Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi
Fareha, Nur
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Challenges of Using the Omnibus Law Method in Indonesia’s Legal System Widayati, Widayati; Winanto, Winanto; Laksana, Andri Winjaya; Huda, Moh. Nurul; Fareha, Nur
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13382

Abstract

The introduction of the Omnibus Law with Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation marked a significant change in Indonesia’s approach to legislation, as this method was previously unfamiliar in the country. Consequently, the law faced legal challenges and was brought before the Constitutional Court (MK) for review. The Court ruled that the legislative process was flawed, highlighting a lack of public involvement and transparency, and found that the omnibus law method did not have a solid legal foundation within Indonesia’s existing legal framework. In response to these concerns, the House of Representatives and the President passed Law Number 13 of 2022, which included guidelines for using the omnibus law method in future legislation. This method is widely used in common law countries, while Indonesia operates under a civil law system rooted in democratic principles. This study focused on examining implications of the omnibus law method through a normative juridical approach, utilizing secondary data and qualitative analysis. The findings show that while this method can streamline the drafting and discussion of laws—saving time and effort—it also has significant downsides. This include a tendency to prioritize practicality over thorough research and limited public engagement, which undermines its democratic nature. Therefore, if Indonesia chooses to continue using the omnibus law method, it is crucial to address these limitations. Specifically, there must be genuine opportunities for public participation that go beyond just empty formalities. Careful and accurate implementation is needed to ensure that the resulting legislation is effective, high quality, and ultimately regarded as beneficial by the community.
Juridical Review on the Support of Inheritance Rights in the Perspective of Compilation of Islamic Law Andri, Muhammad; Fareha, Nur
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.6059

Abstract

Innovations in land registration, such as electronic land rights and certificates, aim to enhance the quality of land services. In Indonesia, digital transformation has driven the government to reform land services, notably through Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation. Article 147 stipulates that land rights, property rights to flats, management rights, and related documents may be in electronic form. This regulation is implemented through Ministerial Regulation No. 1 of 2021 on Electronic Certificates and Ministerial Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on Issuing Electronic Documents in Land Registration. This study examines the legal certainty of electronic land certificates as proof of ownership and the legal protection of electronic land ownership data. A normative juridical approach is employed, utilizing qualitative descriptive research based on primary and secondary legal materials collected through literature study. The data analysis method processes legal materials to address formulated legal issues qualitatively and descriptively. The findings indicate: (1) Electronic land certificates qualify as electronic evidence with the same legal standing as traditional paper documents. (2) Legal protection for electronic land ownership data includes: (a) Preventive legal protection, ensuring personal data security through obligations imposed on the Electronic System Operator—specifically, the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ASP/HNLA)—to safeguard public data confidentiality. (b) Repressive legal protection, allowing affected individuals to file lawsuits against the government in case of data breaches.
Co-Authors Andri Winjaya Laksana, Andri Winjaya Moh. Nurul Huda, Moh. Nurul Muhammad Andri Widayati Widayati winanto, winanto