Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Preferred Online Learning Method during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Students’ Perspective Alfelia Nugky Permatasari; Unan Yusmaniar Oktiawati
PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education Vol 11, No 1 (2021): Volume 11 Number 1 April 2021
Publisher : Master Program in Linguistics, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/parole.v11i1.1-9

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic has been causing a massive disruption towards human life including interactions within education. Traditional learning activity in classes must be transformed into online learning to support physical distancing. This urge leads to tension, not only experienced by educators in general, but also by students. This paper aims to evaluate online learning done during the second half of even semester 2019/2020 and to find out the preferred online learning method from the students’ perspective. A number of Universitas Gadjah Mada students became the respondents answering closed and open questions related to the topic. The results show that students also experienced confusion during the process and preferred learning method which includes independent learning with prepared materials followed by virtual discussions and quizzes.
Hedging In Ted Talks: A Corpus-Based Pragmatic Study Tri Nuraniwati; Alfelia Nugky Permatasari
JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021): JEELS November 2021
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syekh Wasil, Kediri, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/jeels.v8i2.2969

Abstract

Hedging is a communicative strategy and a form of pragmatic competence which plays a central role in delivering the intended message of the speaker. Commonly observed in two-way conversations, hedges as hedging devices are also present in monologues. This study investigates the most common hedges used in popular monologues TED Talks as well as observes the various communicative strategies they denote. 130 transcripts of the talks, taped from 2002-2019 taken from the official website of TED (ted.com), are collected to build a corpus of 337,302 tokens. Through corpus-based analysis using concordance software AntConc 3.5.0, 48 most common hedges are inserted for frequency search. The search hits show that the most frequently-used hedges in the corpus are ‘just,’ ‘could,’ ‘you know,’ ‘actually,’ ‘I think,’ and ‘kind of’ with the numbers of occurrence 1107, 554, 541, 530, 390, and 309 respectively. From the analyses of the functions of the most frequent hedges, it can be concluded that each of the hedges serves distinctive pragmatic strategy which contributes in the communicative processes of the talks.
Language Use and Media Framing in the Pertamina Corruption Case in National and International Media Alfelia Nugky Permatasari; Erlin Estiana Yuanti
Jurnal ASPIKOM - Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Vol 11, No 1 (2026): Jurnal ASPIKOM
Publisher : Asosiasi Pendidikan Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi (ASPIKOM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24329/aspikom.v11i1.1709

Abstract

The mass media plays a crucial role in shaping public perceptions of corruption through language choices and framing strategies. This study examines how The Jakarta Post and Reuters reported the Pertamina corruption case using linguistic and framing analysis. A qualitative Thematic Analysis supported by ATLAS.ti was applied to identify dominant themes, guided by Media Framing theories. The dataset comprised online news articles published within six months of the report, February-July 2025, each exceeding 200 words and focusing explicitly on the case. The findings reveal that The Jakarta Post employed moral and social framing centered on public accountability, while Reuters adopted legal and institutional framing emphasizing procedural neutrality and institutional credibility. These contrasts highlight differing orientations and journalistic functions: The Jakarta Post aligns with advocacy-driven national media, whereas Reuters represents objectivity-centered international journalism.