Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin JURNAL AL-AQIDAH
Idris, Mhd
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Filsafat Perenial dan Dialog Agama: Studi Pemikiran Seyyed Hossein Nasr Wahyuni, Dwi; Fauzi Harlis Yurnalis, Syukri Al; Idris, Mhd
JURNAL AL-AQIDAH Vol 13, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (759.932 KB) | DOI: 10.15548/ja.v13i1.2811

Abstract

Social conflict as something that no longer only stems from the issue of economic inequality and political interests. However, differences in conceptions between religions and religious prejudice against other religious communities are the causes of social conflicts. The important thing that urgently needs to be done is to create and expand religious dialogue. However, the religious dialogue that has been initiated and practiced over the last few decades still needs to be taken more seriously. This study aims to complete a literature review related to how perennial philosophy can be an alternative approach to a more serious religious dialogue. This study focuses on the thoughts of Seyyed Hossein Nasr several of his works that are relevant to discussions related to perennial philosophy and religious dialogue. The research method was carried out by collecting data using library research techniques. After the data has been collected, then data analysis is carried out using historical descriptive methods. The results of this study indicate that Seyyed Hossein Nasr's perennial philosophy offers an attitude that allows religious dialogue to be more serious and fruitful. With Seyyed Hossein Nasr's perennial philosophy, dialogue is carried out with clear integrity and genuine openness for mutual understanding to take place. Integrity and openness to dialogue with existing differences contribute to understanding differences in conceptions and breaking down prejudices between religious believers.
Redefinition Of The Nasakh In The Modern Era (Study Of Zahrah Al-Tafâsîr By Abu Zahrah) Idris, Mhd
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jiiu.v22i2.11031

Abstract

The discourse on the concept of nâsikh mansûkh is still controversial and still hot to talk about. This has become a prolonged polemic among scholars until now. The majority of scholars think that there are mansukh verses in the Qur'an. However, some scholars reject the textual concept of verses in the Qur'an. Among them is Abu Zahrah who emphasized that there is not a single verse in the Al-Qur'an that is transcribed. Therefore this research aims to find out Abu Zahrah's views and methods in understanding verses that are considered mansûkh by the majority of scholars and how it is applied in interpreting these verses in Zahrah al-Tafâsîr's book of Tafsir. This research is library research. The primary source of this research is the book Zahrah al-Tafâsîr by Abu Zahrah and related studies as secondary sources. The approach used in this research is the science of interpretation approach and the character study approach. Meanwhile, to process and analyze the data in this study, the content analysis method was used. The results of this study indicate that Abu Zahrah is one of the modern scholars who deny the existence of texts on verses of the Qur'an. The method used to complete the verses that appear contradictory is the al-taufiq (compromising) method. One of the forms among the texts that appear to be contradictory outwardly applies specifically, while the other applies in general so that the special one is the general one. The second form is interpreting one of the texts when meeting other arguments that support its interpretation. This is evidenced in interpreting the verses considered mansukhby the majority of scholars.
Co-Authors Dwi Wahyuni Fauzi Harlis Yurnalis, Syukri Al