Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Transformation of Mandalika Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara
M. Oky F. Gafari
Unknown Affiliation
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Automotive Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Polemik Pernyataan Alumni LPDP “Cukup Saya WNI” Dalam Perspektif Media Dan Kajian Tindak Tutur Bahasa Bertiana Putri Saragih; Aulia Syahfitri Harahap; Devi Enjelina Nainggolan; Elisabeth Siska Limbong; Natal Fransiska Manalu; M. Oky F. Gafari; Herning Puspitarini
Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Vol. 3 No. 01 (2026): Februari - Maret 2026
Publisher : PT. Intelek Cendikiawan Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Polemik mengenai pernyataan seorang alumni Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP) yang menyatakan kebanggaannya karena anaknya menjadi warga negara asing memicu perdebatan luas di masyarakat dan media massa. Pernyataan yang berbunyi “cukup saya saja yang WNI, anak-anak jangan” menjadi viral dan memunculkan berbagai respons yang berkaitan dengan isu nasionalisme, tanggung jawab penerima beasiswa negara, serta etika dalam menyampaikan pendapat di ruang publik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis polemik tersebut melalui perspektif pemberitaan media serta mengkaji penggunaan bahasa dalam pernyataan tersebut menggunakan pendekatan pragmatik, khususnya teori tindak tutur. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan sumber data berupa pemberitaan dari beberapa media daring nasional seperti Detik, BBC Indonesia, CNBC Indonesia, dan laman Universitas Gadjah Mada. Analisis dilakukan dengan mengidentifikasi bentuk tindak tutur lokusi, ilokusi, dan perlokusi dalam pernyataan yang menjadi sumber kontroversi. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa secara lokusioner pernyataan tersebut hanya menyampaikan informasi mengenai status kewarganegaraan anak, namun secara ilokusioner mengandung ekspresi sikap yang dapat ditafsirkan sebagai kritik atau ketidakpuasan terhadap kondisi tertentu. Sementara itu, secara perlokusioner pernyataan tersebut menimbulkan dampak sosial yang luas berupa kritik publik, perdebatan di media sosial, hingga respons dari pemerintah terkait evaluasi pengelolaan beasiswa dan kewajiban pengabdian penerima LPDP. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa bahasa yang digunakan dalam ruang publik, khususnya di media sosial, memiliki potensi besar dalam mempengaruhi opini publik serta membentuk wacana sosial dan politik di masyarakat
Interpretasi Pragmatik Kontroversi Kakek Penjual Es Gabus dalam Wacana Digital Ridho Sastro Panjaitan; Grace Evelyn Hutabarat; Tabita Tesalonika Simaremare; Mutiara Aprilia; Mannawa Salwa; Herning Puspitarini; M. Oky F. Gafari
Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan  Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April: Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Asosiasi Periset Bahasa Sastra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/pragmatik.v4i2.2615

Abstract

This study analyzes pragmatic phenomena in digital communication, particularly those related to speech acts and their impact on public perception in the controversial case of an ice cube seller accused without clear basis by the authorities. This study applies a qualitative approach with a pragmatic analysis method based on discourse analysis. Data sources were obtained from online media news, social media posts, and official statements circulating in the digital public space. The analysis techniques used include identifying types of speech acts, interpreting implied meanings based on context, and analyzing public responses. The results show that statements from the authorities contain implications that trigger negative views even though they are not supported by strong evidence. This results in perlocutionary effects in the form of social stigma, reputational damage, and psychological stress for the victim. Conversely, the victim's communication strategies, which include being polite, defensive, and informative, can build a positive image and attract public sympathy. Furthermore, social media plays a crucial role in accelerating the spread of meaning and strengthening the construction of opinions through mass support and criticism. This research makes a significant contribution to enriching the study of pragmatics in the context of digital communication and emphasizes the importance of language ethics, media literacy, and pragmatic awareness in creating responsible public communication.
Representasi tindak tutur netizen dalam kasus mahasiswa UIN sultan syarif kasim riau di media sosial: perspektif pragmatik austin Jail keni Aguselin Sembiring; Berlian Serevina Harianja; Jufrikhan Manca Nurrin; Sri Lestari Putri Mulyani Harahap; Sherli Ramadhani; M. Oky f. Gafari; Herning Puspitarini
Journal Transformation of Mandalika, e-ISSN: 2745-5882, p-ISSN: 2962-2956 Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): April
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jtm.v7i4.6308

Abstract

This study aims to examine the types of speech acts found in netizen comments on the social media platform TikTok related to the Fara and Reyhan case. The virality of the case illustrates that social media functions not only as a medium for disseminating information but also as a platform for shaping public opinion through language. This study used a qualitative approach with descriptive methods and adopted J.L. Austin's speech act theory, which encompasses locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts. The data analyzed consisted of netizen comments collected from TikTok videos discussing the case. The research findings indicate that locutionary speech acts play a role in conveying information or opinions explicitly without hidden meanings. Illocutionary speech acts are used to express specific intentions, such as providing support, criticism, suggestions, and demonstrating partisanship. Meanwhile, perlocutionary speech acts demonstrate the impact or effect felt by the reader, such as the emergence of sympathy, fear, or a specific evaluation. Overall, the results of this study confirm that netizen comments on social media play a significant role in shaping public views of an event. Therefore, it is important to raise awareness of language use and digital literacy so that communication on social media can be more tactful and constructive
Co-Authors Aulia Syahfitri Harahap Berlian Serevina Harianja Bertiana Putri Saragih Devi Enjelina Nainggolan Elisabeth Siska Limbong Grace Evelyn Hutabarat Herning Puspitarini Jail keni Aguselin Sembiring Jufrikhan Manca Nurrin Mannawa Salwa Mutiara Aprilia Natal Fransiska Manalu Ridho Sastro Panjaitan Sherli Ramadhani Sri Lestari Putri Mulyani Harahap Tabita Tesalonika Simaremare