Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PELAKSANAAN ASAS HUKUM RETROAKTIF TERHADAP PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA MATRILL Asmara Triputra, Yuli; Hasyim, Rohman
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 28 No. 1 (2022): Maret
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v28i1.64

Abstract

Abstrak Persoalan retroaktif sendiri muncul sebagai konsekuensi diterapkannya asas legalitas. Asas legalitas sendiri dapat dikaji berdasarkan berbagai aspek, seperti aspek historis, aspek sosio kriminologis, aspek pembaharuan hukum dalam kaitannya dengan pandangan secara imperatif dan linier, aspek yang terkait dengan politik kriminal serta kajian dari perspektif weltanschaung kita yaitu Pancasila, kajian dari masing-masing aspek ini memberi implikasi yang berbeda mengenai asas legalitas yang mana dalam pandangan ilmu pengetahuan perbedaan itu justru akan memperkaya khasanah ilmu hukum pidana itu sendiri, Larangan pemberlakuan surut suatu peraturan pidana (retroaktif) yang tercantum dalam Pasal 28 I ayat (1) UUD 1945 Amandemen Kedua menimbulkan implikasi peraturan di bawah UUD 1945 tidak dapat mengeyampingkan asas tersebut. Pemberlakuan Asas Retroaktif hanya berkaitan dengan hukum pidana materiil. Dari kalimat “nullum delictum” yang artinya “tidak ada delik” dan “nulla poena” yang artinya “tidak ada pidana” menunjukan bahwa hal tersebut merupakan ranah hukum pidana materiil. Pemberlakuan Asas Retroaktif tidak dapat diberlakukan dalam hukum pidana formil secara umum yakni KUHAP, namun Asas Retroaktif dapat diberlakukan dalam hukum pidana formil secara khusus yakni dalam Undang-Undang KPK. Kata Kunci : Asas Legalitas, Asas Retroaktif, Penegakan Hukum Abstract Retroactive problems arise as a consequence of the application of the principle of legality. The principle of legality itself can be studied based on various aspects, such as historical aspects, socio-criminological aspects, aspects of legal reform in relation to imperative and linear views, aspects related to criminal politics and studies from our Weltanschaung perspective, namely Pancasila, a study of each aspect This gives different implications regarding the principle of legality which in the view of science the difference will actually enrich the repertoire of criminal law itself. The prohibition of retroactive application of a criminal regulation contained in Article 28 I paragraph (1) of the Second Amendment of the 1945 Constitution raises the implications of regulations under the 1945 Constitution cannot override this principle. The application of the Retroactive Principle is only related to material criminal law. From the sentences "nullum delictum" which means "no offense" and "nulla poena" which means "no crime" shows that this is the realm of material criminal law. The application of the Retroactive Principle cannot be applied to formal criminal law in general, namely the Criminal Procedure Code, but the Retroactive Principle can be applied to formal criminal law specifically, namely the KPK Law.
Teori Pemidanaan Diferensiasi (Special Treatment Theory) Untuk Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum, Antara Balas Dendam Dan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia Kesuma, Derry Angling; Hasyim, Rohman; Cayo, Putri Sari Nilam
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 31 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of the concept of punishment for children in conflict with the law in Indonesia through the Juvenile Criminal Justice System must prioritise a restorative justice approach, namely the settlement of criminal cases by involving the perpetrator, victim, families of the perpetrator/victim, and other related parties to jointly seek a fair settlement with an emphasis on restoration to the original situation, rather than retribution, including: criminal investigation and prosecution of children in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, unless otherwise specified in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law; juvenile trials by courts within the general court system; and guidance, supervision, and/or assistance during the criminal process or measures and after serving the sentence or measures. If diversion does not result in an agreement or the agreement cannot be implemented because one of the parties does not agree to its implementation, the juvenile justice process will proceed to juvenile criminal proceedings. In addition, every child in the criminal justice process has the right, among other things, to be free from torture, cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment or punishment; not to be sentenced to death or life imprisonment; not to be arrested, detained or imprisoned, except as a last resort and for the shortest possible time; or to obtain justice before a juvenile court that is objective, impartial and closed to the public.