Maimun, Achmad
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Resistensi Terhadap Hermeneutika dalam Kajian Al-Qur'an di Indonesia(Pemetaan Varian dan Kepentingan) Maimun, Achmad
SUHUF Vol 8 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22548/shf.v8i2.8

Abstract

Resistensi terhadap hermeneutika belum mendapatkan banyak perhatian. Padahal ini penting sebagai bahan evaluasi untuk mematangkannya upaya pencarian metode yang lebih baik dalam memahami al-Qur’an. Kenyataannya, para penolak hermeneutika tidak seragam dalam beberapa aspeknya. Variasi tersebut terlihat dari argumen, aktor, latar dan kepentingannya. Dari kajian ini ditemukan bahwa argumentasi penolakannya terbagi menjadi tiga: argumen ideologis, teologis, epistemologis. Dalam berbagai argumen yang diberikan tampak para pemikirnya memberikan penekanan yang berbeda, walaupun tidak jarang penolakan itu melakukan generalisasi berlebihan. Jika dilihat dari kapasitas penggagasnya: santri, akademisi dan aktivis Islam. Jika dilihat dari latarnya mencakup pesantren dan perguruan tinggi Islam dan umum, dalam dan luar negeri. Berdasar kepentingan yang ada di baliknya, penolak hermeneutika mengusung beragam kepentingan: (1) puritan-fundamentalis, yaitu kepentingan perlawanan atas Barat dan penegasan identitas Islam sekaligus perlindungan kemurnian Islam dan unsur luar yang dapat mencemari; (2) tradisionalis, yakni  kepentingan melindungi otiritas tradisional atas syariah sebagai penjamin otentisitas melalui isna>d; (3) saintifik, yaitu kepentigan untuk netral dan objektif terhadap hermeneutika sehingga bisa memperkaya wawasan untuk pengembangan pemikiran Islam secara proporsional tanpa melabrak batasan baku dan merusak iman.Kata Kunci: Resistensi Hermeneutika, Puritan-Fundamentalis, Tradisionalis, Saintifik.
Hidayah in the Process of Conversion to Islam in the Perspective of Muallaf Maimun, Achmad
IJIP : Indonesian Journal of Islamic Psychology Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Da'wa Faculty of Islamic State University Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/ijip.v5i1.193

Abstract

In islamic teachings, Hidayah (Divine Guidance) becomes a fundamental aspect as it determines a person's salvation, especially for it in the hereafter. The ulemas, through a deductive approach, formulate hidayah comprehensively based on textual evidence. On the other hand, muallaf feels the presence of hidayah in their spiritual journey through the process of conversion. Based on this background, this study was aimed to formulate the concept of hidayah from the perspective of muallaf and to compare it with the perspective of the ulemas. To address these issues, a qualitative approach was used in this study. The primary method of data collection was in-depth interviews conducted with ten muallaf from diverse social, economic, and educational backgrounds. The findings of this research were as follows: hidayah comes illuminatively and requires sacrifice, Allah does not misguide humans but only provides guidance to them, and hidayah is a terra incognita. Furthermore, the results of comparing the perspectives of ulema and muallaf on hidayah were as follows: ulemas use a deductive-speculative approach, while muallaf use an inductive-empirical approach. The ulemas base their views on textual evidence, whereas muallaf rely on their psychological-spiritual experiences. Conceptually, the explanations provided by the ulemas regarding hidayah are more comprehensive and systematic, while the explanations by muallaf are simpler. In the aspect of Allah's will, muallaf believe that Allah does not misguide His believers, while ulemas hold a different view.