Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan Ilmu Hukum Prima
Suprayitno -
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMIMPIN VISIONER DALAM PERUBAHAN ORGANISASIONAL -, Suprayitno
JURNAL EKONOMI DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN Vol 7, No 2 (2007): Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan
Publisher : Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (62.769 KB)

Abstract

Abstract Leader owning activity, speed and also can adapt in bringing the way organization have important role in face of condition of organization which ever experience of change. Because, organizational flexibility basically represent people who masterpiece can act proactive, creative, innovation and non conventional. Persons like this required as organizational leader in this time. A leader is change inspiration and visionary, that is have clear vision up at which organization will be brought. Keywords: visionary leader, organizational change, human resource
ANALISIS YURIDIS AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PERUBAHAN ALAMAT KANTOR YANG TIDAK DILAPORKAN KEPADA MAJELIS PENGAWAS DAERAH Faisal Ramadhan Harahap; Budiman Ginting; Suprayitno -
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v4i3.2174

Abstract

A notary is obliged to report any changes of his registered office address to the Regional Supervisory (henceford refrered to as MPD). Pursuant to the regulations of the Minister of Law and Human Right Number 15/2020 on the procedures of inspections by supervisory council, MPD gives a notary a minimum of 1 (one) regular visit a year. This Research is encouragedby the experience service user who misses out a notary’s new office address to MPD. This Research problems are how to changes to a notary’s registered office address are regulated by the law, how legal sanctions are regulated by the law to a notary for not reporting changes to his registered office address, and what efforts are made by MPD to enforce the law against any notary who does not report changes of his registered office address. Emprirical Normative research method is employed as this research studies primary legal materials such as the Law Number 4/2014, the Regulations of Minister of Law and Human Right Number 19/2019, and the Minister of Law and Human Right Number 61/2016, as well as references and secondary materials supported with interviews with informans. The objective of this research are to investigate and to analyse the laws and to a notary for not reporting changes of his registered office address, and the efforts made by MPD to enforce the againsts any notary who does not report changes of his registered office address. The research concludes that the obligation of a notary to report changes to his registered office address is specified in Regulations of the Minister of Law and Human Right Number 19/2019 and the other notar;s obligations are stipulated in the Law on Notary Functions. The imposition of sanction such as a registered office address is obstructed by the long-winded bureaucracy causing difficulties to MPD in supervising notaries and enforcing the fulfilment of laws and regulations concerning notary’s obligations be synchronized, bureaucracy process to impose the sanction of written deterrant to notaries be steamlined, facilities and insfrastucture required by MPD to perform their duties be completed, and double functions of members of MPD be avoided that the supervision over notaris can be more optimal.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS PEMEGANG PROTOKOL TERHADAP KEABSAHAN AKTA NOTARIS TERKAIT DUGAAN ADANYA KESALAHAN DI DALAM MINUTA AKTA YANG DITERIMANYA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1791 K/Pdt/2022) -, Tommy; -, Tony; Sembiring, Rosnidar; -, Suprayitno
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v7i1.4962

Abstract

The plaintiff in the Supreme Court's decision Number 1791 K/Pdt/2022 sued the Notary public, holding the protocol as the defendant. The object of the lawsuit in the Supreme Court's decision is the Notary's deed in the Notary public protocol, which was received by the Notary public holding the protocol. The plaintiff disputed the error in the Notary's deed. Based on expert opinion, the Notary public who did the deed is responsible for the Notary's deed in the protocol, but the Notary who did the deed died. The Notary public holding the protocol is responsible for storing and maintaining the Notary public protocol he receives, but the Notary public holding the protocol was sued in the decision. This research uses normative legal research, which is descriptive and analytical in nature. The data source used is library data. The data collection technique and tool used is library research. This research analyzes data qualitatively. Based on Article 65 of the Law of Notary Public, the Notary public who makes the deed is responsible for the minutes of the deed he had made even though the minutes of the deed had been handed over to the Notary public holding the protocol. The Notary public holding the protocol is not responsible if there is a lawsuit regarding the contents of the minutes of the deed contained in the protocol he received. The Supreme Court's decision concerns Notary public matters, only considering the lawsuit as lacking parties.
Co-Authors -, Tommy -, Tony BUDIMAN GINTING Faisal Ramadhan Harahap Rosnidar Sembiring