Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Progressive Law Review

THE URGENCY OF DIGITAL VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT TO EMPOWER VILLAGE AUTONOMY isharyanto
Progressive Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): November
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/plr.v6i2.163

Abstract

Based on Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, village authority is village autonomy and villages are seen as having a fairly large role in providing public services for the community. Along with the development of information and communication technology, a transformation towards a Digital Village must be carried out. This article is the result of legal doctrine research by prioritizing data in library materials. Sources of information are obtained through regulations and scientific publications that are relevant to the research topic. Based on research, social contractual utilitarianism is the philosophical basis for digital transformation in village government and to realize a Digital Village must meet the following requirements. First, participatory, that is, it is prepared with the agreement of the residents and is in line with development plans in the Regency. Second, there is a need for a legal basis in the form of a Village Regulation on Digital Villages which is in accordance with the village development plan and describes the character that the Village wants to develop. Third, have a road map in the form of stages for developing a Digital Village.
Legal Framework for Integrating Crop and Livestock Farming with Sus-tainable Development in Indonesian Laws isharyanto; Deva Mahendra Caesar Bimantya
Progressive Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v7i1.289

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal framework governing crop-livestock integration in Indonesia and it’s alignment with sustainable development principles. Although the Food Law, the Livestock and Animal Health Law, and the Evironmental Protection and Management Law recognize sustainability and the use of local resources, they don’t provide operational guidance for integrating crops and livestock. The research finds regulatory fragmentation: livestock manure is legally treated as waste rather than a soil nutrient, forage production is not mandated within livestock enterprises, and extension services operate under separate sectoral structures. Comparative analysis of Malaysia, Thailand, and India demonstrates that successful integration that support nutrient cycling and smallholder autonomy. This research purposes three core elements for legal reform: recognizing livestock manure as an agricultural resource, requiring forage production plans, and unifying agricultural extension under a single village-level farming plan. Strengthening these provisions would create a cohesive legal basis for sustainable crop-livestock systems and reinforce food security for smallholder farmers.