Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism
Sayyed Ahmad Fazeli
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Argumentasi Seputar Ineffability Sayyed Ahmad Fazeli; Muhammad Nur
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 1 No. 1 (2011): August
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dalam kesempatan ini, penulis akan mencoba menganalisis beberapa argumentasi tentang tidak dapat diungkapkannya pengalaman mistis. Dari satu periode ke periode, abad dan tradisi yang berbeda, para mistikus atau sui (‘ârif) telah mengemukakan hal yang sama, yaitu kualitas tak terekspresikan atau tidak dapat diungkapkannya (ineffability) pengalaman penyaksian atau visi mistis (syuhûd). Teori ini pertamakali dikemukakan oleh William James. Kajian dan analisis atas argumentasi-argumentasi tersebut akan penulis mulai dengan terlebih dahulu membincangkan bagaimana James menganalisis gagasan tentang kualitas tidak terlukiskannya (ineffability) pengalaman mistis.
THE SYSTEM OF DIVINE MANIFESTATION IN THE IBN ‘ARABIAN SCHOOL OF THOUGHT Sayyed Ahmad Fazeli; Shiraz Agha
Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 1 No. 2 (2011): December
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Islam (STFI) Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

One of the fundamental problems of Theoretical Mysticism is the explanation of the world as being something other than God after having accepted the Unity of Existence. This paper seeks to present, after having explained certain necessary premises, the theory of manifestation as one that can explain and analyze multiplicity.In this article we especially seek to solidify the relation of such claims to mystics in general and to the adherents of the Ibn ‘Arabian school of thought in particular. This is especially important because in some of the works of many specialists in this fi eld we fi nd that some unrealistic claims have been defi nitively attributed in to the Great Sheikh. The only way to counteract such false claims, in any field, including Theoretical Mysticism, is to make it binding upon ourselves to delve into the views of others in a cautious way. We must take the apparent meanings of the sayings of the mystics as a proof in this matter. Therefore the method of research of the writer of this article is to relate the sayings of the Great Sheikh and his commentators while commentating upon and analyzing them as well.
Co-Authors Muhammad Nur Shiraz Agha