Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal El Dinar Ikonomika : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam Al-Intaj : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah
Bin Shuib, Mohd Sollehudin
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
SHARIA GOVERNANCE IN ISLAMIC FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS: A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF MALAYSIA AND INDONESIA Faizi, Faizi; Bin Shuib, Mohd Sollehudin
EL DINAR: Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan Syariah Vol 12, No 1 (2024): El Dinar
Publisher : Faculty of Economics Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/ed.v12i1.25135

Abstract

As important participants in Sharia governance, Malaysia and Indonesia emphasize the importance of a Sharia supervisory board at the institutional level to ensure compliance with Islamic principles. This study provides a comparative analysis of Sharia governance practices in Indonesia and Malaysia, focusing on the key differences and similarities between the Sharia governance frameworks in Malaysia and Indonesia. The method adopted in this study was document research. This method allows researchers to access a wide range of information and perspectives from various sources such as books, academic journals, government reports, and online databases. The findings reveal that both Malaysia and Indonesia have implemented Sharia governance frameworks in their Islamic financial institutions. However, their structures and regulatory frameworks differ from each other. Malaysia follows a two-tier structure with a comprehensive framework, whereas Indonesia follows a decentralized model with dispersed regulations. Both countries require the establishment of a Sharia committee at the institutional level to ensure compliance with the Sharia principles. Therefore, this comparative analysis enhances the understanding of Sharia governance in Islamic banking and finance, shedding light on the strengths and weaknesses of Malaysia and Indonesia's frameworks
The Influence of Third-Party Funds and Other Operating Income on Profits of Islamic banking: Financing as an Intervening Variable Zaini, Faizi; Vitaloka, Deffia Dea; Bin Shuib, Mohd Sollehudin
IKONOMIKA Vol 8, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/febi.v8i1.15428

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of third-party funds and other operating income on profits at Bank Mega Syariah with financing as an intervening variable. This research is a quantitative model using secondary data with a purposive sampling technique. The sample used is the annual report of Bank Mega Syariah for the 2012-2021 period. Data were analyzed and processed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 25. The results found that third-party funds had a significant effect on financing. Meanwhile, other operating income has no significant effect on financing. Furthermore, third-party funds have a significant effect on net income. Other operating income and financing have no significant effect on net income. Then, financing cannot mediate the effect of third-party funds and other operating income on the net income. 
Social Media, Economic Constraints, and Humanitarian Values: Drivers of Boycott Behavior Among Young Muslim Consumers in Indonesia Faizi, Faizi; Putri, Indira Fadhilla; Bin Shuib, Mohd Sollehudin
Al-Intaj : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah Vol 11, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Economics and Islamic Business, UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/aij.v11i2.8236

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the influence of social media, economic factors, and humanitarian values on young Muslim consumers’ consumption preferences in Jabodetabek, Indonesia, regarding pro-Israel products amid ongoing boycott campaigns related to the Israel-Palestine conflict.Design/methodology: A quantitative approach was employed to collect data through surveys with 120 students in the Jabodetabek region. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) method was used for data analysis, focusing on variables such as social media exposure, price sensitivity, and ethical considerations.Findings: The results indicate that social media significantly shapes consumption preferences by disseminating information and forming public opinion, with platforms such as Instagram and TikTok playing a pivotal role. Economic factors, particularly price sensitivity and budget constraints, critically affect purchasing behavior, whereas humanitarian values, such as moral solidarity and ethical considerations, strongly motivate boycott participation. Collectively, these factors accounted for 62.8% of the variance in consumption preferences.Practical Implication: Businesses should adopt socially responsible branding and leverage social media to align themselves with consumer values. Policymakers and activists can use these insights to promote ethical consumption and support local alternatives.Originality/Value: This study integrates social media, economic, and humanitarian dimensions to offer a holistic understanding of boycott dynamics in an emerging economy. It bridges gaps in the literature by highlighting the interplay between digital influence, economic practicality, and moral convictions in consumer behavior
Co-Authors Faizi, Faizi Putri, Indira Fadhilla Vitaloka, Deffia Dea Zaini, Faizi