Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Statuta Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Open Access DRIVERset
Suindrayani, Ni Putu Tya
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
MENGKRITISI PERLINDUNGAN KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA MALPRAKTIK MEDIS: PARADIGMA CRITICAL VICTIMOLOGY Suindrayani, Ni Putu Tya
Jurnal Hukum Statuta Vol 4 No 3 (2025): Volume 4, Nomor 3, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jhs.v4i3.12247

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to determine the ius constitutum for the protection of medical malpractice crimes victim in Indonesia, as well as to find out the critical victimology view in examining the protection of medical malpractice crimes victim in Indonesia. This research is an empirical legal research by analyzing the results of interviews and reviewing them with a critical victimology approach. The conclusion of this study is the ius constitutum for the protection of medical malpractice crimes victim in Indonesia still refers to the Witness and Victim Protection Law, the Medical Practice Law, the Health Law and the Criminal Code and the view that the imposition of criminal sanctions for medical malpractice perpetrators is considered a form of providing legal protection against victims, and another form of fulfilling the rights of victims is to refer to the provision of compensation. Therefore, there are imperfections in the application of victimology theory, especially the critical victimology approach in the provision and enforcement of legal protection for medical malpractice crimes victim in Indonesia. Keywords: Critical Victimology; Malpractice; Victim Protection
Mitigasi Risiko Bank dalam Skema Peer to Peer Lending: Kekuatan Perjanjian Kredit Dibawah Tangan Secara Elektronik Agus Prasetiyo; Soraya Yuslani Eoh; Ni Putu Tya Suindrayani
Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 10 No. 03 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2025.v10.i03.p13

Abstract

Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk menelaah bentuk risiko hukum, kekuatan hukum dalam perjanjian kredit dibawah tangan secara elektronik dan mitigasi hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh Bank sebagai lender dalam skema peer to peer lending guna mencapai kepastian hukum. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian doktrinal dengan analisis kualitatif deskriptif, serta memanfaatkan bahan hukum mencakup bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil dan pembahasan penelitian ini bahwa: Pertama, terdapat risiko perdata berupa wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum yang muncul akibat perjanjian kredit dibawah tangan secara elektronik, sedangkan risiko pidana yaitu pada pelanggaran prinsip kehati-hatian, keterlibatan tidak langsung dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang, dan pelanggaran perlindungan data pribadi. Kedua, kekuatan hukum perjanjian kredit di bawah tangan secara elektronik sah menurut KUHPerdata jo UU ITE, namun terkait pembuktian belum menjadi alat bukti yang sempurna, serta Bank sebagai lender dapat melakukan mitigasi dengan memaksimalkan strategi penerapan 5C dalam analisis kredit peer to peer lending guna mencapai kepastian hukum.
Discourse on the Role of Victim Advocates in the Concept of Plea Bargaining: Towards Restorative Justice? Suindrayani, Ni Putu Tya; Putra, Rahmat Angga Dwi; Fratama, Tomi Agi; Pa, Putri Mega Silvia
Kertha Patrika Vol. 47 No. 3 (2025): Reinterpreted Civil, Administrative, and Criminal Law into Indonesia Legal Dev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2025.v47.i03.p02

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine how the discourse on the role of victim advocates in the concept of plea bargaining as an attempt to achieve restorative justice in the adjudication of criminal cases in Indonesia. The methodology used is qualitative research with a non-doctrinal normative legal research method, as well as a regulatory and conceptual approach. The results of this study reveal a discourse on the situation of victim advocates in the current Indonesian criminal justice system, followed by a critical review of the concept of plea bargaining in the criminal justice system, and attempts to achieve restorative justice for victims by strengthening the role of victim advocates through its implementation in the concept of plea bargaining. Thus, the concept of plea bargaining not only prioritizes the interests of the defendant, but also serves as an alternative pathway to achieve recovery for victims of crime.
Co-Authors Agus Prasetiyo Fratama, Tomi Agi Pa, Putri Mega Silvia Putra, Rahmat Angga Dwi Soraya Yuslani Eoh Yurisvina Arianto, Ni Kadek Lidya