Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Popular dating apps in Indonesia and the United States Ilmiawan, Ramadhani Akbar; Nafisah, Riza Maqfiratun; Nisa, Rizki Khoirun; Hart, Yaritza Haq Indra; Herdianto, Roni
Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Association for Scientific Computing Electrical and Engineering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31763/businta.v5i2.405

Abstract

The use of smartphones and the internet has changed the way people have partners. Location-based dating apps are also designed to maximize people's experience of finding partners. Apart from the various benefits, there are also risks such as adultery, fraud, and sexual crimes. In this research, we want to study the research and negative impacts of the three most popular dating apps in Indonesia and the United States. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative narrative approach. The purpose of this study is to compare the use of dating apps in Indonesia and the United States and the negative impacts of these dating apps. This research finds that Tinder is the dating app with the most number of users and has the best privacy and security policy system in Indonesia and the United States. However, due to cultural and environmental differences in the two countries, internet crime is more prone to occur in the United States. Even so, the legal protection in the United States in resolving cases caused by dating apps is more robust than in Indonesia.
CLASSIFICATION MODELS FOR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NAÏVE BAYES AND RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHMS IN ANALYZING UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG STUDENT GRADES Kurniasari, Dian; Hidayah, Rekti Nurul; Notiragayu, Notiragayu; Warsono, Warsono; Nisa, Rizki Khoirun
Jurnal Teknik Informatika (Jutif) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2024): JUTIF Volume 5, Number 5, Oktober 2024
Publisher : Informatika, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52436/1.jutif.2024.5.5.2066

Abstract

At the university, students are provided with a comprehensive assessment of their academic achievements for each course completed at the end of every semester. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two classification methods, the Naïve Bayes and the Random Forest methods, in classifying student learning outcomes. The research process is segmented into various stages: data selection, data preparation, model building and testing, and model evaluation. The findings indicated that the Naïve Bayes and Random Forest approaches exhibited superior accuracy levels when employing data splitting strategies, in contrast to k-fold cross-validation. Based on the examination, the Random Forest approach demonstrated superiority in identifying the scores of University of Lampung students, achieving an accuracy percentage of 99.38%. Notably, both techniques showed a substantial performance improvement using Gradient Boosting. The Naïve Bayes method attained an accuracy rate of 99.89%, while the Random Forest method reached 99.45%. The results demonstrate that employing the Random Forest classification method consistently leads to superior performance in identifying and classifying student grades. Furthermore, using Gradient Boosting in the boosting process has demonstrated its efficacy in enhancing the classification methods' accuracy. These findings significantly contribute to the comprehension and advancement of evaluation systems for assessing student learning outcomes in the university environment.
IMPLEMENTATION OF FUZZY C-MEANS AND FUZZY POSSIBILISTIC C-MEANS ALGORITHMS ON POVERTY DATA IN INDONESIA Kurniasari, Dian; Kurniawati, Virda; Nuryaman, Aang; Usman, Mustofa; Nisa, Rizki Khoirun
BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan Vol 18 No 3 (2024): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application
Publisher : PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/barekengvol18iss3pp1919-1930

Abstract

Cluster analysis involves the methodical categorization of data based on the degree of similarity within each group to group data with similar characteristics. This study focuses on classifying poverty data across Indonesian provinces. The methodologies employed include the Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) and Fuzzy Probabilistic C-Means (FPCM) algorithms. The FCM algorithm is a clustering approach where membership values determine the presence of each data point in a cluster. On the other hand, the FPCM algorithm builds upon FCM and Possibilistic C (PCM) algorithms by incorporating probabilistic considerations. This research compares the FCM and FPCM algorithms using local poverty data from Indonesia, specifically examining the Partition Entropy (PE) index value. It aims to identify the optimal number of clusters for provincial-level poverty data in Indonesia. The findings indicate that the FPCM algorithm outperforms the FCM algorithm in categorizing poverty in Indonesia, as evidenced by the PE validity index. Furthermore, the study identifies that the ideal number of clusters for the data is 2.