p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Independent
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

SOLAR VEHICLES FROM ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PERSPECTIVE TJAHJANI, JOEJOEN; NAHDLIYAH, HADZIQOTUN
Jurnal Independent Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Independent
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v10i2.177

Abstract

ABSTRACTSolar powered vehicles are important as a form of protection for the environment, apartfrom being a solution to the problem of vehicle exhaust pollution, they are also an innovationin the use of environmentally friendly new and renewable energy (EBT). The use of solar powerin vehicles from an environmental law perspective still requires consistency and legal certaintyso that there is a clearer footing for investors, as well as the ability to compete with othercountries, as expected in the EBT Bill.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL RESTRAINT AND ACTIVISM ON THE MATERIAL REVIEW OF PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NAHDLIYAH, HADZIQOTUN; SASTRADINATA, DHEVINAYASARI; WINARNO, JATMIKO; TJAHJANI, JOEJOEN; YANTO, M.
Jurnal Independent Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Independent
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v11i1.213

Abstract

AbstractThe doctrine of Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism has become a debate indemocraticcountriesondecisionsrelatedtothepresidentialnominationthreshold(presidential threshold) made by the Constitutional Court. In the application of judicialrestraint, judges are more self-limiting in deciding a case and are more restrained in theirauthority, in contrast to judicial activism which is more active and brave in providing newlegal breakthroughs on the norms being tested. In this paper, the formulation of the problemto be discussed is How the Decision of the Constitutional Court Judges Applying the Doctrineof Judicial Restraint Against the Presidential Threshold Lawsuit in the Presidential Electionand the Development of Democracy in Indonesia and How the Relationship between theDecision of the Constitutional Court Judges Using the Doctrine of Judicial Activism Againstthe Presidential Threshold Lawsuit in the Presidential Election and the Development ofDemocracy in Indonesia. This paper also uses normative legal research methods, which is aprocess to analyze legal rules, legal principles and legal doctrines. The problem approach inthis writing is the statute approach and conceptual approach.
The principle of Restorative Justice in sentencingIn the 2023 Criminal Code Ningtias, Ayu Dian; Nahdliyah, Hadziqotun; Nugroho, Fajar Seto
Jurnal Independent Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Independent
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v11i2.264

Abstract

Abstract the concept and analysis of the regulation of the principles of restorative justice in the 2023 Criminal Code is a solution for imposing sentences on minor criminal cases and avoiding short-term imprisonment, as well as preventing this. Application of the principle that the aim is to prevent people from being punished. This is for protection and is seen in society as an effort to rehabilitate the perpetrator. By upholding a sense of justice and the benefits of the law, as well as Pancasila values ​​in law enforcement and criminal objectives, implementing the principle of judge's forgiveness in the 2023 Criminal Code means that there are defendants who have not been found guilty or served a sentence, even though their charges have been legally and convincingly proven.
Judicial Pardon as an Alternative to a Judge's Decision Ningtias, Ayu Dian; Nahdliyah, Hadziqotun; Shofa, Ahmad Faris
Jurnal Independent Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Independent
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v13i1.365

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a new concept in the renewal of criminal law, namely judicial pardon, this concept is also adopted by the Dutch legal system, in simple terms where the judge can forgive the defendant who is legally and convincingly proven to have committed a criminal offense. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the legal consequences of the enactment of the principle of judicial pardon in the Criminal Code 2023. From this research, the author analyzes that the legal consequences of the enactment of the principle of judicial pardon will largely have an impact on the character and nature of Indonesian criminal justice, and also has the potential to be one of the solutions to the current overcrowding problem. But the regulation of judicial pardon is still less specific, it also needs to be regulated in the Draft of the Criminal Procedure Code, such as in the form of a judicial pardon decision, there needs to be confirmation of the terms of judicial pardon, and it is also necessary to set limits or signs in order to obtain legal certainty and later not become a rubber article or become a multi-interpretation among judges.
Legal Protection for the Owner of Brand Rights According to Law Number 20 / 2016 of Trademark and Geographical Indication (Trademark And Geographical Indication) Nahdliyah, Hadziqotun; Khitam, Muhammad Chusnul; Fitri, Rika Izatul
Jurnal Independent Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Independent
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v13i1.368

Abstract

ABSTRACT According to Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, brand owners must register their brands with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property in order to maintain healthy, fair business competition and obtain legal protection. Based on the background above, the author proposes a problem formulation, namely how is the legal protection for brand rights holders according to Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications? This research method uses a normative legal research type, with a statute approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials which include: Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications and Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that legal protection of brand rights has been regulated in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The law explains that brands will get their rights to obtain protection and legal certainty on the condition that the brand must be registered first. If an irresponsible party is found using another person's brand without the knowledge and permission of the original owner of the brand, then this is included in brand imitation. The parties who do this can be threatened with criminal or civil charges.
Legal Review of Embezzlement of Funds in Corporate Crimes Sastradinata, Dhevi Nayasari; Nahdliyah, Hadziqotun; Sidiq, Kidung Alfiani
Jurnal Independent Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Independet
Publisher : Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/ji.v12i2.379

Abstract

ABSTRACT One prevalent form of criminal offense within society is embezzlement, and this crime continues to occur across various sectors of society, spanning individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds. This research aims to examine how embezzlement of funds is regulated within a corporation and to explore the accountability of embezzlers in corporate crimes. The study employs a juridical normative method, utilizing primary legal resources. The findings indicate that implementing direct criminal accountability on public corporations in the context of embezzlement unveils several relevant considerations. Placing public corporations as entities directly responsible for criminal acts sends a strong signal that any unlawful actions will not be tolerated, regardless of the perpetrators within the corporation. Involving senior officials or corporate leaders in criminal accountability encourages transparency and accountability within the corporate leadership structure, emphasizing the importance of integrity in decision-making processes. The restitution of rights for aggrieved victims emerges as a key aspect in addressing embezzlement crimes.