Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

OPTIMALISASI ASAS OPORTUNITAS PADA KEWENANGAN JAKSA GUNA MEMINIMALISIR DAMPAK PRIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PEMIDANAAN Nugraha, Yodi
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v6i1.3882

Abstract

In the Indonesian criminal justice system, every public prosecutor possesses the authority to cease criminal prosecution in the name of public interest. In contrast, in the Netherland, only the Attorney General (Procureur Generaal) at the Supreme Court has this authority.  This article discusses this authority to cease of terminate criminal prosecution in the name of public interest.  To do this a comparative approach is used in which the ruling of this authority to terminate criminal prosecution as found in the Draft of the Indonesian Criminal Code will be compared against the same regulation and policy used in the Netherlands.  A doctrinal and comparative law approach will be used. One recommendation resulting from this research is the need to re-evaluate the existing procedure and requirement of terminating criminal prosecution in the public interest in the Indonesian context and the introduction of Rechter-Commissaris into the criminal justice system.
OPTIMALISASI ASAS OPORTUNITAS PADA KEWENANGAN JAKSA GUNA MEMINIMALISIR DAMPAK PRIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PEMIDANAAN Nugraha, Yodi
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v6i1.3882

Abstract

In the Indonesian criminal justice system, every public prosecutor possesses the authority to cease criminal prosecution in the name of public interest. In contrast, in the Netherland, only the Attorney General (Procureur Generaal) at the Supreme Court has this authority.  This article discusses this authority to cease of terminate criminal prosecution in the name of public interest.  To do this a comparative approach is used in which the ruling of this authority to terminate criminal prosecution as found in the Draft of the Indonesian Criminal Code will be compared against the same regulation and policy used in the Netherlands.  A doctrinal and comparative law approach will be used. One recommendation resulting from this research is the need to re-evaluate the existing procedure and requirement of terminating criminal prosecution in the public interest in the Indonesian context and the introduction of Rechter-Commissaris into the criminal justice system.
Kepastian Hukum Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah dengan Dasar Penerbitan Surat Palsu (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Batusangkar Nomor 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk) Nugraha, Yodi; Rembrandt, Rembrandt; Sofyan, Syofirman
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.968

Abstract

The case of a land dispute with the object of the dispute being a certificate of land rights issued using a fake document is the Decision of the Class II Batusangkar District Court Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk which has obtained permanent legal force. The dispute in this case is located in Jorong Baruah, Nagari Padang Magek, Rangkat District, Tanah Datar Regency. The research method used is normative juridical with a case approach. The findings in this research, namely that certificates of land rights issued using fake documents, certainly do not provide legal certainty. This certificate can be categorized as a genuine but fake certificate. This kind of certificate must of course be canceled and declared invalid and withdrawn from circulation after being proven through a process in the District Court. To prevent the occurrence of genuine but fake certificates, this is by increasing the accuracy of the authorities who process the creation and issuance of land title certificates. The consideration of the Panel of Judges in the Decision of the Batusangkar District Court Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk is that the Defendant was legally and convincingly proven at trial to fulfill the criminal elements charged by the Public Prosecutor, namely Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. So the Panel of Judges sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months.