Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Jurnal Yudisial Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Musa, M.
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Guidelines for Implementing Imprisonment Sentences with Single Formulation (A Critique of Book I of the National Criminal Code) Musa, M.; Zulhuda, Sonny; Endri, Endri; Susanti, Heni; Rinaldi, Kasmanto
LAW REFORM Vol 20, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v20i1.52851

Abstract

The most basic difference in the criminal system between the Criminal Code (WvS) and the National Criminal Code is the provision of sentencing guidelines. It is important to formulate guidelines for sentencing as a provision to achieve the objectives of punishment because they are related to the formulations of single and alternative penalties for criminal acts in the provisions of the National Criminal Code. This paper aims to conduct a theoretical study on the formulation of the criminal system from the guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation contained in Book I of the National Criminal Code, as a general rule that applies to Book II of the National Criminal Code and criminal law out of the National Criminal Code. The results of the study show that the formulation of criminal application guidelines with a single formulation contained in the provisions of Article 57 of the National Criminal Code theoretically does not follow the rules of the criminal system as they should. The provisions of Article 57 are placed in the 3rd paragraph to regulate "Guidelines for the Implementation of Imprisonment Sentences with a Single Formulation and Alternative Formulations." Lawmakers no longer include guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation, as previously existed in the Draft of the National Criminal Code. The consequence of not regulating the guidelines for implementing prison sentences with a single formulation is that judges cannot make flexible choices in applying sentences that are in accordance with the objectives of the sentence.
Optimizing the Role of Community Advisors in Assisting Juvenile Clients with Diversion at the Mandau Sector Police Rinaldi, Kasmanto; Yut Sepin, Fitria; Musa, M.
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5267

Abstract

This study discusses the role of community advisors in the implementation of diversion for juvenile clients at the Mandau Sector Police. The research focuses on the implementation of guidance in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2012, which emphasizes the active role of community officers in the diversion process. The research methodology used is a normative empirical approach, combining normative legal studies with empirical data from the field. The findings indicate that the guidance provided by community advisors at the Mandau Sector Police complies with the provisions of Law No. 11 of 2012. Community officers play an active role in guiding, supervising, and overseeing the juveniles throughout the diversion process and in implementing the agreements reached. Additionally, community advisors are responsible for reporting to the court if the diversion agreement is not executed. However, the study also identifies several challenges in the guidance provided by community advisors, including a lack of consensus or agreement between the parties, a shortage of human resources or social workers, and the absence of community figures in the diversion process due to time constraints and the remote location of homes. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve the quality of human resources, involve community figures, and provide adequate facilities to support more effective diversion implementation.
PENALARAN HAKIM TENTANG PENYERTAAN TINDAK PIDANA DALAM KASUS KORUPSI PENGADAAN VIDEOTRON Musa, M.; Susanti, Heni
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): ARBITRIO IUDICIS
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v15i1.529

Abstract

ABSTRAK Hakim menggunakan dua jenis ajaran penyertaan dalam melakukan penalaran perluasan pemidanaan. Ajaran pertama memperluas pemidanaan terhadap orang (strafausdehnungsgrund) yang menitikberatkan pertanggungjawaban seseorang terhadap tindak pidana penyertaan. Ajaran kedua memperluas pemidanaan terhadap perbuatan (tatbestandausdehnungsgrund) yang memandang suatu perbuatan sebagai delik dalam penyertaan. Ketentuan norma penyertaan dalam KUHP menjadi persoalan dalam penegakan hukum Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi karena menimbulkan diskrepansi hakim dalam menerapkan perluasan pemidanaan dari penyertaan tindak pidana. Penelitian ini mengkaji penalaran hakim terhadap ajaran penyertaan dalam memperluas pemidanaan pada putusan penyertaan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif atau hukum doktrinal karena menggunakan sumber data sekunder yaitu putusan pengadilan/studi kasus tindak pidana korupsi pengadaan videotron di Kementerian Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil Menengah. Data diverifikasi dengan wawancara terhadap hakim, jaksa, advokat, dan ahli hukum serta dengan melakukan diskusi kelompok terpumpun untuk mengetahui taraf sinkronisasi hukum dari putusan yang ada. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya dua variasi penalaran hakim terhadap ajaran penyertaan dalam menentukan perluasan pemidanaan pada putusan penyertaan tindak pidana korupsi. Putusan-putusan pengadilan dari hakim judex facti menentukan perluasan pemidanaan didasarkan pada pandangan perluasan pemidanaan terhadap perbuatan. Penyertaan dipandang sebagai persoalan perbuatan pelaku adalah tindak pidana yang harus dipertanggungjawabkan berupa pemidanaan. Putusan-putusan dari hakim judex juris memandang penyertaan tindak pidana sebagai persoalan pertanggungjawaban untuk memperluas dapat dipidananya seseorang. Putusan-putusan hakim judex facti telah menimbulkan disparitas pemidanaan terhadap peserta tindak pidana.Kata kunci: penalaran hakim; tindak pidana korupsi; penyertaan; perluasan pemidanaan.ABSTRACT Judges use two concepts of complicity in legal reasoning related to sentence expansion. The rst concept expands the punishment of a person (strafausdehnungsgrund), emphasizing a person’s responsibility for complicity. The second concept expands the punishment of an act (tatbestandausdehnungsgrund), viewing it as an offense in complicity. The provisions of the complicity norm in the Criminal Code are a problem in law enforcement of the Anti-Corruption Law because it creates judges’ discretion in implementing the expansion of sentences of complicity. This study discusses the judges’ reasoning on complicity regarding the expansion of sentences of complicity in a corruption case. This study is normative legal research or doctrinal law using secondary data sources, speci cally court decisions/case studies of corruption crime in videotron procurement at the Ministry of Cooperatives and Small-Medium Enterprises. The data were veri ed by interviewing judges, prosecutors, advocates, and legal experts and by conducting a focus group discussion to determine the level of legal synchronization of existing court decisions. The study exhibits two variations of judges’ legal reasoning in determining the expansion of sentences in the decisions on complicity in a corruption case. Judex facti judges’ decisions determine the extension of sentences adhering to the view of expanding punishment for acts. Complicity is perceived as the accomplices’ actions are criminal acts taking the same degree of guilt and punishment. Judex juris judges’ decisions view complicity as a matter of liability to expand a person’s conviction. The judex facti decisions create a disparity of sentences for the accomplices. Keywords: judges’ legal reasoning; corruption crime; complicity; sentence expansion.
Co-Authors ENDRI ENDRI Heni Susanti, Heni Kasmanto Rinaldi, Kasmanto Sonny Zulhuda Yut Sepin, Fitria