Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

REVIEW BUKU DIPLOMASI DAN PEMBANGUNAN KONEKTIVITAS MARITIM INDONESIA DALAM KONSTELASI POLITIK GLOBAL Alunaza SD, Hardi
Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 17, No 2 (2020): Konstelasi Politik di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19 (I)
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Politik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v17i2.875

Abstract

Visi Pemerintahan Joko Widodo terkait poros maritim dunia berdasarkan tinjauan terhadap posisi strategis Indonesia yang memiliki lokasi di pusat perairan Asia Pasifik yang juga dikenal sebagai pusat komersial maritim. Melalui visi tersebut, Presiden Joko Widodo telah secara resmi mengumumkan program lima tahun dengan meningkatkan pembangunan 6 pelabuhan skala internasional diikuti dengan 24 pelabuhan komersial baru dan lebih dari seribu pelabuhan lainnya. Mega proyek ini dinilai sebagai penghubung bagian terpencil nusantara ke perdagangan dunia. Pembentukan poros maritim tidak hanya bertujuan untuk menjawab kebutuhan di tingkat domestik dan regional, tetapi juga tantangan dari dunia internasional mengenai pentingnya keberadaan jalur perdagangan dengan memanfaatkan jalur laut. Menanggapi proyek dari kebijakan Joko Widodo, Humphrey Wangke menunjukkan ancaman dari sisi keamanan terhadap poros maritim. Hal tersebut terlihat dari peningkatan ancaman keamanan yang terjadi terhadap kapal niaga di Kawasan Laut Sulu Sulawesi yang berbatasan langsung dengan Malaysia dan Filipina, termasuk ancaman rivalitas antara China dan Amerika yang terjadi di Laut China Selatan di tengah pandemi global Covid-19. Sikap konfrontatif AS dan klaim wilayah maritim yang dilakukan China ini berdampak terhadap kedaulatan Indonesia dalam melanjutkan pembangunan dan konektivitas maritim. Artikel ini bertujuan me-review buku Humprey Wangke yang meninjau konsep pembangunan konektivitas maritim dan diplomasi yang dilakukan Indonesia dalam menjaga kedaulatan dan keamanan di Laut Sulu Sulawesi dan Laut China Selatan.
Joe Biden Intervention in the Russian Invasion Effort Against Ukraine Alunaza SD, Hardi; Shafitri, Desy Nur; Ernianda, Annisa; Putri, Anggi
WIMAYA Vol. 3 No. 01 (2022)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL VETERAN JAWA TIMUR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/wimaya.v3i01.66

Abstract

The protracted conflict between Russia and Ukraine since 2014 has reached an unpredictable peak of tension. The military invasion of Russia on February 24, 2022, overwhelmed Ukraine in the face of attack. Randomly bombed facilities caused thousands of civilians to lose their homes and lives. Initially, this conflict was caused by the seizure of the territory of the Crimean Peninsula. The conflict spread to the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), ending in a difficult situation to control. Primarily when the United States officially provided military assistance to Ukraine during the conflict. In explaining this article, the author will use the Infra State-War Theory, the Concept of Military Intervention, and the Rational Actor Model Theory with a qualitative approach and descriptive research methods. This study's results aim to analyze the continuation of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The author will look at the evolution of the intervention of the United States in the era of Joe Biden's leadership in three phases of discussion. First, this article will elaborate on the origin of the conflict over the territory of the Crimean Peninsula. Second, it describes the interventions that have been carried out by the United States before. Third, this article will explain and analyze how the United States intervened during the leadership of Joe Biden.
Globalization as the Constraint Factor of the European Union-United States TTIP Alunaza SD, Hardi; Sherin, Virginia
Global Local Interactions: Journal of International Relations Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Global-Local Interactions: Journal of International Relations
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/gli.v1i1.7532

Abstract

This paper aims to explain the impact of globalization on Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) agreement between European Union (EU) and United States (US). Regarding its implementation, TTIP received negative response. The main policies in TTIP agreement will burden the access of Europeans' businesses to compete on local and national scale. Through the free market, Made in America products will enter the European market, which will certainly cause a decline in demand for Europeans’ local products. As a result, the Europeans believed that benefits of TTIP only be felt by a few people. This paper attempts to explain the problem using the theory of foreign policy and the theory of globalization. The author uses qualitative research methods with data collection techniques through literature studies. The results of this paper show that Europeans considered TTIP agreement as a form of hegemony from private corporations to the governments of EU countries as an impact of globalization process. This criticism has finally become a challenge for EU national authorities to implementing the TTIP so that this agreement postponed in October 2016 and still has not continued until now.