Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Majalah Hukum Nasional Law Development Journal Focus Journal Law Review
Andi Wahyu Wibisana
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasila
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGUATAN PERATURAN TENTANG KOMITE AUDIT GUNA MENCEGAH KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA DI BUMN Andi Wahyu Wibisana
Majalah Hukum Nasional Vol. 50 No. 1 (2020): Majalah Hukum Nasional Volume 50 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (795.43 KB) | DOI: 10.33331/mhn.v50i1.55

Abstract

Seharusnya, korupsi di BUMN tidak terjadi jika sistem pengawasan berjalan dengan baik dan optimal. Dewan komisaris atau dewan pengawas merupakan organ perusahaan BUMN yang bertanggung jawab untuk melakukan pengawas dengan dibantu oleh komite audit. Oleh karena itu, komite audit dapat menjadi kekuatan tumpuan pencegahan korupsi di BUMN. Namun, peraturan yang mengatur komite audit memiliki beberapa kelemahan. Untuk itu, perlu penguatan hukum bagi komite audit agar perannya dapat lebih optimal dalam pencegahan korupsi. Dalam penelitian ini, rumusan masalah adalah pertama, apa kelemahan peraturan tentang komite audit dan kedua, bagaimana perbaikan peraturan komite audit guna bisa mencegah kerugian keuangan negara di BUMN. Tipologi penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif, yaitu penelitian terhadap norma hukum sebagai obyeknya. Norma hukum yang menjadi obyek penelitian adalah norma hukum yang mengatur tentang komite audit. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan, peraturan yang mengatur komite audit memiliki kelemahan yang terletak pada tiga kelemahan utama, yaitu peran dan tanggungjawab komite audit, operasional komite audit, dan renumerasi komite audit. Dalam rangka penguatan peran komite audit untuk mencegah terjadinya kerugian keuangan negara di BUMN, maka kelemahan peraturan tersebut harus diperbaiki.
REPOSITIONING THE ROLE OF PUBLIC PROSECUTORS AS DOMINUS LITIS IN CORRUPTION CASES: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW IN GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT: Raden Nanda Setiawan; Reda Manthovani; Agus Surono; Andi Wahyu Wibisana
Focus Journal : Law Review Vol 5 No 2 (2025): Focus Journal Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2
Publisher : Universitas Bali Dwipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62795/fjl.v5i2.304

Abstract

This study aims to examine the urgency and potential of applying the Economic Analysis of Law Principle by the State Attorney of Indonesia in its capacity as Dominus Litis in handling corruption cases, in this case in the Government Procurement sector. This study aims to determine the policy related to the authority of the State Attorney as Dominus Litis in handling corruption cases in government procurement. This research is a normative legal study, as well as a case approach using illustrations of corruption cases related to government procurement of goods and services. This approach aims to build the author's legal argument through a review of cases related to the issues to be examined in this paper. Therefore, this research uses a descriptive approach in the form of prescriptive research. The results of this study are the existing conditions of the role of the Public Prosecutor as Dominus Litis to be applied in handling corruption cases in government procurement of goods and services, because the Public Prosecutor has been ineffective in considering the economic value of a prosecution policy. The repositioning of the role of the Public Prosecutor is necessary so that they do not only focus on formal and material evidence, but also consider the social and economic costs. The implications of the Economic Analysis of Law approach reveal that efforts to recover state losses and long-term prevention are more important than current criminalization.  
Legal Strategies For Preventing Corruption In The Procurement Of Goods And Services At State-Owned Enterprises Wahyu Wibisana, Andi
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.1.96-123

Abstract

The procurement of goods and services within state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is the sector in Indonesia with the most widespread and recurring corruption, with state losses due to procurement corruption surging from Rp5.3 trillion between 2016 and 2020 to Rp43.33 trillion between 2021 and 2023. The absence of a decrease in corruption figures despite the ongoing strengthening of anti-corruption regulations indicates a fundamental gap in SOE procurement governance. The core issue is the absence of a comprehensive, integrated, and legally binding prevention strategy. At the same time, SOE boards of directors have the full authority to establish procurement procedures independently without equivalent accountability standards. This study employs a normative-dogmatic legal methodology. The findings reveal that procurement fraud in SOEs occurs systematically across all stages of the procurement cycle and across sectors. Furthermore, it is found that fraud prevention fails due to a ‘trifragmentation’ of the system, which undermines the substance of regulations by containing normative gaps, a supervisory structure co-opted by conflicts of interest, and an internal legal culture that is permissive towards gratification. The discussion concludes that the most coherent academic response is to formulate a single binding legal instrument that closes every fraud loophole at every layer of the procurement cycle, restores the independence of internal oversight, and institutionalises anti-corruption cultural transformation as a corporate obligation.
Co-Authors Agus Surono Raden Nanda Setiawan Reda Manthovani