Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.244
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Collegium Studiosum Journal Jurnal DIALEKTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Tafaqquh : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dan Ahwal Syahsiyah
Khalimi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
Problematika Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Konteks Hukum Islam dan Solusinya Onytra Nirwana Prihatin; Khalimi; Muhammad Faozan
TAFAQQUH Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): Tafaqquh : Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dan Ahwal Syahsiyah
Publisher : STIS DAFA MATARAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70032/xyxfsm94

Abstract

This study aims to examine the phenomenon of interfaith marriages in Indonesia, focusing on diverse legal interpretations and solutions to the legal issues arising from the implementation of interfaith marriages within the context of Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage. The research employs a qualitative approach with document analysis as the primary method. Data are collected from legal literature, religious interpretations, and court rulings related to interfaith marriages. The data analysis technique involves an in-depth review of legal texts and the various interpretations from experts. The findings show significant differences in the interpretation of Article 2, paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 regarding the validity of marriages according to respective religious laws. Although the law does not explicitly prohibit or permit interfaith marriages, interpretations from several legal experts and court rulings reflect diverse viewpoints. Case examples, such as the Surabaya District Court Decision Number 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN Sby, which granted the application for an interfaith marriage, illustrate the inconsistency between religious and civil law. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities of interfaith marriage law in Indonesia. The research findings also offer legal solutions that can be considered in the formulation of more comprehensive and equitable legislation regarding interfaith marriages. Thus, it is hoped that there will be synergy between religious law and state law in addressing the issues of interfaith marriages and providing clear legal protection for couples who choose this path
ANALISIS DAMPAK FEEDBACK FREAMING MEDIA SOSIAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM BAGI NITIZEN DALAM KASUS VIRALNYA PEMKOT SURABAYA SIDAK PERUSAHAAN TAHAN IJAZAH KARYAWAN Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Khalimi; Sendias, Nungky
The Juris Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v9i1.1667

Abstract

The existence of media, both mass media and social media, has recently resulted in a very important role in influencing public opinion and is even considered as a media that will open all information that actually occurs in Indonesia and even in the world. There are many mass media and social media used as tools by political elites to influence public views on framing images for both personal and group image interests. Even the difference between the two is that social media has a more capable scope for the implementation of this function. Social media will play a greater role because with the existence of a container to accommodate freedom of opinion, netizens can freely provide feedback on their views as a reaction to the news that is rolling so that it increasingly shows the direction of various netizen reactions and increasingly emphasizes the direction of the reaction in the form of comments, uploads, reactions from other people's opinions and even influences real actions in the real world. Social media can shape our views on various issues that are rolling. One way that is often used by social media is by the way they "package" the news, which in simple terms is called "framing." Media framing can greatly influence the way we view an issue with the access that every social media user can obtain and can leave a trail of opinions written on the basis of freedom of speech.
ANALISIS PUTUSAN PTUN NO. 403/G/2024/PTUN.JKT: DISKREPANSI ANTARA LEGALITAS FORMAL DAN KEADILAN SUBSTANTIF Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Khalimi; Hatta, Ignatius Bambang Sukarno
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1625

Abstract

Semakin bertambahnya jumlah penduduk, tanah dari sudut ekonomi sangat berfungsi baik bagi masyarakat maupun negara sehingga seringkali terjadi sengketa atas tanah karena pejabat tata usaha negara memiliki kewenangan administratif sebagaimana dalam Putusan PTUN No. 403/G/2024/PTUN.JKT. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode Yuridis Normatif melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisa kasus, dengan rumusan masalah (1) Bagaimana bentuk diskrepansi antara legalitas formal dan keadilan substantif dalam Putusan PTUN No. 403/G/2024/PTUN.JKT?, (2) Bagaimana analisis teori hukum responsif menjelaskan ketidaksesuaian antara tindakan administratif dengan prinsip keadilan hukum?, dan disimpulkan bahwa, Pertama, bentuk diskrepansi antara legalitas formal dan keadilan substantif dalam Putusan PTUN No. 403/G/2024/PTUN.JKT, di mana suatu putusan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (inkracht) sehingga tidak dapat diganggu gugat secara hukum. Namun dalam praktiknya diabaikan, dan justru Putusan yang lain menjadi dasar administratif penerbitan sertifikat. Kedua, dalam hal dianalisis teori hukum responsif menjelaskan ketidaksesuaian antara tindakan administratif dengan prinsip keadilan hukum dalam perkara tersebut, ditemukan hal mana dalam penegakkan hukum administrasi di Indonesia konsep hukum responsif akan jauh lebih relevan untuk diterapkan.
VALIDITAS PEMBERHENTIAN DALAM JABATAN DIREKTUR RUMAH SAKIT UMUM DAERAH DR. H. JUSUF SK KALIMANTAN UTARA Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Khalimi; Sudrajat, Maman
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1626

Abstract

Aspek hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Samarinda Nomor 13/G/2023/PTUN.SMD akibat gugatan terhadap Gubernur Kalimantan Utara akibat terbitnya Keputusan Gubernur Kalimantan Utara Nomor 824/167/2-2-BKD tentang Pemberhentian Dr. Rustan Samsuddin dari jabatannya sebagai Direktur RSUD dr. H. Jusuf SK Kaltara pada tanggal 7 Maret 2023 sehingga menjadi objek sengketa KTUN. Gubernur Kalimantan Utara menerbitkan Keputusan tentang pemberhentian Dr. H. Rustan Samsuddin dari jabatannya sebagai Direktur RSUD dr. H. JUSUF SK Provinsi Kalimantan Utara dan dipindahtugaskan pada jabatan baru sebagai analis kesehatan pada Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Kalimantan Utara. Metode penelitian Yuridis Normatif digunakan dengan menganalisis putusan Gubernur Kalimantan Utara. Pencabutan Keputusan Gubernur Kalimantan Utara Nomor 824/167/2-2-BKD yang berisi pemberhentian dr. RS dari jabatan direktur Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah tanggal 7 Maret 2023 mengabulkan seluruh permohonan pemohon dalam membatalkan dan mengharuskan keputusan Gubernur tersebut dicabut dan mengembalikan jabatan penggugat sebagai Direktur Utama Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah dr. H. JUSUF SK Kalimantan Utara serta memulihkan harkat dan kehormatannya sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan keputusan tersebut dinyatakan batal demi hukum.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION ON CLASSIFICATION OF IMPORTED GOODS PARAQUAT DICHLORIDE FOR LEGAL CERTAINTY Enna Budiman; Timbo Mangaranap Sirait; Khalimi
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2025
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.422

Abstract

The classification dispute over the import of Paraquat Dichloride between an importing company and the Directorate General of Customs and Excise has become an important precedent in Indonesian State Administrative Law (TUN), particularly in the customs sector. The dispute arose due to different interpretations of tariff classification: the importer classified Paraquat 42% Technical as a raw chemical (HS 2933.39.30.00) with a 0% import duty rate, while Customs classified it as a ready-to-use herbicide (HS 3808.93.19.00) with a 5% rate. This dispute had significant implications for the fiscal obligations of both the company and the state, and highlighted regulatory uncertainty in the pesticide industry. This study aims to analyze the dispute resolution mechanism in that context, covering the appeal process at the Tax Court, Judicial Review at the Supreme Court, and the broader implications for legal certainty and administrative practices. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and a case study of court decisions. The analysis found and concluded: First, the administrative dispute resolution mechanism in customs classification follows a tiered process consisting of administrative objection, judicial appeal to the Tax Court, and judicial review (PK) to the Supreme Court. Second, in terms of legal reasoning, both the importer and DJBC presented arguments based on valid legal frameworks, but differed in interpreting the tariff classification, each supported by legally debatable claims. Third, the Tax Court and the Supreme Court assessed the case objectively using evidence such as laboratory analysis results, the Indonesian Customs Tariff Book (BTKI), and fundamental principles of administrative law. Fourth, the legal implications of the Supreme Court's ruling are highly significant for public administration, reinforcing the legal authority of DJBC and potentially serving as jurisprudence in the future.
LEGAL REVIEW OF PTUN DECISION NO. 87/G/2014/PTUN-JKT RELATED TO THE DISPUTE OVER THE DISMISSAL OF STUDENTS BY THE UNIVERSITY Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Khalimi; Naiborhu, Mesa Indra
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2025
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.428

Abstract

Agent of change is one of the roles given to students, but sometimes in the process they experience obstacles until they are finally dismissed by the Chancellor, so that the decision needs to be analyzed from the perspective of state administrative and constitutional law. The research was conducted using the Normative Juridical Method through literature study and case analysis of PTUN Decision No. 87/G/2014/PTUN-JKT. The problems discussed are: (1) whether the decision is a beschikking that can be used as an object of dispute at the PTUN, and (2) how the constitutional basis strengthens the jurisdiction of the PTUN in this case. The results of the study show, First, that the rector's action fulfills the elements of a State Administrative Decision (Beschikking) and is thus valid as an object of lawsuit. Second, the jurisdiction of the State Administrative Court in the dispute is strengthened not only from the juridical aspect, but also from the principle of due process of law, the values of Pancasila, and the guarantee of the right to education in the constitution, thus recommending the need for caution of university officials in making administrative decisions to remain in line with the principle of substantive justice.
THE ROLE OF PTUN IN ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OF THE PROTECTION OF CITIZENS' RIGHTS Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Khalimi; Widjaja, Liza
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2025
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.430

Abstract

In line with developments in science and sociology in society, there are currently many disputes related to state administrative law between state administrative agencies/officials and the community. This article will discuss decisions made by state administrative agencies or officials that are considered to have harmed the interests of the community in legal terms. The research method used is normative jurisprudence through literature study and case study. Primary data was obtained from official copies of decisions from the Supreme Court Decision Directory, while secondary data consisted of relevant administrative law literature and scientific articles. The research questions are: 1) What is the background of the administrative dispute between the State Administrative Body and the Business Entity in the Jakarta Administrative Court Decision No. 425/G/2024/PTUN/Jakarta? 2) What are the implications of this decision for future administrative practices in government (Ius Constituendum)? The findings and conclusions are as follows: First, the background of the administrative dispute in this case is related to an administrative decision (Beschikking) issued by the BKPM, which was deemed detrimental to the legal interests of PT. Global Akses Sinergi, according to the Indonesian legal system, as regulated by the Administrative Court. Second, this decision will contribute to the development of Indonesian administrative law toward the creation of better and more transparent law in the future (Ius Constituendum).
The Authority of Judicial Review on the Administrative Court Decision No. 234/G/2024/PTUN.JKT: A State Administrative Law Perspective Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap; Khalimi; Halim, Adriasnyah
Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 23 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Pengurus Pusat Perkumpulan Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara Indonesia (PIANI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Jakarta Administrative Court's decision declaring the lawsuit inadmissible due to the absence of a state administrative decision as the object of the dispute illustrates the narrow limits in interpreting the authority of administrative courts. Administrative law should provide protection for citizens' rights against administrative negligence, the lawsuit was rejected because it was deemed not to meet the formal elements in the PTUN procedural law. This study aims to determine how the PTUN's authority is in adjudicating lawsuits regarding state officials' negligence against citizens' constitutional rights, as in Decision Number 234/G/2024/PTUN.JKT and whether the Supreme Court can conduct a judicial review of the PTUN's decision that rejected the lawsuit because the object of the dispute was deemed not to meet the requirements of state administrative law. This research is normative juridical using secondary data. The results of this study indicate that the PTUN has the authority to adjudicate lawsuits regarding state officials' negligence if they relate to state administrative actions that harm citizens' administrative rights, although it often limits its authority formally. The Supreme Court can conduct a judicial review of the PTUN's decision that rejected the lawsuit because the object of the dispute did not meet the requirements of administrative law, by focusing on the legal aspects and the PTUN's authority, without re-evaluating the facts.
Co-Authors Enna Budiman Halim, Adriasnyah Hatta, Ignatius Bambang Sukarno Muhammad Faozan Naiborhu, Mesa Indra Onytra Nirwana Prihatin Sendias, Nungky Sudrajat, Maman Timbo Mangaranap Sirait Timbo Mangaranap Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap Widjaja, Liza