Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Economic: Journal Economic and Business
Setiawan, Lisno
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Optimization of Public Participation Space in the State Budget Preparation Cycle setiawan, lisno; masdi, Arief
Economic: Journal Economic and Business Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): ECONOMIC: Journal Economic and Business
Publisher : Lembaga Riset Mutiara Akbar (LARISMA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56495/ejeb.v1i1.221

Abstract

One of the arts in budgeting is finding a balance between ideal conditions and government decisions. Public participation is expected to be able to provide a solution to this dilemma. Public involvement in the preparation of the APBN in Indonesia is still relatively stagnant.. The constrain is that there is no mechanism for the public to channel feedback in the formulation of the Budget process. Therefore, this research is to identify a weak Indonesian OBI score and recommendation. By using qualitative methods, especially considering the institutions and business processes, the author formulates a mechanism in the framework of the Budget preparation cycle. The result of the study is that there are two mechanisms for public participation. The first mechanism is public participation in conjunction with the process of formulation of the APBN. It will fulfill the requirements of the OBI formalities, although it has limited time to accommodate follow-up actions. The second mechanism is public participation as a part of the performance budget and the policy evaluation process. It will start from the stipulation of the budget bill in the previous year until the beginning of the formulation of the Budget process. The benefit is the government easily accommodated the follow-up action in budget priorities. Both alternatives require regulatory improvements both in terms of business processes and institutions.
OPTIMALISASI PARTISIPASI PUBLIK DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN MELALUI CIVIC PARTICIPATION INDEX Widjaja, Gunawan; Martedjo, Wagiman; Setiawan, Lisno
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i2.1724

Abstract

Law Number 13 of 2022, which serves as the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011, strengthens public involvement and participation in all stages of the legislative process, from planning to enactment. However, according to the development of public participation as reflected in the Civic Participation Index from 2019 to 2024 published by the World Justice Project, Indonesia has experienced a downward trend. Several challenges to public participation include the lack of public awareness of their participatory rights, limited access to information, and the absence of effective mechanisms for gathering public input. This study employs a normative juridical method with a statute approach to analyze existing regulations and their implementation (best practices) in accordance with international standards, using a comparative study of countries with higher civic participation index levels. The data were collected from secondary sources, including primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. This study is of significant urgency as it can provide practical recommendations for the development of more effective technical guidelines on public participation as mandated by Law Number 13 of 2022.
MENILIK KEDUDUKAN PTUN SEBAGAI GARDA KEADILAN ADMINISTRATIF DALAM MENJAGA KUALITAS DEMOKRASI INDONESIA Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Khalimi; Setiawan, Lisno
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i2.1725

Abstract

The Administrative Court (PTUN) plays a crucial role as the last resort for justice seekers after exhausting avenues of Objection and Administrative Appeal, particularly in safeguarding the quality of democracy in Indonesia. As an institution that oversees state administrative actions, the PTUN has the authority to adjudicate disputes between citizens and the government. In recent years, the PTUN has issued various rulings that reinforce democratic principles such as freedom of expression and broader political access. This analysis employs a normative juridical method through literature review and case studies of PTUN decisions, aiming to identify and evaluate the PTUN’s contribution in administratively maintaining and supervising the quality of democracy in Indonesia. The research addresses the following issues: (a) How does the PTUN contribute to maintaining the quality of democracy in Indonesia? and (b) How does the PTUN ensure transparency and accountability in government? In conclusion, first, based on the analysis of several decisions, the PTUN plays a significant role and serves as a front-line guardian in maintaining and overseeing the quality of democracy in Indonesia through its rulings. Second, the PTUN has upheld judicial neutrality, the integrity of electoral processes, and has ensured transparency and accountability in the administration of government.
Co-Authors Gunawan Widjaja Khalimi Martedjo, Wagiman masdi, Arief Timbo Mangaranap Sirait