Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IBLAM Law Review International Journal of Law, Policy and Governance
Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Challenges And Obstacles To The Application Of Restorative Justice On The Criminal Justice System In Indonesia Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan; ., Sunarko
International Journal of Law Policy and Governance Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Peneliti Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54099/ijlpg.v2i1.203

Abstract

The practice of enforcing the law of restorative justice, as an out-of-court settlement mechanism based on the principle of justice, has also been reflected in several court decisions. Challenges and obstacles to the application of restorative justice in the criminal justice system in Indonesia are the settlement of cases in the spirit of restorative justice, must be the ability to find a fair and mutually beneficial solution ( win-win solution ) for both parties, both victims and perpetrators. The admission of guilt of the perpetrator of a crime is a prerequisite for restorative justice. Based on these challenges and obstacles, it is necessary to regulate the laws and regulations governing the implementation of restorative justice, the existence of an element of confession of guilt from the perpetrators of the crime as a prerequisite for restorative justice
REKONSTRUKSI PEMBERI GRATIFIKASI SEBAGAI SUBYEK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Sulastri, Lusia; Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (487.173 KB) | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v1i3.33

Abstract

Gratification has not yet been regulated by laws and regulations as a criminal act. This happened in the Samin Tan case, where the judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court released Samin Tan from granting a gratuity of IDR 5 billion to Eni Maulani Saragih as a member of Commission VII DPR for the 2014-2019 period. The current formulation of policies regarding gratification in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Corruption requires restructuring, especially in the substance of the meaning of gratification, reporting on receipt of gratification to the KPK, criminal sanctions, and qualifications of the giver and recipient of gratification. so that the optimization of the application and enforcement of appropriate laws is achieved, namely certainty and justice. Reconstruction of the gratification provider for corruption must be based on a low level of gratification and bribery according to its definition. Bribery has the definition of a relationship due to the consequences of actions that result in or influence a person in his position as a state administrator to the interests of the bribe giver. While gratification should only be a gift, without having to be associated with any reciprocal actions. With a clear distinction between bribery and pure gratification that does not lead to bribery, the weight of the punishment is determined. Likewise, the gratuity giver, if it is said to be a bribe, must explain how much punishment was given to him. For example, the giver of gratuities as referred to in Article 12 B of Law no. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes is the same as receiving gratuities. Thus the effect can be felt in a balanced way because it destroys requests and requests for prohibited acts.
TANTANGAN DAN HAMBATAN PENERAPAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF PADA SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan; Hadingrat, Wahyu
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.95

Abstract

Media sosial kini menjadi faktor penting  dalam penyebaran radikalisme di Indonesia, hal ini didukung oleh pemakaian internet yang menunjukkan tren peningkatan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengkaji pengaturan penyebaran radikalisme dalam hukum pidana Indonesia, menganalisis kebijakan penanggulangan radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial di Indonesia. Selain itu juga membangun konsep kebijakan kriminal penanggulangan penyebaran radikalisme melalui media sosial di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa, pengaturan penyebaran radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial belum diatur secara komprehensif dalam hukum positif Indonesia. Upaya penanggulangan radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial di Indonesia  saat ini difokuskan pada penegakan hukum represif. Konsep kebijakan kriminal penanggulangan penyebaran radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial di Indonesia dilakukan melalui tiga poin penanggulangan radikalisme melalui media sosial yaitu pengawasan, penindakan dan kerjasama platform dan masyarakat. Penindakan yang dilakukan tentunya bukan hanya sebatas take down conten di media sosial namun juga assasment untuk menentukan tingkat radikalisasi dari pelaku.
Co-Authors ., Sunarko Hadingrat, Wahyu Lusia Sulastri, Lusia