Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Business, Law, and Education International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM)
Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Protection for Substitute Notaries in Civil Court Proceedings Obrien Kaawoan, Yeremia; Aju Wisnuwardhani, Dyah; Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 6 No 3 (2024): IJIERM Edition September
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v6i3.364

Abstract

In carrying out their duties as Substitute Notaries, the obligation to adhere to the law is imperative as stipulated in the legislation, serving as a foundation for fulfilling their responsibilities. According to Article 65 of Law No. 2 of 2014 on the Position of Notary, it is stated that a Notary, Substitute Notary, and Temporary Notary Officer are accountable for every deed they draw up, even after the Notarial Protocol has been handed over or transferred to the custodian of the Notarial Protocol. Therefore, a Substitute Notary must be legally responsible for the deeds they prepare in judicial processes. This is because the deeds created by a Substitute Notary are authentic deeds made by an authorized official and hold evidentiary power in court. In performing their duties as Substitute Notaries in drawing up authentic deeds, there is a possibility of legal issues arising concerning the deeds they create, which may result in the Substitute Notary becoming entangled in legal problems. The Notary Honorary Council (Majelis Kehormatan Notaris) is an institution that exercises authority in providing guidance to Notaries and has the duty to grant approval for Notaries in judicial processes. The obligation to obtain approval from the Notary Honorary Council for Notaries is a form of legal protection for Notaries, as outlined in Article 66 paragraph 1 of the Notary Law. This legal protection is aimed at maintaining the dignity of the Notary profession and safeguarding the interests of the parties involved in legal acts within the deeds. The urgency in this matter lies in Article 66 paragraph 1 of the Notary Law, where the Notary Honorary Council has the authority to grant approval to Investigators, Public Prosecutors, and Judges to conduct examinations and obtain the original deed (Minuta) from the Notary, due to the Notary's obligation to keep the deeds they draw up confidential. To address this issue, a research method is necessary, and the method employed in this research is the Normative Juridical method, which refers to a scientific research method used to find the truth based on the legal logic from a normative perspective.The conclusion drawn from this research is that there is a legal vacuum concerning the regulation of Article 66 paragraph 1 with respect to Substitute Notaries in civil judicial processes.
Predatory Pricing Competition Through E-commerce Platforms: Eliminating or Destroying? (A Review Based on the Theory of Harm) Sinaga, Paris Hendra Wijaya; Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif; Eta Widyanti, Yenny
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 1 (2025): IJIERM Edition January
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i1.431

Abstract

Persaingan harga predator melalui platform e-commerce telah menjadi perhatian khusus di era digital. Predatory pricing mengacu pada praktik penetapan harga di bawah standar untuk “menghilangkan atau menghancurkan” pesaing, yang secara signifikan berdampak pada pasar dan konsumen. Oleh karena itu, tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengeksplorasi dan menganalisis tolok ukur ambang batas “menghilangkan atau menghancurkan” dalam strategi predatory pricing dengan menggunakan kerangka teori kerugian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, teori, dan studi kasus. Kekuatan dari penelitian ini terletak pada penyediaan solusi praktis untuk mengatasi masalah yang ada, sehingga memberikan kontribusi yang berarti di lapangan. Temuan ini menyoroti pentingnya teori kerugian dalam menganalisis pola untuk mendeteksi harga pasar yang menentukan apakah pesaing sedang “dihilangkan” atau “dihancurkan”, yang dapat membahayakan pasar dalam konteks digital. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menggarisbawahi pentingnya mencegah praktik predatory pricing untuk memastikan persaingan yang sehat di platform e-commerce.Kata Kunci: Persaingan Usaha, Harga Predator, Platform E-Commerce, Indonesia Predatory pricing competition through e-commerce platforms has become a specific concern in the digital era. Predatory pricing refers to the practice of setting prices below standard to "eliminate or destroy" competitors, which significantly impacts the market and consumers. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore and analyze the benchmarks for the "eliminate or destroy" threshold in predatory pricing strategies using the framework of the theory of harm. This study employs a normative juridical method, utilizing statutory, conceptual, theoretical, and case study approaches. The strength of this study lies in its provision of practical solutions to address existing issues, thereby contributing meaningfully to the field. The findings highlight the importance of the theory of harm in analyzing patterns to detect market prices that determine whether a competitor is being "eliminated" or "destroyed," which could harm the market in the digital context. Furthermore, it underscores the necessity of preventing predatory pricing practices to ensure fair competition on e-commerce platforms.Keywords: Competition, Predatory Pricing, Platform E-Commerce, Indonesia
REGULATION OF LOSS-INDUCING CRYPTO ASSET INVESTMENTS: CHALLENGES IN REGULATION, PROTECTION AND SUPERVISION Anggasta, Giovani; Kusumadara, Afifah; Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v4i2.255

Abstract

Cryptocurrency has become evidence of the rapid growth of the digital economy. This phenomenon has left countries worldwide in a dilemma regarding the legal status of cryptocurrencies. Specifically in Indonesia, cryptocurrency is regulated in a limited manner, creating a gap in legal protection for investors. This research employs a normative research method with a legislative and conceptual approach. The findings of this research indicate that Indonesia tends to position cryptocurrencies in a "limited" capacity, restricting them to being considered investments rather than currency. Nevertheless, due to the legal gaps, there is a need to establish standardized, periodic, and embedded security measures overseen by Bappebti to ensure maximum protection provided by every cryptocurrency wallet service provider. Additionally, it should be mandatory for every service provider to comprehensively insure digital assets to offer financial protection to individuals.
Co-Authors Afifah Kusumadara Aju Wisnuwardhani, Dyah Eta Widyanti, Yenny Giovani Anggasta Obrien Kaawoan, Yeremia Sinaga, Paris Hendra Wijaya