Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Law Reconstruction International Journal Of Science, Technology & Management (IJSTM) ANDREW Law Journal
Danial Syah
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering Transportation Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
JURIDICAL REVIEW OF BUILDING RIGHTS EXTENSION ON MANAGEMENT RIGHTS Herlina Hanum Harahap; Danial Syah
International Journal of Law Reconstruction Vol 5, No 1 (2021): International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15580

Abstract

The term of Building Use Rights on Management Rights was initially for 50 years in accordance with the provisions of Article 35 of Act No. 5 of 1960 but with the existence of Article 29 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2014 to five 5 years. This clearly results in the issue of legal uncertainty for holders of Building Use Rights over Management Rights. The method used is normative juridical, the results of research obtained based on the analysis carried out can be seen that so far the arrangement for extension of Building Use Rights over Management Rights cannot be separated from the provisions of Article 35 of Act No. 5 of 1960, namely 30 years which can be extended with an approved for 20 years, with the provision of Article 29 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2014 on Management of State and/or Regional Property, it has clearly changed the length of time granting Building Use Rights over Management Rights, namely for five years which can be extended with government approval. The provisions of Article 29 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 2014 on Management of State and/or Regional Property have resulted in legal certainty issues and can harm the holders of Building Use Rights above management rights so that it is clear that the provisions including Verordnung & Autonome Satzung have contradicted the provisions.
Analysis of Libles Obscuur in Civil Suits in Medan State Court Danial Syah
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): January 2021
Publisher : Publisher Cv. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46729/ijstm.v2i1.110

Abstract

The research study about first to find out the reasons for the judge declaring a lawsuit unclear or obscure (obscuur libel) and second is to find out the consequences of an unclear or obscure lawsuit (obscuur libel). In this study using qualitative data analysis. The approach method in this research is to use a normative juridical approach, namely an approach that is carried out by collecting secondary data.The results of this study were (1) The reason the judge stated that a lawsuit was unclear or obscure (obscuur libel) were nine factors that caused the claim submitted by the plaintiff to be unacceptable. The nine factors are: (a) The identity of the parties (Plaintiff and Defendant). (b) The object of the lawsuit being litigated is unclear. (c) Petitum lawsuit exceeds the claim posita. (d) Power of attorney does not meet the requirements. (e) The lawsuit is filed by an underage / incapable person. (f) Claims are not filed on time. (g) Incomplete parties. (h) The court is not competent to hear the claim that is submitted. (i) The grounds of the plaintiff's rights are not clear. (2) As a result of a lawsuit is unclear or obscure (obscuur libel), then the person concerned does not accept such a decision, because the decision does not give satisfaction to what he wants from the claim as stated in the lawsuit. Because the verdict cannot be accepted in practice in the District Court based on the consideration that the plaintiff's claim is unacceptable, in fact it is a consideration regarding the subject matter of the case, namely whether the plaintiff is the owner or entitled to the suspect land, it is more appropriate to declare the claim rejected. Therefore, the plaintiff's unclear rights to the object of the lawsuit in dispute are not appropriate to be used as legal considerations to declare the claim unacceptable.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK MASYARAKAT ADAT DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM LINGKUNGAN DI INDONESIA Fenny Hernita Noor Sagala; Khairunnisa; Khoirotun Nisak Marpaung; Danial Syah
ANDREW Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : ANDREW Law Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61876/alj.v4i2.75

Abstract

Meskipun kerangka hukum lingkungan di Indonesia secara normatif telah menyediakan landasan kuat untuk perlindungan hak masyarakat adat atas lingkungan hidup, termasuk melalui UU No. 32 Tahun 2009 dan Putusan MK No. 35/PUU-X/2012, implementasi di lapangan (das sein) masih menunjukkan kesenjangan signifikan dengan ketentuan normatif (das sollen). Temuan utama mengindikasikan bahwa masyarakat adat tetap rentan terhadap degradasi lingkungan dan konflik agraria akibat lemahnya komitmen pemerintah daerah, tumpang tindih regulasi, minimnya partisipasi, serta penegakan hukum yang belum sepenuhnya berpihak pada keadilan ekologis. Keterbatasan penelitian ini terletak pada fokus utamanya pada analisis dokumen dan studi kasus yang terdokumentasi, sehingga mungkin belum sepenuhnya menangkap seluruh dinamika sosial-politik lokal yang memengaruhi perlindungan hak masyarakat adat. Oleh karena itu, penelitian selanjutnya disarankan untuk melakukan studi lapangan yang lebih mendalam dengan melibatkan wawancara langsung dengan masyarakat adat, aparat penegak hukum, dan pemangku kepentingan lainnya, serta melakukan analisis kuantitatif terhadap data konflik untuk memperkuat temuan empiris dan memberikan rekomendasi kebijakan yang lebih spesifik dan terukur. Hal ini akan membantu dalam merumuskan strategi perlindungan hukum yang lebih efektif, partisipatif, dan berkeadilan lingkungan di masa depan.
Co-Authors Fenny Hernita Noor Sagala Herlina Hanum Harahap Khairunnisa Khoirotun Nisak Marpaung