Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEM RESEARCH (JOSH)

Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Metode ROC dan ARAS dalam Seleksi Tim Kreatif Industri Sholeha, Puspa Ayu; Aldisa, Rima Tamara
Journal of Information System Research (JOSH) Vol 5 No 2 (2024): Januari 2024
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi (FKPT)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/josh.v5i2.4752

Abstract

The process of selecting creative team members in the creative industry poses complex challenges. While aspects of formal and technical qualifications can often be clearly measured, elements such as creativity, innovation, and cultural fit are subjective factors that are difficult to measure objectively. Conventional selection methods are often not able to fully incorporate these qualitative aspects, which sometimes results in less precise or less than ideal evaluations. The criteria used in the selection of creative industry teams are portfolio, experience, innovation, technical skills, and collaboration. This emphasizes the need for research and development of more sophisticated and scalable selection methods in the context of the creative industry. The use of a Decision Support System (DSS) is the main focus for handling the problem. applying the ROC (Rank Order Centroid) method, which is utilized to give weight values to the selection criteria, and ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment), which is utilized to provide the results of creative team selection decisions in the creative industry. The results of the study show that Lolly gets the highest score, which is 1.00000, and is selected as the most suitable creative team for the creative industry.
Perbandingan Algoritma K-Means dan K-Medoids Dalam Pengelompokan Kelas Untuk Mahasiswa Baru Program Magister Faran, Jhiro; Aldisa, Rima Tamara
Journal of Information System Research (JOSH) Vol 5 No 2 (2024): Januari 2024
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi (FKPT)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/josh.v5i2.4753

Abstract

This research discusses a comparison of two grouping algorithms, namely K-Means and K-Medoids, in the context of class grouping for new master's program students. Choosing the right clustering algorithm can help universities optimize resource allocation and maximize student learning experiences. K-Means is a popular clustering algorithm, which works by dividing data into a number of homogeneous groups based on the distance between data points and the cluster center. Meanwhile, K-Medoids is a variation of K-Means that uses actual data points as a cluster representation, which makes it more resistant to outliers. This research involves a dataset of new master's program students which includes various attributes, such as entrance exam scores, educational background, and major preferences. The comparison results between K-Means and K-Medoids were carried out by considering clustering evaluation metrics such as SSE (Sum of Squared Errors) and Silhouette Score. Experimental results show that the performance of K-Means and K-Medoids differs depending on the characteristics of the dataset. K-Means tends to produce more homogeneous groups, but is more sensitive to outliers. In contrast, K-Medoids tend to be more stable in dealing with outliers, but may produce less homogeneous groups. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate clustering algorithm should be based on the specific goals and characteristics of the new master's program student population. This research provides valuable insight for colleges in planning the allocation of classes, mentors, and other resources for new students. The right decisions in class grouping can increase student retention, learning satisfaction, and academic success. In addition, this research also stimulates further discussion in combining different clustering methods to achieve more optimal results in grouping classes of new master's program students.
Penerapan Metode Multi Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dalam Penentuan Pembimbing Skripsi Terbaik Nasution, Aisah Amini; Aldisa, Rima Tamara; Mesran, Mesran; Fadillah, Rizkah
Journal of Information System Research (JOSH) Vol 5 No 2 (2024): Januari 2024
Publisher : Forum Kerjasama Pendidikan Tinggi (FKPT)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47065/josh.v5i2.4803

Abstract

The first step in thesis preparation involves titling and selecting a supervisor. Choosing the best supervisors aims to enhance both lecturers' enthusiasm and the quality of student guidance. To identify the most suitable lecturer, thorough consideration and a decision-support system are essential. In this research, the authors employed the Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) method as a technique integrated into the decision support system. This method aids in determining attribute weight values and the ranking process, ultimately selecting the most favorable supervisor from various available options. From the results of the application of the MOORA method in knowing the best thesis supervisor, namely on alternative A8 with a value of 0.3288 on behalf of Marigan Sianturi, SE, and M.kom,