Cahya, Eka Sulistia
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE STUDY OF VOCABULARY SIZE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WHO PARTICIPATED IN ENGLISH DEBATE COMPETITION Cahya, Eka Sulistia
Journal of Teaching of English Vol 4, No 1 (2019): Journal of Teaching of English
Publisher : Universitas Halu Oleo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (147.281 KB) | DOI: 10.36709/jte.v4i1.13906

Abstract

This study was conducted to know whether there is any significant difference in vocabulary size between students who participated and those who did not participate in English debate competition. This study applied ex post facto design. The sample of this research was 30 students from 3 different schools, they were SMAN 2 Kendari, SMAN 4 Kendari, and SMAN 5 Kendari. The students were divided into two  groups  consist  of  15  students.  The  researcher  used  the  test  of New Vocabulary Level Test (NVLT) to collect the data and the data were analyzed by  using  SPSS  16.0.  The  result  showed  that  there  is  a  significant difference of the mean score of the total correct answer that students could answer which automatically affect their amount of vocabulary size. The mean score of group 1 is 104 correct answer and it is higher than group 2 which gets the mean score of the correct answer only 82. The significant value of sig(2-tailed) is 0.001, it is lower than 0.05 (sig (2-tailed) < ∝). It can be concluded that the alternative hypothesis (H1) is accepted and indicated there is a significant difference in vocabulary size between students who participated in English debate competition and   those   who   did   not   participate,   while   the   null   hypothesis   (H0)   was automatically rejected. Keywords : Debate Competition, Vocabulary Size
Transactive Criticism on Bridgerton TV Series: Norman N. Holland’s Perspective Cahya, Eka Sulistia; Siswanti, Sandra Damar
Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 19, No 2: November 2024
Publisher : Indonesian literature Program, Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/nusa.19.2.14-28

Abstract

In the new criticism, the reading process is involving both reader and the work. This study aimed to find what makes a work become popular based on readers' responses. By using the Bridgerton first series, this study was analyzed using transactive criticism by Norman N. Holland. According to Holland, in the reading process, there are 4 modalities used by the audience as the step to understand the process of making meaning in Holland’s perspective, there are defense, expectation, fantasy, and transformation. The data was gathered from the comments of the audience in IMDb. The results found that Bridgerton become popular are because of people’s interest in regency era genre, it useful as the pandemic escapism, easy plot, the curiosity of the novel’s reader, the diversity and the high rating. In watching the series, the audience has their own approach and point of view.