Yusup, Muhammad Yusril
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Development of Case-Based Learning Device with Cognitive Conflict Strategies to Improve the Critical Thinking Ability of Prospective Teacher Students Yusup, Muhammad Yusril; Harjono, Ahmad; Makhrus, Muh
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education Vol. 3 No. 2: December 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/ijece.v3i2.1792

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and evaluate a Case-Based Learning (CBL) device incorporating cognitive conflict strategies to enhance the critical thinking abilities of prospective teacher students, a response to the global competitiveness challenge faced by Indonesian education. Through a methodological lens of research and development, the study meticulously validated a suite of educational devices, including lesson plans, student worksheets, teaching materials, and instruments designed to test critical thinking abilities. Additionally, the research scrutinized the practicality of these devices in actual classroom settings, ensuring their applicability in real-world educational environments. The findings from this comprehensive analysis revealed that the CBL device not only met the criteria for validity and reliability but also demonstrated significant practicality, as evidenced by its seamless integration and consistent application in classroom scenarios. A pivotal aspect of the study was the quantifiable enhancement in the critical thinking capabilities of the students involved, which was rigorously assessed through pretest and posttest measures. These assessments, underpinned by substantial effect sizes obtained via paired t-test analyses, highlighted a marked improvement in the critical thinking skills of the prospective teachers. The empirical evidence garnered through this research underscores the transformative potential of the CBL device, advocating for its widespread adoption in teacher education programs. The study posits that such an innovative educational device is quintessential for equipping future educators with the necessary skills to navigate and contribute effectively to the 21st-century educational landscape, thereby responding adeptly to the evolving demands of global educational competitiveness.
Development of Case-Based Learning Device with Cognitive Conflict Strategies to Improve the Critical Thinking Ability of Prospective Teacher Students Yusup, Muhammad Yusril; Harjono, Ahmad; Makhrus, Muh
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): December
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/ijece.v3i2.1792

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and evaluate a Case-Based Learning (CBL) device incorporating cognitive conflict strategies to enhance the critical thinking abilities of prospective teacher students, a response to the global competitiveness challenge faced by Indonesian education. Through a methodological lens of research and development, the study meticulously validated a suite of educational devices, including lesson plans, student worksheets, teaching materials, and instruments designed to test critical thinking abilities. Additionally, the research scrutinized the practicality of these devices in actual classroom settings, ensuring their applicability in real-world educational environments. The findings from this comprehensive analysis revealed that the CBL device not only met the criteria for validity and reliability but also demonstrated significant practicality, as evidenced by its seamless integration and consistent application in classroom scenarios. A pivotal aspect of the study was the quantifiable enhancement in the critical thinking capabilities of the students involved, which was rigorously assessed through pretest and posttest measures. These assessments, underpinned by substantial effect sizes obtained via paired t-test analyses, highlighted a marked improvement in the critical thinking skills of the prospective teachers. The empirical evidence garnered through this research underscores the transformative potential of the CBL device, advocating for its widespread adoption in teacher education programs. The study posits that such an innovative educational device is quintessential for equipping future educators with the necessary skills to navigate and contribute effectively to the 21st-century educational landscape, thereby responding adeptly to the evolving demands of global educational competitiveness.
Development of Case-Based Learning Device with Cognitive Conflict Strategies to Improve the Critical Thinking Ability of Prospective Teacher Students Yusup, Muhammad Yusril; Harjono, Ahmad; Makhrus, Muh
International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): December
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/ijece.v3i2.1792

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and evaluate a Case-Based Learning (CBL) device incorporating cognitive conflict strategies to enhance the critical thinking abilities of prospective teacher students, a response to the global competitiveness challenge faced by Indonesian education. Through a methodological lens of research and development, the study meticulously validated a suite of educational devices, including lesson plans, student worksheets, teaching materials, and instruments designed to test critical thinking abilities. Additionally, the research scrutinized the practicality of these devices in actual classroom settings, ensuring their applicability in real-world educational environments. The findings from this comprehensive analysis revealed that the CBL device not only met the criteria for validity and reliability but also demonstrated significant practicality, as evidenced by its seamless integration and consistent application in classroom scenarios. A pivotal aspect of the study was the quantifiable enhancement in the critical thinking capabilities of the students involved, which was rigorously assessed through pretest and posttest measures. These assessments, underpinned by substantial effect sizes obtained via paired t-test analyses, highlighted a marked improvement in the critical thinking skills of the prospective teachers. The empirical evidence garnered through this research underscores the transformative potential of the CBL device, advocating for its widespread adoption in teacher education programs. The study posits that such an innovative educational device is quintessential for equipping future educators with the necessary skills to navigate and contribute effectively to the 21st-century educational landscape, thereby responding adeptly to the evolving demands of global educational competitiveness.
Penguatan Literasi Akademik Mahasiswa FSTT melalui Sosialisasi Teknik Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Prayogi, Saiful; Azmi, Irham; As’ari, Muhammad; Samsuri, Taufik; Muhali, Muhali; Yusup, Muhammad Yusril; Kurnia, Nova; Mirawati, Baiq; Fitriani, Herdiyana; Verawati, I Putu; Hunaepi, Hunaepi; Aminullah, Aminullah; Ikhsan, Muhamad
Sasambo: Jurnal Abdimas (Journal of Community Service) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (LITPAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/4k1t1279

Abstract

Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan memperkuat literasi akademik mahasiswa Fakultas Sains, Teknik, dan Terapan (FSTT) melalui sosialisasi teknik penulisan karya ilmiah. Latar belakang kegiatan didasarkan pada kebutuhan mahasiswa dalam memahami konsep dasar karya ilmiah, struktur tulisan, teknik penulisan, sitasi dan referensi, serta etika akademik. Metode pelaksanaan dirancang melalui tiga tahap, yaitu persiapan, pelaksanaan, dan evaluasi. Tahap persiapan mencakup identifikasi kebutuhan, penyusunan materi, koordinasi teknis, dan penyusunan instrumen angket. Tahap pelaksanaan dilakukan secara tatap muka dengan melibatkan 21 mahasiswa melalui pendekatan transfer of knowledge, ceramah interaktif, dan tanya jawab. Evaluasi dilakukan menggunakan angket skala Likert dan dianalisis secara deskriptif kuantitatif berdasarkan skor rata-rata dan persentase. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman peserta terhadap materi berada pada kategori baik dengan mean 3,84 dan persentase 76,80%. Indikator tertinggi terdapat pada pemahaman struktur karya ilmiah, sedangkan indikator terendah terdapat pada teknik penulisan ilmiah. Respon peserta juga berada pada kategori baik dengan mean 3,91 dan persentase 78,19%. Kompetensi narasumber memperoleh penilaian tertinggi, sedangkan metode dan pelaksanaan menjadi aspek yang masih perlu ditingkatkan. Kegiatan ini menunjukkan bahwa sosialisasi terstruktur dan interaktif dapat mendukung penguatan literasi akademik mahasiswa. Oleh karena itu, kegiatan lanjutan perlu menambahkan praktik menulis, umpan balik, dan evaluasi berbasis kinerja secara lebih sistematis berkelanjutan. Strengthening Academic Literacy of FSTT Students through the Socialization of Scientific Writing Techniques This community service program aimed to strengthen the academic literacy of students of the Faculty of Science, Engineering, and Applied Sciences (FSTT) through the dissemination of scientific writing techniques. The program was based on students’ needs to improve their understanding of the basic concepts of scientific papers, writing structure, academic writing techniques, citation and references, and academic ethics. The activity was implemented in three stages: preparation, implementation, and evaluation. The preparation stage included needs identification, material development, technical coordination, and questionnaire preparation. The implementation stage was conducted face-to-face with 21 students using a transfer of knowledge approach, interactive lectures, and question-and-answer sessions. Evaluation was carried out using a Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed descriptively through mean scores and percentages. The results showed that participants’ understanding of the material was in the good category, with a mean score of 3.84 and a percentage of 76.80%. The highest indicator was understanding the structure of scientific papers, while the lowest was scientific writing techniques. Participants’ responses were also in the good category, with a mean score of 3.91 and a percentage of 78.19%. The speaker’s competence received the highest rating, whereas the method and implementation aspects still require improvement. These findings indicate that structured and interactive dissemination can support the strengthening of students’ academic literacy. Future programs should include writing practice, feedback, and performance-based evaluation.