M, Yusmaridi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

VALIDITAS MODUL FISIKA DASAR BERBASIS KONSEP TERINTEGRASI NILAI-NILAI KEISLAMAN Juita, Dewi; M, Yusmaridi; Alwis, Alwis
Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi dan Sains Vol 7, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi dan Sains
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (90.624 KB) | DOI: 10.22202/jrfes.2020.v7i1.4082

Abstract

Modul Fisika Dasar berbasis konsep terintegrasi nilai-nilai keislaman ini dikembangkan pada konsep Dinamika Partikel. Pengujian validitas modul ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui apakah modul yang dikembangkan ini benar-benar dapat memberikan pemahaman konsep yang baik kepada mahasiswa serta melalui modul ini dapat mengembangkan karakter islami mahasiswa. Model pengembangan yang digunakan menggunakan model 4D dengan tahapan pendefenisian, perancangan, dan pengembangan. Penelitian ini focus kepada tahapan pengembangan dengan mengacu pada pengujian validitas modul sebagai pijakan pengembangan modul. Penilaian validitas modul dibagi dalam tiga komponen berupa komponen penyajian, kelayakan isi, dan kebahasaan. Komponen penyajian memiliki nilai validasi 79,69. Komponen kelayakan isi memiliki validasi 72,22. Komponen kebahasaan memiliki nilai validasi 78,85. Semua komponen berada dalam kategori valid.
Kualitas Proses Bimbingan Skripsi Mahasiswa Jurusan Tadris Biologi IAIN Kerinci di Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Juita, Dewi; M, Yusmaridi
Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA dan Pendidikan IPA Vol 6, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/nsc.v6i2.1820

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of obtaining a description of the quality of the minithesis guidance process that took place during the covid-pandemic period in Biology Education Department IAIN Kerinci and student satisfaction in carrying out the guidance process during the pandemic. The research method used is a descriptive method with a questionnaire instrument quality process guidance minithesis and written interviews online. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results obtained by the quality of the minithesis guidance process of students during the pandemic are in the good category with an average of 66.4. Media that are widely used during the minithesis guidance process are whatsApp and email. As many as 60% of the sample of students were satisfied with the guidance process they went through during the pandemic. The minithesis guidance process experiences many obstacles, one of which is in terms of guidance time and ineffective communication between the supervisor and students. The solutions provided by students include continuing to carry out offline counseling by paying attention to health protocols.
Analisis Kesadaran Metakognitif Mahasiswa Jurusan Tadris Biologi terhadap Pembelajaran Biologi di IAIN Kerinci Angraini, Lola; Juita, Dewi; M, Yusmaridi
Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA dan Pendidikan IPA Vol 7, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Metacognitive awareness is indispensable for successful learning, considering metacognitive awareness allows students to be able to manage cognitive skills and be able to see their weaknesses, so that improvements can be made in subsequent actions. The development in the 21st century demands that everyone be aware of the importance of metacognition. This study aims to analyze the metacognitive awareness of students towards learning biology in the Biology study program and to determine the level of metacognitive awareness of biology students at IAIN Kerinci in class A and B semester 3. Data collection using questionnaires or questionnaires and interviews. The descriptive data analysis technique was categorized into two, namely the metacognitive awareness interval and the metacognitive awareness percentage. The results of this study indicate that: (1) Each indicator of metacognitive awareness is measured using the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI), where each point of the indicator is different. The categorization of metacognitive awareness is divided into 5, namely very good, good, moderate, low, and very low. (2) The percentages for metacognitive awareness of Biology students in the third semester are as follows: in class A there are 3 (very low), 4 (low), 4 (moderate), and 1 (good). Whereas in class B there are 1 (very low), 11 (low), and 4 (moderate). (3) The results of the metacognitive awareness interview of Biology students in semester 3 showed that each individual has different metacognitive awareness, and of course understands a different material.