Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Studi Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JDAB)
Setiaji, Yongky Teguh
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
When Control Backfires: The Double-Edged Role of Management Control Systems in Environmental Capabilities and Environmental Management Accounting Practices Odang, Nilam Kemala; Murni, Indah; Zharaura, Khusnul Afifah; Setiaji, Yongky Teguh
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis Vol 12, No 1 (2025): March 2025
Publisher : Accounting Departement Economics and Business Faculty Syiah Kuala University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jdab.v12i1.43670

Abstract

This study examined how environmental management control systems (EMCS) moderate the relationship between environmental capabilities (EC) and the implementation of environmental management accounting (EMA). By integrating EC and EMCS within a unified framework, the analysis draws on data from 900 non-financial Southeast Asian companies reporting ESG metrics from 2019 to 2023. Using ordinal logistic regression, the findings reveal that while EC positively influences EMA implementation, EMCS unexpectedly weakens this effect. This suggests that rigid or misaligned control systems may hinder the effective utilization of environmental capabilities. The study underscores the conditional role of EMCS and highlights the importance of contextually adaptive systems that support, rather than constrain, strategic environmental initiatives. It contributes to the literature by demonstrating how the ECEMCS interaction can either facilitate or obstruct EMA implementation, particularly within the Southeast Asian context.
Penelitian dan Akuntabilitas Keuangannya Suryani, Ani Wilujeng; Setiaji, Yongky Teguh; Retnaningsih, Prihatini; Alfianto, Imam
Studi Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/sakman.v5i1.3698

Abstract

Purpose: The case of manipulation in preparing financial reports in research carried out by university lecturers is a serious problem. This study aims to investigate the causes of lecturers having lack of accountability in their research financial reporting Methodology/approach: The systematic review method is used to conceptually explore why lecturers commit dishonest actions in financial reporting. The articles analyzed were 48 national and international journal articles from the Sinta and Google Scholar databases. Results/findings: The results show that fraud is influenced by information asymmetry, weak monitoring, and workload pressure from tridarma and publication demands. Universities should simplify reporting and enhance monitoring, while lecturers need work-life balance to reduce stress and improve accountability. Conclusion : Lecturers’ financial reporting issues stem from asymmetry, poor monitoring, and pressure. Improving oversight and work-life balance can enhance accountability. Limitations: : This study is limited to a literature review without primary data, so it cannot directly assess lecturers' understanding of financial accountability. Future research should use surveys or interviews. Contribution: This study confirms agency theory by highlighting information asymmetry and weak monitoring in universities. It provides a policy basis to enhance lecturer accountability, reduce fraud, and promote financial accountability and work-life balance.
Penelitian dan Akuntabilitas Keuangannya Suryani, Ani Wilujeng; Setiaji, Yongky Teguh; Retnaningsih, Prihatini; Alfianto, Imam
Studi Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Manajemen Vol 5 No 1 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/sakman.v5i1.3698

Abstract

Purpose: The case of manipulation in preparing financial reports in research carried out by university lecturers is a serious problem. This study aims to investigate the causes of lecturers having lack of accountability in their research financial reporting Methodology/approach: The systematic review method is used to conceptually explore why lecturers commit dishonest actions in financial reporting. The articles analyzed were 48 national and international journal articles from the Sinta and Google Scholar databases. Results/findings: The results show that fraud is influenced by information asymmetry, weak monitoring, and workload pressure from tridarma and publication demands. Universities should simplify reporting and enhance monitoring, while lecturers need work-life balance to reduce stress and improve accountability. Conclusion : Lecturers’ financial reporting issues stem from asymmetry, poor monitoring, and pressure. Improving oversight and work-life balance can enhance accountability. Limitations: : This study is limited to a literature review without primary data, so it cannot directly assess lecturers' understanding of financial accountability. Future research should use surveys or interviews. Contribution: This study confirms agency theory by highlighting information asymmetry and weak monitoring in universities. It provides a policy basis to enhance lecturer accountability, reduce fraud, and promote financial accountability and work-life balance.
Co-Authors Imam Alfianto indah murni Nilam Kemala Odang Retnaningsih, Prihatini Suryani, Ani Wilujeng Zharaura, Khusnul Afifah