Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ilmu Hukum Prima jurnal hukum das sollen
Putra, Aldi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Eksistensi Jasa Joki Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa Perspektif Tanggun Jawab Hukum Putra, Aldi; Perdana, Albar
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Jockey services in higher education used by students are a form of ethical violation and are subject to sanctions. The legal umbrella of the prohibition of jockey services is regulated in Article 15 paragraph (2) of the Law on the National Education System, Article 18 to Article 20 of the Regulation of the Minister of Education, Culture Research and Technology on Quality Assurance of Higher Education, Article 72 of the Law on Copyright and several regulations made by universities. However, jockeying services are often equated with the term plagiarism, which, of course, has a different meaning, so law enforcement against the handling of jockeying services is still unclear. This research uses normative research. The nature of the research is descriptive qualitative. Data collection methods using literature study. Legal materials consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis used is a qualitative method. The need for law enforcement in final assignment jockey services is essential because every related legal product still terms jockey services, including plagiarism, which actually has a difference. In addition, universities certainly have strict regulations and oppose the act of cheating in the university environment. Regulations regarding jockey services in universities are the first milestone in regulating the use of jockey services.
EKSISTENSI HYBRID ARBITRATION DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF JOHN AUSTIN DAN HANS KELSEN Putra, Aldi
JURNAL HUKUM DAS SOLLEN Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Das Sollen
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indragiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32520/das-sollen.v10i2.3622

Abstract

Penelitian ini berfokus pada hadirnya hybrid arbitration terhadap hukum positif sesuai dengan yang dianut Indonesia yaitu hukum tertulis atau ius constitutum sehingga jelas dan mengikat. Hukum positif terhadap hybrid arbitration sama arbitrase biasa diatur di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Secara hukum positif, perspektif hukum positif ahli hukum John Austin dan Hans Kelsen pada hakikatnya pemberlakuakan putusan arbitrase dan hybrid arbitration sama dengan putusan litigasi namun masih adanya pihak yang tidak terima menerima putusan arbitrase tersebut menjadi sesuatu inkonstitusi. John Austin menyatakan penguasa memiliki jiwa yang bijaksana dan adil terhadap kebijakan yang dibuat dan Hans Kalsen menekankan bahwa hukum positif yang dianut yaitu teori hukum murni bahwa hukum sebagaimana adanya, melainkan bukan sebagaimana seharusnya ada. Jadi terdapat kontradiksi dari sifat eksekutorial yang seharusnya sesuai dengan produk hukum menjadi tolok ukur dalam membuat putusan arbitrase/hybrid arbitration. Kata kunci: Hukum Positif, Hybrid Arbitration, Penyelesaian Sengketa
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Eksistensi Jasa Joki Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa Perspektif Tanggun Jawab Hukum Putra, Aldi; Perdana, Albar
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Jockey services in higher education used by students are a form of ethical violation and are subject to sanctions. The legal umbrella of the prohibition of jockey services is regulated in Article 15 paragraph (2) of the Law on the National Education System, Article 18 to Article 20 of the Regulation of the Minister of Education, Culture Research and Technology on Quality Assurance of Higher Education, Article 72 of the Law on Copyright and several regulations made by universities. However, jockeying services are often equated with the term plagiarism, which, of course, has a different meaning, so law enforcement against the handling of jockeying services is still unclear. This research uses normative research. The nature of the research is descriptive qualitative. Data collection methods using literature study. Legal materials consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The analysis used is a qualitative method. The need for law enforcement in final assignment jockey services is essential because every related legal product still terms jockey services, including plagiarism, which actually has a difference. In addition, universities certainly have strict regulations and oppose the act of cheating in the university environment. Regulations regarding jockey services in universities are the first milestone in regulating the use of jockey services.
Co-Authors Perdana, Albar