Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NUKHBATUL 'ULUM : Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam AL-BASHIRAH: Journal of Islamic Studies
Abdullah Nazhim Hamid
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Hukum Penisbahan Sifat Pencipta pada Manusia dan Hubungannya dengan Pemahaman Qadariyah Abdullah Nazhim Hamid; Rifai, Awal
NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam Vol 6 No 1 (2020): NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/nukhbah.v6i1.118

Abstract

This research was aiming to know the rule of atribution of creator to mandkind and its relation to the Qadariyah’s believes. This research used the library review methods by collecting the views of the scholars from the linguist of Arabic Langiage, Quran Interpreters, and generalist scholars which are have concern abaout the Islamic doctrines. The Result of The Research showed that of word al-khalqu in Arabic has two meanings, the first meaning is to put something out of nothingness to existance and the second is to invent or make or produce or transform of one nature into another. Therefore, the rule of this atribituon is depends on two conditions, the purpose of using the word “creator” and its object. If the word “creator” based on the second meaning, and the object is the things are still in human capacity and reasoning then the using is allowed. However, if those two conditions are not fulfilled, then the using is prohibited. Moreover, if the attribution is related to the human act and accompanied by the belief that there is no divine intervention and human is the main cause of his creation, then it is closely related to the Qadariyah understanding.
Konsep Kepemimpinan Negara Islam (Studi Komparasi Pemikiran al-Mawardi dan Ibnu Taimiyah) Kasman Bakry; Abdul Haris Abbas; Ashar; Abdullah Nazhim Hamid
NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam Vol 7 No 1 (2021): NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/nukhbah.v7i1.201

Abstract

The objectives of this study is to explore and compare the concept of leadership in an Islamic state according to Ibn Taimiyah and al-Mawardi. This study is a qualitative descriptive comparative study, with normative, conceptual, and historical approach. The result os study reveals that Ibn Taymiyyah pays more attention to the ultimate goal of a state leadership, namely the benefit of the world and the hereafter, while al-Mawardi is more concerned with the government system in the form of imāmah or khilāfah.
التحليل التقابلي بين اللغتين العربية والإندونيسية في المفعول به: A Contrastive Analysis of Arabic and Indonesian in the Study of Mafʿūl Bih (Direct Object) Rustam Koly; Abdullah Nazhim Hamid; Ronny Mahmuddin
البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): البصيرة: مجلة الدراسات الإسلامية
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M), Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/bashirah.v6i1.1817

Abstract

This study aims to examine the concept of mafʿūl bih (direct object) in Arabic and Indonesian, focusing on similarities and differences between the two languages and describing their respective usage methods. It also seeks to contribute to addressing the difficulties and errors faced by Indonesian-speaking learners of Arabic, especially in understanding and applying the concept of mafʿūl bih. The study is limited to comparing formal Arabic (fuṣḥā) and standard Indonesian in terms of the mafʿūl bih, using a descriptive-analytical-comparative method. The analysis involves three main steps: first, a linguistic description of mafʿūl bih in both languages; second, identification of similarities and differences; and third, prediction of potential learning difficulties arising from those differences. Key findings include: both languages share common features, such as mafʿūl bih being an additional element in the sentence and its ability to occur more than once and typically at the end. However, differences include Arabic allowing up to three direct objects for some verbs, while Indonesian generally limits this to two. Furthermore, mafʿūl bih in Arabic is identified by grammatical case markings (ʿirāb), whereas in Indonesian, it is identified by sentence position. Arabic also allows three structural variations of mafʿūl bih, while Indonesian generally maintains a fixed structure. These differences represent major obstacles for Indonesian-speaking learners of Arabic.
Co-Authors Abdul Haris Abbas Ashar Kasman Bakry Kasman Bakry Mahmuddin, Ronny Rifai, Awal Rustam Koly