Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM PIDANA DOKTER SPESIALIS KANDUNGAN DAN KEBIDANAN PADA KASUS PASIEN DENGAN KELAINAN KONGENITAL Setiaji, Sigit; ,, Isharyanto; Sulistiyono, Adi
HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI Vol 6, No 2 (2018): JULI - DESEMBER
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/hpe.v6i2.17732

Abstract

AbstractThis paper analyzes the criminal liability of obstetricians and gynecologists in case of patients with congenital abnormalities. Congenital abnormalities in the patient cause the baby to be born disabled. Such circumstances cause the patient to suspect that there has been a medical malpractice in the medical treatment provided by obstetricians and gynecologists. This paper is a normative legal research that is prescriptive with the approach of law and conceptual approach. Techniques of collecting legal materials using literature studies and techniques of analysis of legal materials using methods of deduction. This paper concludes that the case of patients with congenital abnormalities is not a medical malpractice, but rather a medical risks. There is no causality between the medical treatment given by the obstetrician and gynecologists with the congenital abnormalities suffered by the patient. Criminal liability can not be applied to this case. This paper recommends the addition of provisions medical malpractice and medical risks in Law No. 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice to provide legal certainty to the medical profession and patients in the practice of health services.Keywords: congenital abnormalities, criminal liability, obstetrician and gynecologists, patient. AbstrakTulisan ini menganalisis pertanggungjawaban hukum pidana dokter spesialis kandungan dan kebidanan pada kasus pasien dengan kelainan kongenital. Kelainan kongenital pada pasien menyebabkan bayi terlahir cacat. Keadaan demikian menyebabkan pasien menduga bahwa telah terjadi malpraktek medis pada tindakan medis yang diberikan oleh dokter spesialis kandungan dan kebidanan. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskiptif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum menggunakan studi pustaka dan teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode deduksi. Tulisan ini menyimpulkan bahwa kasus pasien dengan kelainan kongenital bukan merupakan malpraktek medis, melainkan resiko medis. Tidak terdapat kausalitas antara tindakan medis yang diberikan oleh dokter spesialis kandungan dan kebidanan dengan kelainan kongenital yang diderita pasien. Pertanggungjawaban hukum pidana tidak dapat diterapkan pada kasus ini. Tulisan ini merekomendasikan ditambahkannya ketentuan yang mengatur tentang malpraktek medis dan resiko medis di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktek Kedokteran untuk memberikan kepastian hukum pada profesi kedokteran maupun pasien dalam praktek penyelenggaraan pelayanan kesehatan.Kata kunci: dokter spesialis kandungan dan kebidanan, kelainan kongenital, pertanggungjawaban hukum pidana, pasien.
The role and position of the indonesian medical discipline honorary council in the fair resolution of medical disputes Setiaji, Sigit; Isharyanto, Isharyanto; Sulistiyono, Adi
PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) Vol 5 No 1 (2023): PROCEEDINGS ICTESS: "Human Security in Multidisciplinary Perspective” (Mainstream
Publisher : Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive description of the role and position of the Medical EthicsCouncil of Indonesia (MKDKI) in facilitating the equitable resolution of medical disputes within the Indonesian context. Thepresent study constitutes a normative legal research. The research findings indicate that the resolution of medical disputes shouldbe channelled through MKDKI, as it possesses the necessary expertise in the application of professional discipline within themedical field. Furthermore, MKDKI is an authoritative institution responsible for determining whether a doctor has violatedprofessional disciplinary standards. The term "can" as stipulated in Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 29 of 2004regarding Medical Practise encompasses the possibility of either initiating a complaint against MKDKI or refraining fromdoing so. Legal confusion may occur, thus necessitating the replacement of the word "can" with "must." This implies thatcomplaints regarding medical issues must be resolved through MKDKI as a mandatory step. It is imperative to conduct ajudicial review of Article 66, paragraph (1) of Law Number 29 of 2004 pertaining to Medical Practise. Additionally, it isessential to deliberate on the authority of the Medical Council of Indonesia (MKDKI) in determining compensation for disputingparties. In order to ensure legal clarity for both medical practitioners and the general public, it is imperative that every decisionmade by the MKDKI (Medical Knowledge and Decision-making Institute) is carefully considered.Keywords: Medical Disputes; MKDKI; Doctors