Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kerugma
Bastanta, Dedi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Metode Penafsiran Narasi Injil Markus Gozali, Margareth Christian; Bastanta, Dedi; Tambunan, Parsaoran
KERUGMA: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Oktober 2022
Publisher : STT Injili Indonesia Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2500/kerugma.v4i2.85

Abstract

This article focuses on the interpretation of the type of narrative literature (story) which is directed at the interpretation of the narrative in Mark’s Gospel. The theory used set off from The Hermeneutical Spiral book by Grant R. Osborne which combined with another narrative interpretation theory. The Hermeneutic principles in narrative interpretation are as follows: first, structural analysis, that are macro and micro structures. The macro structure examines the narrative text as a whole to find the author's intention as a whole. The micro structure examines the narrative text in detail so that it can divide the story into action units. Second, analysis of narrative style writing. The principle of this interpretation investigates whether there is chiasmus, inclusion (framework techniques), repetition (repetition) and other literary traits. At this step, various information from primary source commentaries are collected to determine whether there is a particular narrative writing style used by the story writer. Third, editorial analysis of a narrative. This principle of interpretation examines the ways in which narrative writers use sources in the writing of each story. Fourth, the exegetical analysis of a narrative. This principle of interpretation deals with the original grammar of the biblical authorship and semantics (word study). Fifth, a theological analysis of a narrative. In principle a narrative is a theology presented in the form of stories. Sixth, contextualization a story. This principle of interpretation means applying lessons from the story to certain concrete situations today.                                                                                                                                                                                                      
Konsep Pembenaran Menurut Roma 5:1-11 Suatu Studi Eksegesis Hia, Martini; Bastanta, Dedi; Tambunan, Parsaoran
KERUGMA: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): April 2023
Publisher : STT Injili Indonesia Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2500/kerugma.v5i1.87

Abstract

One of the worst consequences of the man's fall into the sin is death. The first humans, Adam and Eve, after violating God's command by eating the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden of Eden, made them violate God's commandment (sinful), this violation has brought the heaviest punishment, namely death for that human. The Lord God is faithful and infinite justice to what He has said, giving rewards, life to everyone who sincerely does His will and carries out the punishment, death for everyone who violates His word. But the Lord God in all His omniscience (providensia) along with the passage of time and His design, has determined the only way and rule for everyone to be justified before God, is If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved (Romans 10:9-10), He is a real form of God who is Loving and has come into the world (Incarnation), He has sacrificed / died on the cross and rose from the grave on the third day to save mankind, then the sinner has the status of "justified" before God. The purpose of the study was to find the original meaning of the word "justification" according to Romans 5:1-11 by using the descriptive exegesis method and answering various questions regarding salvation only by faith in Christ Jesus.Keywords: Jesus Christ; Salvation; Justification.  
Yesus dan Hermeneutik Gezerah Shavah (Tinjauan Teks Kontroversi Sabat) Tarigan, Wahyu Triwira; Bastanta, Dedi; Simanungkalit, Hulman
KERUGMA: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): OKTOBER 2023
Publisher : STT Injili Indonesia Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2500/kerugma.v3i2.108

Abstract

Abstract: This article reviews the story of the Jesus controversy that occurred on the Sabbath in the synoptic gospel records (Mark 2:23-28; Matthew 12:1-8; Luke 6:1-5) in which the Pharisees encountered the actions that had been committed. by the disciples was a "breaking" of the sabbath, Jesus' response first referred to David's incident recorded in the controversial account 1 samuel 21, where David ate the holy bread that only priests could eat, his action against the law but justified because David's life was at stake (piqquach nefesh). However, Jesus' problem with the Sabbath by referring to David's controversy seems unparalleled, some even think that Jesus failed to respond to the Pharisees' questions by quoting David's story, because in principle an analogy must be parallel to what he wants to explain (gezerah shavah). So, this article will not discuss every detail or narrative difference from the three synoptic gospels, this research only goes so far as to review gezerah shawah and piqquach nefesh on quotes to David not as a failure.    Keywords: Hermeneutic; Gezerah Shavah; Piqquach Nefesh; Halakhah; Haggadah. Abstrak:Artikel ini mengulas cerita tentang kontroversi Yesus yang terjadi pada hari sabat dalam catatan injil sinoptik (Markus 2:23-28; Matius 12:1-8; Lukas 6:1-5) yang pada kesempatannya Orang-orang Farisi menemui tindakan yang telah diperbuat oleh murid-murid adalah “pelanggaran” atas haris sabat, respons Yesus pertama-tama merujuk pada peristiwa Daud yang tercatat dalam akun 1 samuel 21 yang kontroversial, di mana Daud memakan roti kudus yang hanya bisa dimakan para imam, tindakannya yang melawan hukum namun dibenarkan karena nyawa Daud sedang dipertaruhkan (piqquach nefesh). Namun, masalah Yesus atas hari sabat dengan merujuk pada kontroversi Daud terlihat seolah tidak paralel, bahkan beberapa menganggap Yesus gagal menanggapi pertanyaan orang-orang Farisi dengan mengutip cerita Daud, karena pada prinsipnya sebuah analogi harus sejajar dengan apa yang hendak dijelaskan (gezerah shavah). Maka, artikel ini, tidak akan membahas setiap detail maupun perbedaan  narasi dari ketiga injil sinoptik, penelitian ini hanya sejauh meninjau gezerah shavah dan piqquach nefesh atas kutipan kepada Daud bukan sebagai kegagalan.    Kata Kunci: Hermeneutik; Gezerah Shavah; Piqquach Nefesh; Halakhah; Haggadah.
Co-Authors Gozali, Margareth Christian Hia, Martini Simanungkalit, Hulman Tambunan, Parsaoran Tarigan, Wahyu Triwira