Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Transformation of Mandalika Jurnal Bastra (Bahasa dan Sastra) Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara
Herning Puspitarini
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Polemik Pernyataan Alumni LPDP “Cukup Saya WNI” Dalam Perspektif Media Dan Kajian Tindak Tutur Bahasa Bertiana Putri Saragih; Aulia Syahfitri Harahap; Devi Enjelina Nainggolan; Elisabeth Siska Limbong; Natal Fransiska Manalu; M. Oky F. Gafari; Herning Puspitarini
Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Vol. 3 No. 01 (2026): Februari - Maret 2026
Publisher : PT. Intelek Cendikiawan Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Polemik mengenai pernyataan seorang alumni Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP) yang menyatakan kebanggaannya karena anaknya menjadi warga negara asing memicu perdebatan luas di masyarakat dan media massa. Pernyataan yang berbunyi “cukup saya saja yang WNI, anak-anak jangan” menjadi viral dan memunculkan berbagai respons yang berkaitan dengan isu nasionalisme, tanggung jawab penerima beasiswa negara, serta etika dalam menyampaikan pendapat di ruang publik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis polemik tersebut melalui perspektif pemberitaan media serta mengkaji penggunaan bahasa dalam pernyataan tersebut menggunakan pendekatan pragmatik, khususnya teori tindak tutur. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan sumber data berupa pemberitaan dari beberapa media daring nasional seperti Detik, BBC Indonesia, CNBC Indonesia, dan laman Universitas Gadjah Mada. Analisis dilakukan dengan mengidentifikasi bentuk tindak tutur lokusi, ilokusi, dan perlokusi dalam pernyataan yang menjadi sumber kontroversi. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa secara lokusioner pernyataan tersebut hanya menyampaikan informasi mengenai status kewarganegaraan anak, namun secara ilokusioner mengandung ekspresi sikap yang dapat ditafsirkan sebagai kritik atau ketidakpuasan terhadap kondisi tertentu. Sementara itu, secara perlokusioner pernyataan tersebut menimbulkan dampak sosial yang luas berupa kritik publik, perdebatan di media sosial, hingga respons dari pemerintah terkait evaluasi pengelolaan beasiswa dan kewajiban pengabdian penerima LPDP. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa bahasa yang digunakan dalam ruang publik, khususnya di media sosial, memiliki potensi besar dalam mempengaruhi opini publik serta membentuk wacana sosial dan politik di masyarakat
Analisis Tindak Tutur Netizen Indonesia Terhadap Fenomena Monyet Punch di TikTok: Lokusi, Ilokusi, Perlokusi Ines Amelia; Nur Syakila; Poppy Adelia Adisty; Tessalonika Simangunsong; Lolo Mesliana Cibro; Aulia Uswatun Siagian; Herning Puspitarini
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK (JMIA)  April 2026
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v3i2.9367

Abstract

Using pragmatics, this study aims to describe the speech acts of Indonesian netizens regarding the Punch monkey phenomenon on TikTok. The focus of the study is to find locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary speech acts in netizen comments on TikTok. This study is a qualitative study using a descriptive approach. Data collection techniques were carried out through observation and documentation of comments on videos related to the phenomenon. The research data consisted of three comments that were purposively selected as analysis samples. Each comment was analyzed based on three dimensions of speech acts, namely locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary as the effects they have on the reader. The results show that the three comments analyzed simultaneously contain locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary elements. Comments in the locutionary aspect convey direct information about Punch's condition, while comments in the illocutionary aspect contain the intention of expressing sympathy, criticism, and support. Meanwhile, comments create emotional effects, such as empathy and concern for Punch's condition, in the perlocutionary aspect. These findings indicate that a single comment on social media can have a complex and layered communicative role. Therefore, the language used in social media comments not only serves to convey information, but also to express attitudes and influence readers.
Interpretasi Pragmatik Kontroversi Kakek Penjual Es Gabus dalam Wacana Digital Ridho Sastro Panjaitan; Grace Evelyn Hutabarat; Tabita Tesalonika Simaremare; Mutiara Aprilia; Mannawa Salwa; Herning Puspitarini; M. Oky F. Gafari
Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan  Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April: Pragmatik : Jurnal Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Asosiasi Periset Bahasa Sastra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/pragmatik.v4i2.2615

Abstract

This study analyzes pragmatic phenomena in digital communication, particularly those related to speech acts and their impact on public perception in the controversial case of an ice cube seller accused without clear basis by the authorities. This study applies a qualitative approach with a pragmatic analysis method based on discourse analysis. Data sources were obtained from online media news, social media posts, and official statements circulating in the digital public space. The analysis techniques used include identifying types of speech acts, interpreting implied meanings based on context, and analyzing public responses. The results show that statements from the authorities contain implications that trigger negative views even though they are not supported by strong evidence. This results in perlocutionary effects in the form of social stigma, reputational damage, and psychological stress for the victim. Conversely, the victim's communication strategies, which include being polite, defensive, and informative, can build a positive image and attract public sympathy. Furthermore, social media plays a crucial role in accelerating the spread of meaning and strengthening the construction of opinions through mass support and criticism. This research makes a significant contribution to enriching the study of pragmatics in the context of digital communication and emphasizes the importance of language ethics, media literacy, and pragmatic awareness in creating responsible public communication.
Representasi tindak tutur netizen dalam kasus mahasiswa UIN sultan syarif kasim riau di media sosial: perspektif pragmatik austin Jail keni Aguselin Sembiring; Berlian Serevina Harianja; Jufrikhan Manca Nurrin; Sri Lestari Putri Mulyani Harahap; Sherli Ramadhani; M. Oky f. Gafari; Herning Puspitarini
Journal Transformation of Mandalika, e-ISSN: 2745-5882, p-ISSN: 2962-2956 Vol. 7 No. 4 (2026): April
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/jtm.v7i4.6308

Abstract

This study aims to examine the types of speech acts found in netizen comments on the social media platform TikTok related to the Fara and Reyhan case. The virality of the case illustrates that social media functions not only as a medium for disseminating information but also as a platform for shaping public opinion through language. This study used a qualitative approach with descriptive methods and adopted J.L. Austin's speech act theory, which encompasses locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts. The data analyzed consisted of netizen comments collected from TikTok videos discussing the case. The research findings indicate that locutionary speech acts play a role in conveying information or opinions explicitly without hidden meanings. Illocutionary speech acts are used to express specific intentions, such as providing support, criticism, suggestions, and demonstrating partisanship. Meanwhile, perlocutionary speech acts demonstrate the impact or effect felt by the reader, such as the emergence of sympathy, fear, or a specific evaluation. Overall, the results of this study confirm that netizen comments on social media play a significant role in shaping public views of an event. Therefore, it is important to raise awareness of language use and digital literacy so that communication on social media can be more tactful and constructive
ANALISIS TINDAK TUTUR DALAM KONFLIK DIGITAL SEABLINGS DAN KNETZ: KAJIAN PRAGMATIK BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF AUSTIN Desi Sanjung Ayu Harepa; Andini Aulia; Kristiani Purba; Cindy Adelia; Santa Ulina; Sahputra Sihombing; M OKY Fardian Gafari; Herning Puspitarini
Jurnal Bastra (Bahasa dan Sastra) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL BASTRA EDISI APRIL 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, FKIP, Universitas Halu Oleo Kampus Bumi Tridharma Andounohu Kendari, Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara – Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36709/bastra.v11i2.2617

Abstract

Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif yang berfokus pada teori pragmatik, khususnya teori tindak tutur, untuk menyelidiki bentuk dan fungsi sindiran linguistik dalam interaksi digital pada konflik antara SEAblings dan K-Netz di platform X. Data dikumpulkan dari komentar pengguna yang mengandung sindiran, penghinaan, dan parodi bahasa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ujaran dalam konflik digital didominasi oleh tindak tutur ilokusi evaluatif dan konfrontatif. Sindiran linguistik dan parodi bahasa digunakan sebagai cara tidak langsung untuk menyampaikan ejekan, sementara ujaran rasis dianggap sebagai bentuk penghinaan yang memanfaatkan perbedaan budaya. Dari perspektif perlokusi, sebagian besar audiens menanggapi dengan humor dan solidaritas, sehingga tanggapan yang muncul tidak selalu sesuai dengan apa yang dimaksudkan oleh pembicara. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa konteks dan interpretasi pengguna sangat memengaruhi makna ujaran dalam komunikasi digital. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa bahasa media sosial tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai alat komunikasi tetapi juga berfungsi untuk membangun identitas, konflik, dan dinamika sosial.
Co-Authors Andini Aulia Aulia Syahfitri Harahap Aulia Uswatun Siagian Berlian Serevina Harianja Bertiana Putri Saragih Cindy Adelia Desi Sanjung Ayu Harepa Devi Enjelina Nainggolan Elisabeth Siska Limbong Grace Evelyn Hutabarat Ines Amelia Jail keni Aguselin Sembiring Jufrikhan Manca Nurrin Kristiani Purba Lolo Mesliana Cibro M Oky Fardian Gafari M. Oky F. Gafari Mannawa Salwa Mutiara Aprilia Natal Fransiska Manalu Nur Syakila Poppy Adelia Adisty Ridho Sastro Panjaitan Sahputra Sihombing Santa Ulina Sherli Ramadhani Sri Lestari Putri Mulyani Harahap Tabita Tesalonika Simaremare Tessalonika Simangunsong