Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

HARMONISASI HUKUM PENGATURAN DESA OLEH KEMENTERIAN DALAM NEGERI DAN KEMENTERIAN DESA, PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH TERTINGGAL, DAN TRANSMIGRASI PASCA BERLAKUNYA UNDANG UNDANG NO. 6 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG DESA Rooza Meilia Anggraini
Legal Spirit Vol 1, No 2 (2017): Legal Spirit
Publisher : Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Widyagama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (303.492 KB) | DOI: 10.31328/ls.v1i2.590

Abstract

After the Presidential Decree No. 165 year of 2014 on the Tasks Arrangement and Functions of the Working Cabinet was issued, there is a trade-off in the authority of the rural areas management between the Ministry of Domestic Affairs and the Ministry of Village, Underdeveloped Regions, and Transmigration. There was disharmony between the the Minister of Domestic Affairs and of Village, Underdeveloped Regions and Transmigration in terms of the governance arrangement of the authority of the village government and of any financial collection and the arrangement of the village fund. There have been four Legal efforts made to harmonize the two ministries: horizontal harmony, joint decision letters, repeal or cancelation by the related institutions or the institutions above them and executive or judicative reviews. Executive review is the testing rights adherent to the executive institution to test any legislation and to cancel it if it seems to be in contradiction with the higher legislation of with public interest. Judicative review is the testing of a legislation under the law by the Supreme Court. Keyword : Harmonization, Ministry of Domestic Affairs, Ministry of Village, Underdeveloped Regions, and Transmigration
Implementasi Pemilihan Kepala Desa Di Kampung Idiot Desa Sidoharjo Kecamatan Jambon Kabupaten Ponorogo (Ditinjau Berdasarkan Uu No. 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilu Dan Fikih Siyasah) Rooza Meilia Anggraini
At-Tasyri': Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 1 No. 01 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syari'ah Institut Agama Islam Riyadlatul Mujahidin Ngabar (IAIRM) Ponorogo.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55380/tasyri.v1i01.19

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to determine how the implementation of village head elections based on the review of Law no. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections and is also reviewed based on the rules in siyasa fiqh. Implementation of Pilkades in Sidoharjo Village is carried out like other villages in Ponorogo Regency, but in the initial stages of the implementation of pilkades, namely at the stage of determining the Voter List There are still some villagers who are seventeen years old who should have the right to vote, not registered in the Register Permanent Voters for the reason concerned are persons with disabilities who are very old and very unlikely that they will use their voting rights. Based on Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections, this is not in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, because all Indonesian citizens who are seventeen years old or are married then they already have the right to vote in the General Election. However, in fiqh siyasah, this is appropriate because people with disabilities are considered incapable of the law to act on any matter. The Pilkades Election Committee's policy should give equal rights to all Villagers who have special needs or not to have the right to vote in the General Election.Keywords: Village Head Election, Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. Keywords: Village Head Election, Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections, fiqh siyasah. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pelaksanaan pemilihan Kepala Desa berdasarkan tinjauan UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu dan juga ditinjau berdasarkan kaidah-kaidah dalam fikih siyasah. Pelaksanaan Pilkades di Desa Sidoharjo dilaksanakan seperti halnya desa-desa lain di Kabupaten Ponorogo, namun pada tahap awal pelaksanaan pilkades, yaitu pada tahap penetapan Daftar Pemilih Tetap ada beberapa warga desa yang sudah berusia tujuh belas tahun yang seharusnya memiliki hak pilih, tidak terdaftar kedalam Daftar Pemilih Tetap dengan alasan yang bersangkutan adalah warga disabilitas yang sudah sangat tua dan sangat kecil kemungkinan dia akan menggunakan hak pilihnya. Berdasarkan UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu, hal tersebut tidak sesuai dengan peraturan per undang-undangan yang berlaku, karena semua WNI yg sudah berusia tujuh belas tahun atau sudah menikah maka ia sudah memiliki hak pilih dalam Pemilu. Namun dalam fikih siyasah, hal tersebut sudah sesuai karena warga disabilitas dianggap tidak cakap hukum untuk bertindak atas suatu hal. Kebijakan Panitia Pemilihan Pilkades hendaknya memberikan hak yang sama terhadap seluruh Penduduk Desa baik yang berkebutuhan khusus atau tidak untuk memiliki hak memilih dalam Pemilu. Kata Kunci: Pemilihan Kepala Desa, UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu, fikih siyasah.
Kedudukan Keteapan MPR Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi Rooza Meilia Anggraini
At-Tasyri': Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 1 No. 02 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syari'ah Institut Agama Islam Riyadlatul Mujahidin Ngabar (IAIRM) Ponorogo.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55380/tasyri.v1i02.50

Abstract

Abstract After the amendment of UUD 1945, MPR is no longerthe highest state institution in Indonesia. This change had an effect on the function of the MPR. MPR just like a joint forum between the DPR and DPD. Amendments of UUD 1945 produce Institutions in horizontal functional relations, not in vertical structural relationships. This certainly has an impact on the legal products issued by the MPR, namely the TAP MPR. Then the legal products that can be outlined in the TAP MPR are only determination (beschikking), for example the determination of someone elected to be President and/or Vice President. Therefore the MPR regulation which is regulating as in the past will nolonger exist. But on the other hand the re-inclusion of the TAP MPR in the hierarchy of laws will lead to new problems, how to purpose judisial review ofTAP MPR if it contradicts with the UUD 1945, while the authority of the Constitutional Court is limited to testing the Law to the Constitution. And till nowthere are not specific provisions to solve that. One way that can be doing is through legislative review conducted by that institution. Abstrak Pasca diamandemennya Undang Undang Dasar Tahun 1945, MPR tidak lagi menjadi lembaga tertinggi Negara. Perubahan ini membawa akibat pada fungsi MPR yang menjadi sebuah forum gabungan join session antara DPR dan DPD. Amandemen UUD 1945 menghasilkan Lembaga Negara dalam hubungan funsional yang horizontal, bukan dalam hubungan structural vertical. Hal ini tentu berdampak kepada produk hukum yang dikeluarkan oleh MPR, yakni Ketetapan MPR. Maka produk hukum yang dapat dituangkan dalam ketetapan MPR hanyan keputusan yang bersifat penetapan (beschikking) saja misalnya penetapan seseorang terpilih menjadi Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden. Dengan demikian Ketetapan MPR yang bersifat mengatur (regiling) seperti di masa lalu tidak aka ada lagi. Namun disisi lain kembali dimasukkannya TAP MPR dalam hirarki peraturan perundang undangan akan menimbulkan permasalahan baru, yakni bagaimana melakukan pengujian materi terhadap TAP MPR jika bertentangan dengan UUD 1945, sedangkan wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi hanya terbatas sampai pada pengujian Undang Undang terhadap UUD. Dan sampai saat ini belum ada ketentuan khusus baik di tingkat UUD maupun Undang Undang lainnya yang menerangkan tentang pengujian materi terhadap TAP MPR. Salah satu cara yang dapat dilakukan yaitu melalui legislative review yang dilakukan lembaga itu sendiri dengan cara dibatalkan atau diubah melalui TAP MPR juga.