Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Pengaruh Marketing Mix Terhadap Penjualan (Studi Pada Toko Pakaian Bekas Remaja) Kurniawan, Denis; Sulistyawati, Lisa
Jurnal Bisnis Indonesia Vol 11, No 02 (2020): Jurnal Bisnis Indonesia
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Keputusan pemasaran seringkali berkaitan erat dengan empat masalah pokok, yakni produk, harga, tempat, dan promosi yang merupakan varibel-variabel dalam marketing mix. Dalam memilih sebuah produk konsumen tentunya memiliki kriteria evaluasi diantaranya bagaimana kualitas produk, harga serta pelayanan yang diberikan dan tentunya marketing yang baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan melihat seberapa pengaruhnya marketingmix terhadap penjualan pada toko pakaian bekas di kota Surabaya. Teknik pengumpulan datanya dengan menggunakan kuesioner, populasi dalam penelitian ini para konsumen yang datang dan membeli pakaian bekas toko, sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 40 responden. Pengambilan sampelnya, menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dimana konsumen yang memeli pakaian bekas. Teknik analisis data dan uji hipotesis menggunakan analisis regresi linier berga ndadimana untuk menentukan ketepatan prediksi dan pengaruh yang terjadi antara variabel independen dan dependen. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa secara simultan (Uji F) variabel bebas Product (X1), Price (X2), Place (X3), Promotion (X4) secara simultan bersama-sama mempunyai pengaruh terhadap variabel terikat Tingkat penjualan (Y) pada toko pakaian bekas Senja SecondBrand. Sementara itu secara parsial (uji T) variabel yang berpengaruh secara signifikan adalah Product dan Price, sedangkan Place dan Promotion memiliki pengaruh tetapi tidak signifikan terhadap keputusan konsumen dan tingkat penjualan pada toko pakaian bekas Senja SecondBrand.Kata kunci : Marketing mix, Penjualan

Absolute Competence and Judicial Activism in the Role of the Supreme Court in Reviewing Political Party Bylaws in Indonesia Kurniawan, Denis
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

This article examines the necessity for the Supreme Court to extend its absolute competence in conducting judicial reviews (right to judicial review) of the Articles of Association and/or Bylaws of Political Parties, which serve as the object of review (objectum litis). This article was prepared by doctrinal research methods. Political parties are institutions that are known for their existence, authority, and constitutional dissolution through the 1945 Constitution. As such, the Articles of Association and Bylaws of Political Parties can be defined as regulations that are established by a Political Party based on orders from higher legal norms, namely the law. It is imperative that the content and procedures for the formation of political parties do not conflict with the legal norms. Accordingly, in the event of a discrepancy between the Articles of Association and/or Bylaws of a Political Party and higher statutory regulations, the Supreme Court, as a judicial control institution, is responsible for determining the validity of the legal norm. The request for a review of amendments to the 2020 Democratic Party's Articles of Association and/or Bylaws, as presented in case Number 39 P/HUM/2021, was not addressed by the Supreme Court in a comprehensive manner. A review should have been conducted in a gradual manner, through the implementation of legal innovations (i.e., rule-breaking measures) aimed at safeguarding the constitutional rights of citizens, which have been disregarded and violated by the enactment of a political party's articles of association and/or bylaws.

KEKUASAAN PERADILAN MILITER MENGADILI WARGA SIPIL DALAM TINJAUAN HUKUM TATA NEGARA DARURAT Kurniawan, Denis
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 52, No. 4
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract Military Courts in general are courts devoted to dealing with cases of military soldiers, both concerning criminal matters, military administration, and claims for compensation as a result of criminal offenses. The special nature of military justice is due to the fact that military soldiers have different traditions from civil society regarding the existence of military discipline in their activities, and there are acts that are only known within the military environment, but are not generally applicable. However, a military court in an emergency situation that threatens to be projected as the last court, if the existing judiciary is to handle the interests of civil society, does not have a function in exercising its authority. This research is a normative legal research using a conceptual approach, which relies on the method of literature study or documentation in finding related data and answering research questions. In normal situations, military courts can try civilians who have the same status as "soldiers", as well as civilians who work for the armed forces and hold military secrets, based on a decision from the Military Commander. Military courts in dangerous conditions can be justified as a last resort if the existing judiciary does not carry out its functions, this is done to always be oriented towards upholding the rule of law in any condition and situation.

Penggunaan Strict Liability Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Secara Perdata Pada Sengketa KLHK Melawan PT. Waringin Agro Jaya Kurniawan, Denis
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 6, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v6i1.39129

The right to access a good and healthy environment is a right for all citizens guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution. The right to obtain a good and healthy environment is not only limited by the rights of the current generation but also a right that future generations can feel with pro-environment sustainable development. The state's right to sue the central government through the Ministry of Environment and Forestry is an effort to protect the environment from polluters and/or environmental destroyers, one of which is filing a civil lawsuit. This research is a normative or doctrinal legal research with a statute, conceptual, and case approach. This study concludes that the legal liability carried out by PT Waringin Agro Jaya can be justified based on strict liability because, in principle, strict liability is a liability without fault in every business or activity categorized as Abnormally Dangerous Activity.

Judicial Activism Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menguji Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Kurniawan, Denis
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 21, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - September 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v21i3.1158

ABSTRAKMahkamah Konstitusi merupakan lembaga amanat reformasi yang berfungsi sebagai guardian of constitution dengan kewenangannya dalam menguji konstitusionalitas suatu undang-undang, dan sudah banyak putusan mahkamah konstitusi yang pada akhirnya membatalkan suatu produk hukum dari parlemen yakni undang-undang. Sejumlah putusan mahkamah konstitusi senantiasa mendapatkan perhatian publik, seperti halnya dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009, untuk pertama kalinya mahkamah konstitusi dinilai berwenang menguji peraturan pemerintah pengganti undang-undang. Putusan tersebut menimbulkan polemik di tengah masyarakat, dan menimbulkan pertanyaan, mengenai keabsahan berwenang atau tidaknya mahkamah mengadili perkara a quo. Artikel ini ditulis meggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual atas ide dasar mengenai peradilan konstitusi, peraturan pemerintah pengganti undang-undang dan judicial activism, yang nantinya akan memberikan kesimpulan mengenai keabsahan kewenangan mahkamah dalam mengadili perkara peraturan pemerintah pengganti undang-undang, yang dilihat dari segi kebutuhan untuk melakukan pencegahan atas kerugian hak konstitusional warga negara, dan ini sebagai implementasi dari fungsi mahkamah konstitusi yang lain sebagai the protector of human rights. Kata Kunci: Mahkamah Konstitusi; Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang; Judicial Activism. ABSTRACTThe Constitutional Court is a reform mandate institution that functions as the guardian of the constitution with its authority to review the constitutionality of a law, and there have been many decisions of constitutional courts which in the end annulled a legal product from parliament, namely a law. A number of decisions of the constitutional court always receive public attention, as is the case in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 138/PUU-VII/2009, for the first time the constitutional court was deemed authorized to review government regulations in lieu of laws. The decision created a polemic in the community, and raised questions about the legitimacy of the authority or not of the court to try the a quo case. This article was written using normative legal research with a conceptual approach to the basic ideas of constitutional justice, government regulations in lieu of laws and judicial activism, which will later provide conclusions regarding the legitimacy of the court's authority in adjudicating cases of government regulations in lieu of laws, viewed from the perspective of the need to prevent the loss of citizens' constitutional rights, and this is an implementation of another function of the constitutional court as the protector of human rights.Keywords: The Constitutional Court; Government Regulation in lieu of law; Judicial Activism.

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search