Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE International Journal of Law and Society
Muslimin, JM.
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Actualization of Justice in the Settlement of Joint Assets Due to Divorce: Comparative Analysis of Decisions of the Religious Courts Muslimin, JM.; Fatma, Yulia
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 12, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v12i2.9064

Abstract

Abstract: The core problem examined in this paper is the practice of sharing assets in the Religious Courts. The article aims to prove that the justice provided by the judge in the distribution of joint assets is not only textually in accordance with applicable regulations, but by considering comprehensively, so that it can reflect the actuality. The urgency of this research is to emphasize that justice in the distribution of sharing assets cannot be interpreted as saying that each party must get an equal share. Justice can refer to the contributions made by both parties, both material and non-material. The used method of research focuses on a normative approach which is sharpened empirically. The normative approach requires a juridical and philosophical exploration, while empirical through the sociological approach. The results of the study conclude that the decisions of the Religious Courts regarding sharing assets are not always in accordance with the provisions of the Islamic Law Compilation (Kompilasi Hukum Islam).Keywords: justice; join assets; judges’ decision.Abstrak: Masalah utama yang dikaji dalam tulisan ini adalah praktik pembagian harta bersama di Peradilan Agama. Tulisan bertujuan untuk membuktikan bahwa keadilan yang diberikan oleh hakim dalam pembagian harta bersama tidak hanya semata tekstual sesuai aturan yang berlaku, akan tetapi dengan mempertimbangkan secara komprehensif, sehingga dapat mencerminkan sisi aktualitasnya. Urgensi penelitian ini untuk menegaskan bahwa keadilan dalam pembagian harta bersama, tidak bisa diartikan menjadi setiap pihak harus mendapatkan bagian yang sama rata. Keadilan dapat mengacu kepada kontribusi yang diberikan oleh kedua belah pihak, baik secara materi maupun non-materi. Sementara metode yang digunakan mentitikberatkan pada pendekatan normatif dan dipertajam dengan empiris. Pendekatan normatif meniscayakan uji putusan secara yuridis dan filosofis. Sedangkan empiris, melalui sisi sosiologis. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa putusan Peradilan Agama tentang harta bersama tidak selalu sesuai dengan ketentuan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI).Kata Kunci: keadilan; harta bersama; putusan hakim.
Sharia, Deradicalization and National Consensus: A Review of Pancasila-inspired Philosophy as a Socio-Legal Nexus for Indonesia and Afghanistan Muslimin, JM.; Rizapoor, Habiburrahman; Zamhari, Arif; Halid; Umar, Muhammad
International Journal of Law and Society Vol 3 No 2 (2024): International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)
Publisher : NAJAHA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59683/ijls.v3i2.93

Abstract

This article examines the concept of Pancasila and primordial deradicalization as a socio-legal nexus for Islamic and socio-anthropological practices in Indonesia and Afghanistan, focusing on fostering a plural society. Pancasila, the philosophical foundation of the Indonesian state, has accommodated religious and cultural diversity, including legal plurality. The article explores how the principles of Pancasila can contribute to the deradicalization of extreme primordial affiliation (such as sharia) by addressing the underlying socio-anthropological factors that contribute to extremism in both countries. The study employs a comparative analysis approach, drawing on qualitative data from various sources, including academic literature. It highlights the similarities and differences in the socio-anthropological contexts of Indonesia and Afghanistan, particularly about the dynamics of Islamic values, laws, and their impact on society. By examining the role of Pancasila and its potential applicability in Afghanistan, the article aims to contribute to developing effective primordial deradicalization strategies in both countries. The findings suggest that Pancasila's emphasis on inclusivity, tolerance, and mutual respect can provide a framework for addressing the socio-anthropological factors contributing to a socio-legal nexus. The article argues that by incorporating the principles of Pancasila into deradicalization efforts, policymakers and practitioners can work towards creating a more pluralistic and cohesive society. It also explores the challenges and opportunities of implementing such an approach, considering the unique contexts of Indonesia and Afghanistan.  
Co-Authors Arif Zamhari Fatma, Yulia Halid Muhammad Umar Rizapoor, Habiburrahman