Maing, Skolastika Genapang
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PROSES NEGOSIASI KONFLIK PAPUA: DIALOG JAKARTA-PAPUA Kaisupy, Delvia Ananda; Maing, Skolastika Genapang
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 10, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jish-undiksha.v10i1.27056

Abstract

Konflik Papua merupakan konflik vertikal dan berlangsung lebih dari 50 tahun. Penyebab utama konflik ini adalah keinginan untuk “Papua Merdeka” yang diperjuangkan oleh Organisasi Papua Merdeka (OPM). Konflik ini juga semakin memanas dengan keberadaan Freeport serta isu rasial dan diskriminasi terhadap mahasiswa Papua di Surabaya dan Malang pada bulan agustus 2019. Negosiasi menjadi pilihan terbaik Pemerintah Indonesia untuk resolusi konflik di Papua. Tujuan utama artikel ini adalah untuk memahami proses negosiasi konflik Papua terkait aktor, tuntutan dan proses negosiasi dengan menggunakan teori negosiasi. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif, dimana penelitian dilakukan terhadap fenomena sosial masyarakat yang secara wajar dan alamiah terjadi tanpa adanya rekayasa atau laboratoris. Pendekatan ini memberikan data-data yang sifatnya deskriptif berupa perkataan tertulis atau lisan yang menggambarkan berbagai kondisi dan situasi atau variabel tertentu. Teknik pengumpulan data adalah dengan menggunakan studi literatur untuk memperoleh data yang dibutuhkan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses negosiasi konflik Papua melibatkan aktor internal (pemerintah pusat/daerah, KKB/OPM, kepala suku/tokoh agama dan masyarakat sipil) dan aktor eksternal (Freeport) dengan tuntutan utama adalah Papua merdeka. Proses negosiasi berlangsung lama dan menghadapi banyak kendala, namun hal ini akan terus diusahakan untuk mendapatkan keputusan yang bersifat win-win solution. Dialog antara Jakarta-Papua harus lebih mencerminkan nilai-nilai budaya orang Papua.
Dinamika Integrasi Lokal Warga Eks Timor Timur di Wilayah Pemukiman Pengungsi Kabupaten Kupang Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur Maing, Skolastika Genapang; Jatmika, Sidik
Indonesian Perspective Vol 6, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2021), hlm. 1-122
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v6i1.37512

Abstract

This article examines the dynamics of the method local integration of ex-East Timorese residents in the refugee settlement area of Kupang Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province.The author uses the Functional Theory by Talcott Parsons and the Local Integration concept by UNHCR as set out in Refugee Convention 1951. While related to research method, the author uses qualitative methods with descriptive approaches and secondary data. The results showed that the implementation of local integration of ex-East Timorese was not as expected. This is due to obstacles in every level of the local integration process, both related to legality, economy and socio-culture. Social harmony between local residents and ex-refugees isn’t always become the commitment of the central and regional governments, but requires the role of the informal sector, especially local communities at refugee settlement areas. The process of local integration that is not going well can lead to social conflict in the community.
Dilema Tata Kelola Pengungsi Global: Penanganan Illegal Maritime Arrivals (IMA) di Australia Maing, Skolastika Genapang
Nation State: Journal of International Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Department of International Relations, Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24076/NSJIS.2020v3i2.203

Abstract

Australia as one of the countries that signed the Convention of Refugee 1951 has an obligation to apply principle of non-refoulement in the handling of refugees and asylum seekers entering its territory. However, the issue of national security and domestic turmoil caused Australia to continue use restrictive policies in dealing with refugees and asylum seekers, especially those who came by the sea (boat people) and did not have official documents. They are called Illegal Maritime Arrivals (IMA). Giving the term “illegal” causes no distinction between IMA and smuggling/trafficking criminals. This paper aims to explain the existence of dilemma in the management of refugees especially in Australia in handling IMA. This research uses qualitative methods with secondary data sources from books, journals, articles and other sources related to the problem being studied. By using the concept of securitization approach in the paradigm of constructivism, this paper argue that the restrictive policies adopted by Australia as a form of protection of national interests. Australia experiences a dilemma in applying the principle of non-refoulement and protecting its national interests. This is challenge in the management of global refugees.