies by creating several conditions related to test length and sample size. After the simulation study, the next step is the study using empirical data as an illustration of the results of the simulation study. The results of this study show that there are differences in the results of item selection based on these two approaches. Item-theta correlation detects more items that have weak discrimination power than item-total correlation. The difference is more noticeable in conditions where the cutoff point used for item selection is low(.20).
Evaluation of Different Person-Fit Measures in Cognitive Tests with Different Test Lengths Marianti, Sukaesi; Manao, Herdin Natalius; Faiha, Arij
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol 13, No 2 (2024): JP3I
Publisher : Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v13i2.34601

Abstract

Test takers’ characteristic is an exciting topic to discuss in psychometric research. In this study, person-fit is a part of the person characteristics applied in the context of cognitive tests. Given the importance of accurately estimating item and person parameters, person-fit is a statistical technique that can detect aberrant responses. Aberrance adversely affects the estimation process at the level of items and persons. The purpose of this study was to introduce and apply two popular person-fit statistics called and . These two statistics were applied in two studies, in study 1 using N = 317 and item = 16, and in study 2 using N = 331 and item = 49. The results showed that in studies 1 and 2,  detected more aberrant responses compared to . Significant differences in estimated results from both techniques were also shown in Study 2. The outcomes of this study are valuable for researchers and practitioners in the field of psychometrics who rely on , as a foundation for identifying aberrant responses.
Evaluation of Different Person-Fit Measures in Cognitive Tests with Different Test Lengths Marianti, Sukaesi; Manao, Herdin Natalius; Faiha, Arij
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): JP3I
Publisher : FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v13i2.34601

Abstract

Test takers’ characteristic is an exciting topic to discuss in psychometric research. In this study, person-fit is a part of the person characteristics applied in the context of cognitive tests. Given the importance of accurately estimating item and person parameters, person-fit is a statistical technique that can detect aberrant responses. Aberrance adversely affects the estimation process at the level of items and persons. The purpose of this study was to introduce and apply two popular person-fit statistics called and . These two statistics were applied in two studies, in study 1 using N = 317 and item = 16, and in study 2 using N = 331 and item = 49. The results showed that in studies 1 and 2,  detected more aberrant responses compared to . Significant differences in estimated results from both techniques were also shown in Study 2. The outcomes of this study are valuable for researchers and practitioners in the field of psychometrics who rely on , as a foundation for identifying aberrant responses.
OJREK BARENG: Memperdebatkan Argumen Apati dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Publik (Studi Kasus Bank Sampah Malang): OJREK BARENG: Arguing the Argument of Apathy in Solving Public Issue (Case Study of Malang Garbage Bank) Sari, Qurnia Indah Permata; Sobari, Wawan; Marianti, Sukaesi
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol. 16 No. 1 (2020): April 2020
Publisher : Pusjar SKPP Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (532.425 KB) | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v16i1.623

Abstract

The dominant argument about the work of Everyday Makers states that apathy encourages community involvement in solving public problems. This qualitative case study aims to explore the workings of the Everyday Makers practice in the case of Malang Garbage Bank management. Unlike the previous argument, this study found an enthusiastic attitude that encouraged the community to work together in handling the waste problem in Malang city. The enthusiastic attitude that drives the community to work with the government and the private sector is the philosophy of Ojrek Bareng which is based on Arek Culture. This philosophy was reflected in the expression of the community in dealing with waste problems, namely sengkuyung seduluran (brotherhood spirit), ewuh pakewuh (uneasy feelings) and tanpo pamrih (sincere). This study debates the workings of Everyday Makers, that what drives the work of Everyday Makers in solving public problems is public's apathy towards the government. However, this study found that Ojrek Bareng as acommunity enthusiasm in solving waste problems through the Malang Garbage Bank. The practical implications of this study were the governance of public issue. Keywords: Everyday Makers, Governance, Malang Garbage Bank Abstrak Argumen dominan tentang bekerjanya Everyday Makers menyebutkan bahwa sikap apati mendorong keterlibatan masyarakat dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan publik. Studi kasus kualitatif ini bertujuan mengeksplorasi bekerjanya praktik Everyday Makers dalam kasus pengelolaan Bank Sampah Malang. Berbeda dengan argumen sebelumnya, studi ini menemukan sikap antusias yang mendorong masyarakat untuk bekerjasama dalam penanganan masalah sampah di Kota Malang. Sikap antusias yang mendorong masyarakat untuk bekerjasama dengan pemerintah dan swasta adalah filosofi Ojrek Bareng yang dilandasi oleh Budaya Arek. Filosofi ini tercermin dari ungkapan masyarakat dalam menangani permasalahan sampah yaitu sengkuyung seduluran (semangat persaudaraan), ewuh pakewuh (perasaan tidak enak) dan tanpo pamrih (tanpa pamrih). Studi ini mendebat bekerjanya Everyday Makers, bahwa yang mendorong bekerjanya Everyday Makers dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan publik adalah sikap apati masyarakat terhadap pemerintah. Namun, studi ini menemukan bahwa Ojrek Bareng sebagai bentuk antusiasme masyarakat dalam menyelesaikan masalah sampah lewat Bank Sampah Malang. Implikasi praktis dari studi ini adalah tata kelola masalah publik. Kata kunci: Everyday Makers, Governance, Bank Sampah Malang
Co-Authors Faiha, Arij Khair, Muhammad Dhiyaul Manao, Herdin Natalius Nur Hasanah Nuryanti, Sofia Rufaida, Ana Sari, Qurnia Indah Permata Wawan Sobari