Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA) Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unpatti ATOM : Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Amalgamasi: Journal of Mathematics and Applications
Ngilawajan, Darma A
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)

 1 
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA PADA MATERI SISTEM PERSAMAAN LINEAR TIGA VARIABEL Kinyari, Henry R; Laamena, Christina M; Ngilawajan, Darma A
Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA) Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA)
Publisher : Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Pascasarjana Universitas Pattimura Ambon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/jumadikavol7iss1year2025page107-114

Abstract

This research is a qualitative descriptive study that aims to find out the types of errors made by students in completing the story of a three-variable system of equations in class X SMA Negeri 4 Maluku Tengah. This research was conducted in class X-2 of SMA Negeri 4 Maluku Tengah for the academic year 2021/2022 from May to June 2022. The data collection techniques used were tests, interviews and documentation. The research instrument is the researcher, the test sheet about the story of the three-variable linear equation system, guidelines and interviews. Data analysis test results to find out the types of errors in accordance with the procedure New people include comprehension error, transformation errors, process skills and encoding errors. The selection of subjects to be interviewed was 3 students, including 1 student with high ability, 1 student with moderate ability and 1 student with low ability. Of the three, based on the results of the interview, it was found that those with high abilities only made mistakes on question number 1, where the indicators of understanding errors and writing the final explanation were, while subjects with medium and low abilities made errors indicators on each question. The main thing that causes the emergence of some differences, because the ability of different subjects so that the ability to analyze is also different
Co-Authors Ayal, Carolina S Christina Martha Laamena Dolsenyawi, Freddy Alstonia Erfiani, Erni Jacob, Ledya Priskila Kinyari, Henry R La Moma Loiulro, Rolina Ratumanan, Tanwey G Reawaruw, Linda M Welmintje Mataheru